<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
This month's Vanity Fair magazine, the one with Lady Gaga on the cover, has a profoundly insightful article (by Todd Purdum, I think) about post-Cold War U.S. expansionism and the rapacious appetite of the military-industrial complex over the last fifty or so years. <br><br>It's not just sobering. It's horrifying. Sadly, more people care about the nude picture of Lady Gaga than the perspective Purdum draws from in his analysis of a country seemingly panting with eagerness to find new enemies, military targets, and unholy allliances.<br><br><font style="" color="#8064a2"><font style="font-size:12pt" size="3"><font style="" face="Verdana">Keely<br>www.keely-prevailingwinds.com<br></font></font></font><br><br><div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div><hr id="stopSpelling">Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 11:19:52 -0800<br>From: philosopher.joe@gmail.com<br>To: sunilramalingam@hotmail.com<br>CC: vision2020@moscow.com<br>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw: On Ron Paul and Racism<br><br>Thanks for the post, Sunil. When I think about Obama I fear for our "democracy." Why did he cave from the views he expressed in his candidacy? I wonder if there are things about our military involvement that we citizens don't know. It seems as if every US president acts the same. Our policies never change be they Democrat or Republican.<br>
<br>Don't read this as a fallacious argument for Obama. I'm in your camp. Bad is bad, and the better of two bads is still bad. What I wonder about is how much control our President has over the military and whether we are still a democracy as opposed to a military state. Obama's actions make no sense given the words of his previous election campaign.<br>
<br><div class="ecxgmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Sunil Ramalingam <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sunilramalingam@hotmail.com">sunilramalingam@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="ecxgmail_quote" style="border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div dir="ltr">
Here's are a couple of excerpts from Glenn Greenwald's column today. As I read it I thought of the discussion we've been having here about Ron Paul. I think the whole thing is worth reading, so here's the link:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/progressives_and_the_ron_paul_fallacies/singleton/" target="_blank">http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/progressives_and_the_ron_paul_fallacies/singleton/</a><br><br>The links in the excerpts don't work, but those in the actual article do.<br>
<br>First:<br><br>"The thing I loathe most about election season is reflected in the
central fallacy that drives progressive discussion the minute “Ron Paul”
is mentioned. As soon as his candidacy is discussed, progressives will
reflexively point to a slew of positions he holds that are anathema to
liberalism and odious in their own right and then say: <i>how can you support someone who holds this awful, destructive position</i>?
The premise here — the game that’s being played — is that if you can
identify some heinous views that a certain candidate holds, then it
means they are beyond the pale, that no Decent Person should even
consider praising any part of their candidacy.<br><br>The fallacy in this
reasoning is glaring. The candidate supported by progressives —
President Obama — himself holds heinous views on a slew of critical
issues and himself has done heinous things with the power he has been
vested. He has slaughtered civilians — Muslim <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/closeread/2011/05/asleep-in-afghanistan.html" target="_blank">children</a> by the dozens — not once or twice, but continuously in <a href="http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-06-30/politics/30095838_1_al-qaeda-qaeda-somalian-islamist" target="_blank">numerous nations</a> with <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/17/us-drone-strikes-pakistan-waziristan" target="_blank">drones</a>, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/yemen/7806882/US-cluster-bombs-killed-35-women-and-children.html" target="_blank">cluster bombs</a> and other <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/04/gen_mcchrystal_weve_shot_an_amazing_number_of_peop.php" target="_blank">forms of attack</a>. He has <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/12/u_s_takes_the_lead_on_behalf_of_cluster_bombs/" target="_blank">sought</a>
to overturn a global ban on cluster bombs. He has institutionalized the
power of Presidents — in secret and with no checks — to target American
citizens for <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/08/30/aclu-sues-obama-administration-over-alleged-assassination-plot/" target="_blank">assassination-by-CIA</a>, far from any battlefield. He has <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/05/23/110523fa_fact_mayer" target="_blank">waged</a>
an unprecedented war against whistleblowers, the protection of which
was once a liberal shibboleth. He rendered permanently irrelevant the
War Powers Resolution, a crown jewel in the list of post-Vietnam liberal
accomplishments, and thus enshrined the power of Presidents to wage war
