<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=Windows-1252 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19120"></HEAD>
<BODY style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
id=MailContainerBody leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area">
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>Here is another item that Rumelhart and his
fellow co-chair of the Jim Wilson Fan Club, Gary Crabtree, can
celebrate:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>"Regular guy" Jim Wilson testified on behalf of
confessed wife murderer, deceiver, and body burner Silas Parks at a bail
hearing for Parks during that case.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>Now let's all join in a circle and sing "For He's
a Jolly Good Fellow" for Jim Wilson to congratulate him on his endearing,
God-loving habit of supporting male abusers against the interests of their
abused children/wives. What a prince! What a role
model!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>w.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
title="mailto:starbliss@gmail.com
CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:starbliss@gmail.com">Ted Moffett</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, October 02, 2011 1:15 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A
title="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com
CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com">Paul Rumelhart</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Cc:</B> <A
title="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com
CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Moscow Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] Top Ten 2010 Censored Stories: # 1: More
2010 U.S. Soldier Suicides Than Combat Deaths</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>You're much more amusing when trying to convince us that those
locally<BR>in positions of social and religious power, who promote a
sexist<BR>bigoted ideology, with real world political and social impacts
on<BR>peoples lives, are actually harmless nice guys, than when trying
to<BR>convince us that human impacts on climate are not a major problem,<BR>that
must be addressed<BR><BR>But really this is not funny at all, in either
case...<BR>------------------------------------------<BR>Vision2020 Post: Ted
Moffett<BR><BR>On 10/1/11, Paul Rumelhart <<A
href="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com">godshatter@yahoo.com</A>>
wrote:<BR><BR>> Given our current level of knowledge about the intricacies of
how the<BR>> climate works, I'd say that trying to manipulate the weather
right now would<BR>> be a text-book example of "a disaster waiting to
happen".<BR>><BR>> Also, until James Hansen can tell us exactly what set
of conditions or<BR>> events set off the last ice age with a high degree of
confidence, I really<BR>> don't think he should be telling us how confident
he is that the next one<BR>> will not happen. That just seems like
common sense to me.<BR>><BR>><BR>> Paul<BR>><BR>><BR>>
________________________________<BR>> From: Ted Moffett <<A
href="mailto:starbliss@gmail.com">starbliss@gmail.com</A>><BR>> To: Moscow
Vision 2020 <<A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A>><BR>> Sent:
Saturday, October 1, 2011 12:05 PM<BR>> Subject: [Vision2020] Top Ten 2010
Censored Stories: # 1: More 2010 U.S.<BR>> Soldier Suicides Than Combat
Deaths<BR>><BR>> The article below is in the most recent edition of the
Pacific<BR>> Northwest Inlander that is distributed free around Moscow
etc.<BR>><BR>> I found the # 9 censored story, "The government is
manipulating the<BR>> weather," to be ironically amusing, insofar as the
behavior of our<BR>> entire society, including government policies as they
influence this<BR>> behavior, is at this moment geo-engineering the Earth's
climate and<BR>> weather, increasing the magnitude of flooding, drought, heat
waves,<BR>> cryosphere ice loss, sea level rise, etc. via massive CO2
emissions<BR>> and other human behavior.<BR>><BR>> We have no rational
sane choice at this point in time--the genie is<BR>> out of the bottle--but
to deliberately geo-engineer the Earth's<BR>> climate to lessen catastrophic
impacts of anthropogenic global<BR>> warming, which the article does address
mentioning deliberate<BR>> injection of aerosals to reflect solar energy to
counter climate<BR>> change. Therefore indeed we need a deliberate
government program to<BR>> maniplate the weather, in one way or
another. For example,<BR>> deliberately planting trees to sequester CO2
is geo-engineering of<BR>> climate and weather.<BR>><BR>> Humanity now
has the unavoidable responsibility of a God, to engineer<BR>> the Earth's
climate. I recall NASA climate scientist James Hansen's<BR>> comment
