I -- Joe Campbell -- was the one who said the reply to Tom was petty. It was not a snide comment. It was spot on. I gave my reasons; I'm sorry you don't understand them.<br><br>Below is just a rant, so I'm not going to take the time to fully read it let alone give it an adequate reply. It is hard to know where to begin and I have a day job.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Jay Borden <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jborden@datawedge.com">jborden@datawedge.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Wait, Tom Hanson [yet again] inserts a snide retort… but I’m the one that gets the “petty reply” comment? (I swear, there are times that I think Mr. Hanson has some “diplomatic immunity” card when posting here, as few seem to point out the fact that “liberal swaying” opinions seem to be held to a much different posting standard than anyone who carries a conservative point of view.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">In any case…my comment is not “petty”. Tom Hanson [gleefully] loves to “snip and post” other people words in his responses… it’s not petty to take his words as his argument, since… that’s what he said.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Tom Hanson used the word “guarantee” in his post. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">From here, we can either assume Tom is under the illusion that the FAA does, in fact, guarantee his safety when he flies… since *<b>that’s what he posted</b>*. Or, we can say that “that’s not really what Tom meant”, in which case we can [gleefully] toss out much of what Tom’s posts under the convenient “that’s not really what Tom meant” category. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Frankly, I’m fine with either assumption.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">From here, yes, of course there are no guarantees in life. (Well, “death and taxes”, to beat the old saying yet again). <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Are the FAA, Agriculture, Education, and the EPA “OK”? I’m not sure how to answer that… the liberals have the far easier case to make in favor of programs that assist us in flying, food, teaching, and the environment.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Insert traditional [ridiculous and loaded] arguments: “What? You aren’t in favor of airline safety? What? You want to return to the days of Upton Sinclair? What? You want don’t want our students to learn? What? You want to destroy the environment?”<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">These are the typical [and tiring] responses when any conservative opens their mouth on any of these fronts to ask the simple question “does it truly require a government agency to achieve these goals? Are there any other alternative ideas out there that could achieve the same goals without creating a juggernaut government agency in the process?”<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Each of these agencies listed (and, frankly, most if not all government agencies) has a “greater good” in mind. And each of these agencies has their genesis in that thought process of “doing good”. But, each of these agencies (like many/most government entities) goes down the path of expansion, regulation, and eventual encroachment into areas that may not have been initially intended.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Rather than tackle all of these examples, I’ll tackle one… the FAA. (Since I used to have my private pilot’s license…)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">The initial kernel of intent behind the government’s plan was to simply boost airline safety as the world witnessed the airplane transmogrify from a backyard tinker-toy into a viable commercial vehicle. FDR signed the legislation into law, tasking a new agency with coming up with the rules of engagement for air traffic, issuing pilot licenses, etc etc.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Fantastic.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Just a few years later, the new agency worked with airlines to establish common routes between the larger cities, and to establish (airline run and managed) ATC centers.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">But just a few years after that, FDR also signed into law legislation that suddenly expanded this agency greatly, and created a few new ones. These new agencies had the authority to take over ATC from the airlines. In addition, that same legislation allowed another new agency to suddenly regulate air fares, and start determining routes and divvying them out to individual carriers [government price fixing]. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">In WWII, the agencies expanded again… and took over the operation of all city airport towers… (for security and defensive purposes)… but after the war, the federal government maintained this control.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Somewhere in the 1950’s, the FAA was born.. wrapping up all of these independently created government entities into one larger one… the FAA… and again, the powers were expanded.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">At the same time the FAA was created… an agency FOR the purpose of airline safety was also created… the NTSB. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">So… wait a minute… if the initial intent was to bolster airline safety… and that agency is the NTSB… what exactly is the FAA? <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">The short answer, is… everything else. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Ok… so what is the FAA responsible for? Well… in addition to doing a lot of good things that DO need to get done… they are also involved in projects that really have nothing to do with their initial intent. According to their 2012 budget requests (as I glance through it…)… they’re involved in research projects for “Environmental Sustainability”… they are introducing a CAAFI initiative “to qualify and approve new types of aviation fuels” … on their budget they have line item requests for funding for “Improved Public Transit Experiences”… and “Improved networks accommodating Pedestrians and Bicycles”… “Improved Access for Special Needs Populations”…<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.dot.gov/budget/2012/budgetestimates/faa.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.dot.gov/budget/2012/budgetestimates/faa.pdf</a><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">The FAA, while it DOES do many good things, is just one example of a government agency that has slowly expanded and bled into other areas that have nothing really to do with the intent behind the initial formation.