even in the face of a <a href="http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/112/house/1/493" target="_blank">Congressional vote</a> against it. His obsession with secrecy is so extreme that it has become <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/2011-review-year-secrecy-jumped-shark" target="_blank">darkly laughable</a> in its manifestations, and he even worked to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/01/photos_8/" target="_blank">amend</a> the Freedom of Information Act (another crown jewel of liberal legislative successes) when compliance became inconvenient."<br>
<br><br>Of course this is exactly what is happening in our V2020 discussion about Ron Paul. I think it's worth noting that the Establishment Right does not oppose Obama on any of these atrocities, as they would do the same. Now here's the next excerpt:<br>
<br><br>"It’s perfectly rational and reasonable for progressives to decide
that the evils of their candidate are outweighed by the evils of the GOP
candidate, whether Ron Paul or anyone else. An honest line of reasoning
in this regard would go as follows:<br><br><br><blockquote><i>Yes,
I’m willing to continue to have Muslim children slaughtered by covert
drones and cluster bombs, and America’s minorities imprisoned by the
hundreds of thousands for no good reason, and the CIA able to run
rampant with no checks or transparency, and privacy eroded further by
the unchecked Surveillance State, and American citizens targeted by the
President for assassination with no due process, and whistleblowers
threatened with life imprisonment for “espionage,” and the Fed able to
dole out trillions to bankers in secret, and a substantially higher risk
of war with Iran (fought by the U.S. or by Israel with U.S. support) <b>in exchange for</b> less
severe cuts to Social Security, Medicare and other entitlement
programs, the preservation of the Education and Energy Departments, more
stringent environmental regulations, broader health care coverage,
defense of reproductive rights for women, stronger enforcement of civil
rights for America’s minorities, a President with no associations with
racist views in a newsletter, and a more progressive Supreme Court.</i><br><i><br></i><br></blockquote>Without my adopting it, <b>that</b>
is at least an honest, candid, and rational way to defend one’s choice.
It is the classic lesser-of-two-evils rationale, the key being that it
explicitly recognizes that both sides are “evil”: meaning it is not a
Good v. Evil contest but a More Evil v. Less Evil contest. But that is
not the discussion that takes place because few progressives want to
acknowledge that the candidate they are supporting — again — is someone
who will continue to do these evil things with their blessing. Instead,
we hear only a dishonest one-sided argument that emphasizes Paul’s evils
while ignoring Obama’s (progressives frequently ask: <i>how can any progressive consider an anti-choice candidate</i> but don’t ask themselves: <i>how can any progressive support a child-killing, secrecy-obsessed, whistleblower-persecuting Drug Warrior?</i>)."<br>
<br><br>I hear my friends say that they'll vote for Obama again, and he's the lesser of two evils. Well, I don't know how 'lesser' he is. I know when Bush was doing these things, I railed against him. Till now I've held my tongue about Obama, but I'm done with that.<br>
<br><br>If you think what I've posted above is wrong, and does not describe what we've seen from this administration, please show me how I'm wrong. I would very much like to be wrong. <br><br><br>Here's a link to the article.<br>
<br><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/progressives_and_the_ron_paul_fallacies/singleton/" target="_blank">http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/progressives_and_the_ron_paul_fallacies/singleton/</a><br><br>Sunil<br><br><div>
<div></div><hr>CC: <a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>From: <a href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com">thansen@moscow.com</a><br>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw: On Ron Paul and Racism<br>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 18:26:54 -0800<br>To: <a href="mailto:sunilramalingam@hotmail.com">sunilramalingam@hotmail.com</a><br><br><div>I admit that there are some of Ron Paul's concepts to which I agree, such as those mentioned by Sunil. However, those concepts are insufficient to attract my support when weighed against those concepts with which I disagree.</div>
<div><br></div><div>He is simply not the individual I want answering the 3:00 AM call in the White House.</div><div><br><div>Seeya later, Moscow.</div><div><br></div><div>Tom Hansen</div><div>Spokane, Washington</div><div>
<br></div><div>"If not us, who?</div><div>If not now, when?"</div><div><br></div><div>- Unknown</div></div><div><br>On Dec 31, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Sunil Ramalingam <<a href="mailto:sunilramalingam@hotmail.com">sunilramalingam@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br></div><div></div><blockquote><div><div dir="ltr">
Let's for one moment assume that Paul is a racist. I'm not saying he is, just assume he is so that issue doesn't need to be discussed for a minute.<br><br>Is he wrong on ending our wars? Is he wrong on cutting the defense budget? Is he wrong about the Patriot Act? Is he wrong about the Executive Branch seizing powers it should not have?<br>
