<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
    <title></title>
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
    <br>
    Because the Congressional "super-committee" couldn't agree on budget
    cuts and we've since defaulted to across-the-board cuts.  That was
    all part of the deal that was passed when we were trying to shave
    the smallest amounts off a small piece of the debt during the whole
    "debt ceiling" fiasco.<br>
    <br>
    We did this to ourselves by electing such a contentious Congress.<br>
    <br>
    Paul<br>
    <br>
    On 01/02/2012 10:09 AM, Joe Campbell wrote:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:DA7D276E-08CC-445C-845C-FC144548E264@gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div>Why do we have to cut back on programs? We were fine with the
        programs. It was the wars that got us in debt, right? <br>
        <br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
        On Jan 2, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Paul Rumelhart <<a
          moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com">godshatter@yahoo.com</a>>
        wrote:<br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>
          <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
            http-equiv="Content-Type">
          <title></title>
          <br>
          Well, that's the problem with across-the-board budget cuts,
          isn't it?  Nobody is going to be pleased.<br>
          <br>
          We have to cut budgets, and since nobody in Congress can agree
          on which way is up, this is our only real solution.<br>
          <br>
          We have to cut back on how much we spend, since our spending
          is out of control.  It's ridiculous.<br>
          <br>
          Paul<br>
          <br>
          On 01/02/2012 09:31 AM, Tom Hansen wrote:
          <blockquote
            cite="mid:42041143-EA68-4C9A-95B1-90C71656374A@moscow.com"
            type="cite">
            <div>Nice, huh?</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Courtesy of the January 9, 2012 edition of the Army
              Times.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>------------------------------</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times;
              font-size: medium;"><span class="maintitle"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 1em; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><b>Budget
                  cuts could slash $1B from vets health care</b></span></span><span
              class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times;
              font-size: medium;"><span class="subtitle"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 0.9em; font-weight: bold;"><b> <br>
                  Lawmakers may reverse on promises not to cut VA</b></span></span><span
              class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times;
              font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span>
            <p style="font-family: Times; font-size: medium;"
              align="justify"><span class="abody" style="font-family:
                Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 0.8em; color:
                rgb(0, 0, 0);">By Rick Maze</span><span class="abody"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 0.8em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>
                <br>
                As veterans groups face the pos sible automatic,
                across-the-board cuts in federal spending that could
                begin in 2013, fear of the unknown is strong.<br>
                <br>
                The Budget Control Act of 2011</span><span class="abody"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 0.8em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> is “imprecise,”
                says a House staff member who has been trying to advise
                lawmakers on how the Vet erans Affairs Department would
                fare if $1.2 trillion in automatic budget cuts are
                ordered Jan. 2, 2013.<br>
                <br>
                Veterans disability, survivor, education and training
                benefits, and low-income pensions are exempt from the
                automatic cuts, a process known as sequestra tion. But
                it is unclear whether veterans health care funds are
                protected.<br>
                <br>
              </span><span class="abody" style="font-family:
                Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 0.8em; color:
                rgb(0, 0, 0);">A 2 percent cut in veterans health care
                funding appears possi ble under some readings of the law
                — and its references back to the 1985 Balanced Budget
                and Emer gency Deficit Control Act, more commonly known
                as the Gramm-Rudman Act.<br>
                <br>
                “We have not heard any specifics, only vague references
                that earlier pledges not to cut VA health care or
                benefits may not be honored by Congress,” said David
                Autry of Disabled American Veter ans. “That is
                worrisome.” With a health care budget of about $51
                billion to serve 6.2 mil­lion patients, a sequester
                could </span><span class="Apple-style-span"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 15px;">result in a $1 billion cut at a time
                when the population of Iraq and Afghanistan combat
                veterans seeking treatment for the physical and mental
                wounds of war is on the rise. </span></p>
            <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times;
              font-size: medium;"><span class="abody"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 0.8em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Some patients,
                particularly veterans who do not have serviceconnected
                disabilities, could be turned away, say representatives
                of veterans groups who have studied the potential
                impact. </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span"
              style="font-family: Times; font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><span class="abody"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 0.8em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Fear of
                devastating cuts from sequestration is partly why
                leaders of the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs
                committees were willing in October to propose cuts in
                veterans benefits. </span></span><span
              class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times;
              font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><span class="abody"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 0.8em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">A joint letter
