<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19120"></HEAD>
<BODY style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
id=MailContainerBody leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area">
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>
<DIV id=fb-root></DIV>
<DIV class=header>
<DIV class=left><A href="http://www.nytimes.com/"><IMG border=0 hspace=0
alt="The New York Times" align=left
src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/nytlogo153x23.gif"></A>
<NYT_REPRINTS_FORM>
<LI class=reprints>
<FORM name=cccform
action=https://s100.copyright.com/CommonApp/LoadingApplication.jsp
target=_Icon></FORM></LI></DIV>
<DIV class=right> </DIV></DIV><BR clear=all>
<HR align=left SIZE=1>
<DIV class=timestamp>October 1, 2011</DIV>
<DIV class=kicker></DIV>
<H1><NYT_HEADLINE version="1.0" type=" ">Schmoozing in Whose
Interest?</NYT_HEADLINE></H1><NYT_BYLINE></NYT_BYLINE><NYT_TEXT>
<DIV id=articleBody><NYT_CORRECTION_TOP></NYT_CORRECTION_TOP>
<P>On his first day in office, President Obama struck a blow for better
government with his executive order banning political appointees from accepting
gifts from lobbyists. Now the administration is rightly proposing to extend the
ban to all 2.6 million career federal workers. </P>
<P>The ban, open to public comment until mid-November, would end the current
exception that lets a lobbyist provide a worker up to $50 worth of gifts,
including meals, entertainment and invitations to events, each year. </P>
<P>More significant, it would stop the practice of allowing federal employees
free admission to business and social functions sponsored by lobbyists if they
are deemed “widely attended.” In its proposed rules for the more stringent ban,
the Office of Government Ethics said the threat of that loophole was not so much
from “the brazen quid pro quo, but rather the cultivation of familiarity and
access” that lobbyists use as their stock in trade. </P>
<P>The proposal does not restrict career workers’ attendance at educational and
professional events. But the American League of Lobbyists is nevertheless
warning that the restriction will mean “the dumbing-down of government” by
reining in supposedly valuable interactions — as if receptions for lobbyists’
clients were ever founts of unbiased information. The league did offer a sound
criticism in noting that the ban affects only registered lobbyists while
ignoring nonprofit special-interest groups that can have ties to lobbying
organizations. They should be subject to the ban, too. </P>
<P>As proposed, the rule would codify the ban so that it would remain in place
beyond the Obama administration. Any successor who might want to rescind it
would then have to explain why he or she was determined to put the interests of
K Street above those of the rest of the country. </P><NYT_CORRECTION_BOTTOM>
<DIV
class=articleCorrection></DIV></NYT_CORRECTION_BOTTOM><NYT_UPDATE_BOTTOM></NYT_UPDATE_BOTTOM></DIV></NYT_TEXT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>__________________________</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>Wayne A. Fox<BR><A
href="mailto:wayne.a.fox@gmail.com">wayne.a.fox@gmail.com</A><BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>