<br>What say you, Keely, Wayne, Saundra, Tom?<br><br>Sunil<br><br><div><div></div><hr>Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 17:20:01 -0800<br>From: <a href="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com"></a><a href="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com">godshatter@yahoo.com</a><br>
To: <a href="mailto:deco@moscow.com"></a><a href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">deco@moscow.com</a><br>CC: <a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"></a><a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw: On Ron Paul and Racism<br><br>
<br>
He has admitted to putting out an investment newsletter that (as far
as I can tell) was not one of the newsletters that printed the
racist comments. It had all sorts of conspiracy theories about what
will happen to people trying to deal in large amounts of cash, most
of which have come true - just not in the way he thought. Try
taking a large pile of cash through airport security and see how
well that goes.<br>
<br>
Another distraction attempt, supposedly a smoking gun, apparently
succeeds in its goals. Or maybe this is just jumping on the
bandwagon, since it is the Daily Mail, after all.<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
<br>
On 12/31/2011 04:44 PM, Art Deco wrote:
<blockquote>
<div><font face="Verdana">See:</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Verdana"><a title="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2078217/Ron-Paul-racist-homophobic-newsletters-Video-taking-credit.html
CTRL
+ Click to follow link" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2078217/Ron-Paul-racist-homophobic-newsletters-Video-taking-credit.html" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2078217/Ron-Paul-racist-homophobic-newsletters-Video-taking-credit.html" target="_blank">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2078217/Ron-Paul-racist-homophobic-newsletters-Video-taking-credit.html</a></font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Verdana">Scroll down to see the videos
of Paul Himself acknowledging the letters, etc.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Verdana">All javascript scripts must be
allowed in order to see the whole article including the
videos.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Verdana">w.</font></div>
<div style="font:10pt Tahoma">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div><b>From:</b> <a title="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com
CTRL + Click to follow link" href="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com">Paul Rumelhart</a> </div>
<div><b>Sent:</b> Saturday, December 31, 2011 3:52 PM</div>
<div><b>To:</b> <a title="kjajmix1@msn.com" href="mailto:kjajmix1@msn.com">keely
emerinemix</a> </div>
<div><b>Cc:</b> <a title="vision2020@moscow.com" href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"></a><a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</a>
</div>
<div><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Vision2020] Fw: On Ron Paul and
Racism</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<br>
Does it matter whether or not the allegations are true? Or do we
just call them out anyway?<br>
<br>
Here is an article from CBS News about the newsletters: <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57345702-503544/ron-paul-disavows-racist-newsletters-under-his-name/" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57345702-503544/ron-paul-disavows-racist-newsletters-under-his-name/" target="_blank">http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57345702-503544/ron-paul-disavows-racist-newsletters-under-his-name/</a><br>
<br>
The article contains a quote by Ron Paul on the issue: <br>
<br>
"When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time, a
newsletter was published under my name that I did not edit.
Several writers contributed to the product," he said. "For over a
decade, I have publicly taken moral responsibility for not paying
closer attention to what went out under my name."<br>
<br>
I'd hate to see the man dragged over the coals for something he
might not have deserved solely because (for example) Jon Huntsman
is losing to Ron Paul in New Hampshire and has staked his campaign
on a strong showing there.<br>
<br>
I got that last bit from this article: <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57349712-503544/huntsman-calls-ron-paul-unelectable-because-of-racist-newsletters/" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57349712-503544/huntsman-calls-ron-paul-unelectable-because-of-racist-newsletters/" target="_blank">http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57349712-503544/huntsman-calls-ron-paul-unelectable-because-of-racist-newsletters/</a><br>
<br>
And once again, this is only out there in order to distract us.
These people could care less if it's even true. It's just
convenient.<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
<br>
On 12/31/2011 02:44 PM, keely emerinemix wrote:
<blockquote>
<div dir="ltr">I don't think you're defending racism, racist
behavior, or even the wrongness of screaming "He's a racist!"