                signed by Sens. Patty Murray, D-Wash., and Richard Burr,
                R-N.C., and Reps. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., and Bob Filner,
                D-Calif., the leaders of the committees, acknowledged
                that a “plausible legal interpretation” of the budget
                law puts veterans medical funds at risk for cuts. </span></span><span
              class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times;
              font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><span class="abody"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 0.8em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">“We would rather
                make the difficult decisions now so that we may never
                reach that possibility down the road,” the four
                lawmakers said in a letter to the Joint Select Committee
                on Deficit Reduction that tried but failed to come up
                with an overall $1.2 trillion deficit reduction package
                that would have avoided sequestration. </span></span><span
              class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times;
              font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><span class="abody"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 0.8em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">The four were so
                concerned about harm to the VA health care budget that
                they were willing to take some controversial actions,
                including capping annual increases in GI Bill benefits
                at a level below increases in tuition. </span></span><span
              class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times;
              font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><span class="abody"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 0.8em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Miller, the
                House Veterans’ Affairs Committee chairman, said any
                automatic cuts “would have a negative impact on VA’s
                health care system and its ability to properly care for
                our veterans.” He expressed frustration that the White
                House and VA have not clarified the situation. “I have
                raised this concern numerous times in the past few
                months, but I am still waiting to hear,” he said. “It is
                now incumbent on the administration to clarify this
                issue immediately for veterans once and for all.” Ryan
                Gallucci of Veterans of Foreign Wars said there is still
                time to fight to protect veterans programs. “Since no
                one seems to know for sure, we have a year to make our
                case to preserve our earned veterans benefits,” said
                Gallucci, VFW’s deputy national legislative director. </span></span><span
              class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times;
              font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><span class="abody"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 0.8em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">“It’s important
                for our members to call and write Congress to explain
                why these programs are important and why our veterans
                need them to remain intact.” In a Nov. 22 statement to
                its members, the VFW warns that sequestration could lead
                to increases in co-payments for medical visits and
                prescription drugs for veterans, and an increase in the
                enrollment fee for veterans who sign up for VA treatment
                but do not have service-connected health issues. </span></span><span
              class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times;
              font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><span class="abody"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 0.8em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Signed by Robert
                Wallace, executive director of VFW’s Washington office,
                the statement encourages members to contact lawmakers to
                press for a full VA exemption to sequestration. </span></span><span
              class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times;
              font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><span class="abody"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 0.8em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">“Over the next
                year, many in Congress as well as thousands of
                registered lobbyists will be working hard to protect
                their special interests and programs,” the VFW statement
                says. </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span"
              style="font-family: Times; font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><br>
            </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
              Times; font-size: medium;"><span class="abody"
                style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;
                font-size: 0.8em; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">“We must all
                work hard to protect the Department of Veterans Affairs
                health, benefits and cemetery administrations, as well
                as all military quality of life programs for the troops,
                their families and military retirees.” </span></span>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>------------------------------<br>
              <br>
              <div>Seeya later, Moscow.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Tom Hansen</div>
              <div>Spokane, Washington</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>"If not us, who?</div>
              <div>If not now, when?"</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>- Unknown</div>
            </div>
            <pre wrap=""><fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet,
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</a>
          <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</a>
=======================================================</pre>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div><span>=======================================================</span><br>
          <span> List services made available by First Step Internet,</span><br>
          <span> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.</span><br>
          <span>               <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</a></span><br>
          <span>          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</a></span><br>
          <span>=======================================================</span></div>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>