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Does this automatically mean that I’m against airline safety, or the creation and adherence to safety guidelines in the aviation world? Does this automatically mean that I’m some sort of anarchist that wants planes to fall out of the sky? <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">No… of course not… it means that I look at the GROWTH of a government agency, and question whether or not that GROWTH is necessary, and at what point the government has overstepped boundaries from its initial creation. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">It’s interesting to note, as an aside, that many on the left view too much growth of business (approaching monopoly) as an evil… they see it as a concentration of too much power in the hands of greedy people wanting nothing more than to control, until eventually they start to encroach on the lives of others.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">To a certain extent, I agree… (insert tired comments regarding monopolies being impossible in TRUE free market societies… debate ad-nauseum).<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">But the same is true when it comes to government agencies as well… as government agencies grow, they begin to amass power… they expand their regulations, their scope of responsibilities, their power… their control… and they start to meddle in things and affairs that perhaps wasn’t their creators initial intent.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Let’s not forget that businesses and governmental agencies are both run by the same common denominator: people. Too much expansion in either flavor results in the end-result… too much power, resulting in someone else losing personal choice, freedoms, and options as a result. And, those same people bemoan the loss of power, whether it comes in the form of a business potentially being broken up for anti-trust issues, or whether it be a government agency threatened with decommissioning by an up-and-coming politician promising smaller government. (That sounded like a thinly-veiled Ron Paul endorsement… I assure you, it wasn’t intended that way).<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">On a much broader scale… on a much bigger picture… I tire of government expansion. It’s frustrating to me that no matter who is in charge in Washington.. (Republicans, Democrats, whoever)… the “ratchet” that continually introduces new RULES, REGULATIONS, HOOPS, RED TAPE just keeps on turning. With very few exceptions, it seems each new rotation of elected representatives simply result in additional rules created, additional freedoms taken away from us and hoarded by the government, and additional agencies and firms created by the government to create even more of said same. Rarely do we see agencies TRULY decommissioned… instead we see agencies rolled up and consolidated… creating an ever expanding bureaucracy that continues to just expand on itself.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">For example…. WITHOUT MAKING THIS INTO A “GUN” DEBATE : We’re a gun-carrying country… does anyone really believe that the government would actually LESSEN the TSA and their “air marshall” program, and let passengers with a concealed carry permit actually carry on an airplane? No.. instead we’ll introduce MORE legislation, and take away individual freedoms (like 3oz limitations on carry-on liquids) to maintain an illusion of security… passing along our freedoms to the TSA as we stand in line to get strip-searched by a government agency.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Wait… Mr. Hanson… I’ll beat you to your own predictable reply:<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">------<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">“Mr. Borden stupidly suggests:<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">“…. let passengers with a concealed carry permit actually carry a gun on an airplane…”<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">“That’s great! I wonder if Senator McGee has his concealed carry permit!”<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">------<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">I’m merely point out that as Americans we have freedoms… but as government expands the powers they take on have to come from somewhere…and that government expansion and regulation comes at the cost of our personal choices… one regulation at a time.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">That’s my .02… which (after a long work day… and now a long after-midnight post… ) has expanded to about $20.00. And I’m sure my inbox will practically be on fire by noon tomorrow.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">And, Joe… (if you even read down this far)… if you are still truly interested in my economic take on “Universal Health Care”… let me know… and I’ll summon up the energy for another “War and Peace” sized reply… my short answer spans the topics of economics and philosophy… and my longer answer will wind up wearing my fingers to nubs.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Jay<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Joe Campbell [mailto:<a href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com" target="_blank">philosopher.joe@gmail.com</a>] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, January 07, 2012 10:00 PM<br><b>To:</b> Jay Borden<br><b>Cc:</b> Tom Hansen; lfalen; <a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com" target="_blank">vision2020@moscow.com</a></span></p><div><div class="h5"><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Vision2020] Globaql Food Safety Fund<u></u><u></u></div></div><p></p></div><div><div class="h5"><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Petty comment, Jay. <br>
<br>Take "guarantee" out of it. In life there are few guarantees. Your car does not guarantee your transportation; oxygen, food, and water do not guarantee life. (Were this a logic class, I would note the difference between necessary and sufficient conditions.)<br>
<br>Which institution stands a better chance of securing your travel from Lewiston to Seattle? The federal government or the state? That was Tom's point. Since there is no single state involved in this transportation, Tom's example of the FAA is another good example of the need for federal government programs.<br>
<br>So far it seems that these federal governmental programs are OK: FAA, Agriculture, Education, and EPA. Again, I'm willing to hear objections to these points but as I see it the cases have been clearly made. I'm unaware of substantive arguments against these programs, just nifty slogans like "Big government is communism."<br>
<br>Note that Roger's comment about the federal government not telling us what to eat is something that liberals can hang their hat on too since it concerns the matter of civil LIBERTIES and the State's (broadly concerned to include the federal government) right to limit your behavior. I agree with Roger on this point: the State should not tell you what to eat but neither should your state (Idaho).<br>