at the slightest apparent provocation. That said, I think
it's imperative that legitimate indications that an
individual's views on race/gender/class/civil rights/culture
are bigoted be called out, examined, and condemned -- and I
believe that the text of Ron Paul's newsletters are an
example. <br>
<br>
<font color="#8064a2"><font style="font-size:12pt" size="3"><font face="Verdana">Keely<br>
<a href="http://www.keely-prevailingwinds.com" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.keely-prevailingwinds.com" target="_blank">www.keely-prevailingwinds.com</a><br>
</font></font></font><br>
<br>
<div>
<hr> Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Fw: On Ron
Paul and Racism<br>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:41:13 -0800<br>
From: <a href="mailto:jborden@datawedge.com"></a><a href="mailto:jborden@datawedge.com">jborden@datawedge.com</a><br>
To: <a href="mailto:kjajmix1@msn.com"></a><a href="mailto:kjajmix1@msn.com">kjajmix1@msn.com</a>; <a href="mailto:v2020@ssl1.fastmail.fm"></a><a href="mailto:v2020@ssl1.fastmail.fm">v2020@ssl1.fastmail.fm</a>;
<a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"></a><a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
<br>
<div>
<span style="font-family:'Calibri','sans-serif';color:rgb(31,73,125);font-size:11pt">I’m not *<b>defending</b>* racism,
I’m commenting on the mere finger-pointing and
accusations being so charged that it’s a nuclear
weapon in a political arsenal. </span><BR>
<span style="font-family:'Calibri','sans-serif';color:rgb(31,73,125);font-size:11pt"></span> <BR>
<span style="font-family:'Calibri','sans-serif';color:rgb(31,73,125);font-size:11pt">It’s used as a tool for distraction,
and hence, theatrics. (And, unless I missed the mark,
perhaps Mr. Rumelhart’s point).</span><BR>
<span style="font-family:'Calibri','sans-serif';color:rgb(31,73,125);font-size:11pt"></span> <BR>
<span style="font-family:'Calibri','sans-serif';color:rgb(31,73,125);font-size:11pt">Insert story of “crying wolf”.</span><BR>
<span style="font-family:'Calibri','sans-serif';color:rgb(31,73,125);font-size:11pt"></span> <BR>
<div>
<span style="font-family:'Calibri','sans-serif';color:rgb(31,73,125);font-size:11pt">Jay</span><BR>
</div>
<span style="font-family:'Calibri','sans-serif';color:rgb(31,73,125);font-size:11pt"></span> <BR>
<div>
<div>
<b><span style="font-family:'Tahoma','sans-serif';font-size:10pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-family:'Tahoma','sans-serif';font-size:10pt"> keely emerinemix [<a href="mailto:kjajmix1@msn.com"></a><a href="mailto:kjajmix1@msn.com">mailto:kjajmix1@msn.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, December 31, 2011 2:27 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Jay Borden; <a href="mailto:v2020@ssl1.fastmail.fm"></a><a href="mailto:v2020@ssl1.fastmail.fm">v2020@ssl1.fastmail.fm</a>;
<a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"></a><a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [Vision2020] Fw: On Ron Paul
and Racism</span><BR>
</div>
</div>
<BR>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom:12pt"><span style="font-family:'Tahoma','sans-serif';font-size:10pt">Jay, I would rue the day that
racist behavior and bigoted views become irrelevant
in how we choose our leaders. There are issues that
truly good people can disagree on; racism, however,
is never the view of a "truly good person," and in
fact ought to, by virtue of popular outcry,
immediately make a pariah out of the one who
embraces it.<br>
<br>
</span><span style="font-family:'Verdana','sans-serif';color:rgb(128,100,162)">Keely<br>
<a href="http://www.keely-prevailingwinds.com" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.keely-prevailingwinds.com" target="_blank">www.keely-prevailingwinds.com</a><br>
<br>
</span><span style="font-family:'Tahoma','sans-serif';font-size:10pt"></span></p>
<div>
<div style="text-align:center" align="center"><span style="font-family:'Tahoma','sans-serif';font-size:10pt">
<hr size="2" width="100%" align="center"> </span></div>
<p style="margin-bottom:12pt"><span style="font-family:'Tahoma','sans-serif';font-size:10pt">Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:17:33
-0800<br>
From: <a href="mailto:jborden@datawedge.com"></a><a href="mailto:jborden@datawedge.com">jborden@datawedge.com</a><br>
To: <a href="mailto:v2020@ssl1.fastmail.fm"></a><a href="mailto:v2020@ssl1.fastmail.fm">v2020@ssl1.fastmail.fm</a>;
<a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"></a><a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw: On Ron Paul and
Racism</span></p>
<div>
<span style="font-family:'Calibri','sans-serif';color:rgb(31,73,125);font-size:11pt">I would agree with Paul’s
statement… but I would word it a bit differently
to deflect some of the immediate hatred I’m sure
will be heading my way.</span><span style="font-family:'Tahoma','sans-serif';font-size:10pt"></span><BR>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote><blockquote><div><span>=======================================================</span><br><span> List services made available by First Step Internet,</span><br>
<span> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.</span><br><span> <a href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.net</a></span><br><span> <a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"></a><a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</a></span><br>
<span>=======================================================</span></div></blockquote></div> </div></div>
<br>=======================================================<br>
List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>
<a href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.net</a><br>
mailto:<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
=======================================================<br></blockquote></div><br>
<br>=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
=======================================================</div> </div></body>
</html>