<br>One last matter, and I'm genuinely interested in your reply. What is wrong with universal healthcare? It is a fact that insurance is influenced by numbers: the more people insured, the lower the costs. This is why my insurance benefits are better than those you can get at some smaller company. And it is a fact that uninsured people have a financial impact on the insured. Doctors, hospitals attempt to run at a profit (if they can) so the costs incurred by those who don't pay will be passed on to those who do pay. Knowing just these two facts, how could it not benefit us all from a purely economical point of view to have universal heath care? I'm aware of spurious arguments about "limitations of doctors" but that is BS since anyone with insurance suffers these limitations. This is an argument insurance in general. Maybe we should do away with insurance and have everyone be responsible for saving enough money to pay for their doctor bills as they go. Is that your view?<br>
<br>But I'm a philosopher, not an economist and since you know so much more about the business world than I do, I realize I might be missing something. What is it?<br><br>Best, Joe<u></u><u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal">
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Jay Borden <<a href="mailto:jborden@datawedge.com" target="_blank">jborden@datawedge.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">FAA doesn't "guarantee your safety" any more than Medicare guarantees<br>
your health.<br><span style="color:#888888"><br><br><span>Jay</span></span><u></u><u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: <a href="mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com" target="_blank">vision2020-bounces@moscow.com</a><br>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com" target="_blank">vision2020-bounces@moscow.com</a>] On Behalf Of Tom Hansen<br>Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 1:17 PM<br>To: lfalen<br>Cc: <a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com" target="_blank">vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Globaql Food Safety Fund<br><br>How about the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), Mr. Falen? Or am I<br>gonna have to rely on the state of to guarantee my safety when I board<br>an aircraft at Boise, Lewiston, or Moscow . . . as Senator McGee taxis<br>
the aircraft down the tarmac.<br><br>Seeya later, Moscow.<br><br>Tom Hansen<br>Spokane, Washington<br><br>"If not us, who?<br>If not now, when?"<br><br>- Unknown<br><br>On Jan 7, 2012, at 12:56 PM, lfalen <<a href="mailto:lfalen@turbonet.com" target="_blank">lfalen@turbonet.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>> There are some things the federal government should do. Namely things<br>that can not be none by state or local government, Protecting the food<br>supply is one of them. In conjunction with private bussiness the<br>
government should insure that the food supply is safe and also provide<br>education on the nutritionall value of food and health supplements. What<br>government at any level should not do is prohibit people from eating<br>
what ever they desire, so long as it does not harm someone else.<br>> Roger<br>> -----Original message-----<br>> From: Joe Campbell <a href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com" target="_blank">philosopher.joe@gmail.com</a><br>
> Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 07:17:50 -0800<br>> To: lfalen <a href="mailto:lfalen@turbonet.com" target="_blank">lfalen@turbonet.com</a><br>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Globaql Food Safety Fund<br>><br>>> Roger,<br>
>><br>>> I hope you don't take this as my being antagonistic. I know we've had<br>our<br>>> issues in the past. But how is this not "Big Government" in action?<br>If we<br>>> dismantle the government in the way that some Republicans advocate,<br>
how are<br>>> initiatives like this going to be made more possible? And how can we<br>>> "address high priority food hazards" with restricting businesses in<br>certain<br>>> ways? These are honest questions.<br>
>><br>>> Best, Joe<br>>><br>>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:31 AM, lfalen <<a href="mailto:lfalen@turbonet.com" target="_blank">lfalen@turbonet.com</a>> wrote:<br>>><br>>>> From The December.January issue of Food Safety. The Grocery<br>
Manufactures<br>>>> AQssociation joined U. S. Government and World Bank officials in<br>announcing<br>>>> an innovative public-private partnership that has pledged $1million<br>toward<br>>>> the creation of the world's first Global Safety Fund. to be managed<br>
by the<br>>>> World bank. The fund is expected to grow to $15 to $20 million in<br>the<br>>>> first decade. They will address high priority food hazards, such as<br>>>> aflatoxin in grain, Salmonella, Literia, Escherichia coli, and viral<br>
and<br>>>> bacterial pathogens in seafood. They will also strengthen testing<br>and other<br>>>> problems involved with food safety.<br>>>> Roger<br>>>><br>>>> =======================================================<br>
>>> List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>>>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>>>> <a href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.net</a><br>
>>> mailto:<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com" target="_blank">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>>>> =======================================================<br>>>><br>>><br>>><br>
><br>> =======================================================<br>> List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>> <a href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.net</a><br>
> mailto:<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com" target="_blank">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>> =======================================================<br><br>=======================================================<br>
List services made available by First Step Internet,<br> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br> <a href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.net</a><br> mailto:<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com" target="_blank">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
=======================================================<br><br>=======================================================<br> List services made available by First Step Internet,<br> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>
<a href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.net</a><br> mailto:<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com" target="_blank">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>=======================================================<u></u><u></u></p>
</div></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br>