that future major ice ages won't happen, unless humanity goes<BR>> extinct,
from his book "Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth About<BR>> the Coming
Climate Catastrophe and Our Last Chance to Save Humanity:"<BR>><BR>> "The
size of continental-scale ice sheets is mind-boggling. Although<BR>> thinner
toward the edges, ice over New York towered several times<BR>> higher than
the Empire State building--thick enough to crush<BR>> everything in today's
New York City to smithereens. But not to<BR>> worry--even though we sometimes
hear geoscientists talk as if ice ages<BR>> will occur again, it won't
happen--unless humans go extinct. Forces<BR>> instigating ice ages, as we
shall see, are so small and slow that a<BR>> single chlorofluorocarbon
factory would be more than sufficient to<BR>> overcome any natural tendency
toward an ice age. Ice sheets will not<BR>> descend over North America and
Europe as long as we are around to stop<BR>> them."<BR>>
---------------------------<BR>> But contrail generated cirrus clouds as
secret government military<BR>> weather control, even if there is substance
to this claim, seems a bit<BR>> overblown for a top ten censored
story.<BR>><BR>> <A
href="http://www.inlander.com/spokane/article-17011-downplayed.html">http://www.inlander.com/spokane/article-17011-downplayed.html</A><BR>><BR>>
Project Censored<BR>> Downplayed<BR>> Ten stories the mainstream media
ignored in the past year, according<BR>> to Project Censored.<BR>> Rebecca
Bowe<BR>><BR>> In an age of blogs, tweets, hacks and piles of beans
spilled by<BR>> WikiLeaks, the notion of media censorship may seem
dated.<BR>><BR>> But the rundown of stories Project Censored calls
attention to this<BR>> year serves as a reminder that mainstream media
outlets favoring the<BR>> superficial over the substantive don’t give us all
the information we<BR>> need.<BR>><BR>> Since 1976, Project Censored
has endeavored to spotlight important<BR>> news articles that didn’t find
their way into mainstream headlines.<BR>> Originating with a classroom
assignment at Sonoma State University,<BR>> the perennial project has evolved
into a book, a radio show, and the<BR>> Project Censored and Media Freedom
International websites, which<BR>> aggregate underreported independent news
stories from around the<BR>> globe.<BR>><BR>> Students and professors
engaged in unearthing oft-ignored stories,<BR>> part of a nationwide network
of affiliates working under the direction<BR>> of history professor Mickey
Huff, bring a harsh critique to standard<BR>> mainstream media
fare.<BR>><BR>> “Corporate media is the information control wing of the
global power<BR>> structure,” former Project Censored director Peter Phillips
writes in<BR>> the introduction to Censored 2012: Sourcebook for the
Media<BR>> Revolution. “The corporate media systematically censors the
news<BR>> stories that challenge the propaganda of empire.”<BR>><BR>>
In Huff’s words, “We try to highlight the things that are highly<BR>>
relevant, that seem to be conspicuously absent.”<BR>><BR>> Huff says the
selection process for the top censored stories begins<BR>> with nominations
of independent articles that readers feel warrant<BR>> greater attention than
they’ve received. From there, students comb<BR>> through LexisNexis or other
databases to see whether the stories have<BR>> been adequately covered. If
not, they fact-check the stories with<BR>> professors or other experts in the
field.<BR>><BR>> Once they’ve been “validated” in this way, they’re posted
to Project<BR>> Censored’s sister site, Media Freedom International. The Top
25<BR>> Censored Stories list is the result of a ranked-choice voting
process,<BR>> in which judges and affiliates select from the entire pool
of<BR>> validated news articles posted from April to April.<BR>> The end
product — an annual book featuring a compilation of the<BR>> censored stories
as well as sociological essays on media censorship<BR>> and scathing
critiques of “junk food news” churned out by the likes of<BR>> Fox News — can
be considered a kind of historical almanac, Huff says.<BR>><BR>>
“Journalism is the rough draft of history,” he notes, “and if you have<BR>>
these mainstream corporate news outlets getting so much of it wrong or<BR>>
missing it, how does that impact historical construction?”<BR>><BR>> For
the most part, Project Censored’s story list offers a sampling of<BR>> smart,
investigative journalism produced by the independent press.<BR>> They include
deep investigative pieces such as “Diet Hard With A<BR>> Vengeance,” by David
Moberg of In These Times, and a heartrending<BR>> portrayal by Chris Hedges
of a marine stationed in a mortuary unit in<BR>> Iraq.<BR>><BR>> Yet
there are instances when Project Censored seems to wander too far<BR>>
afield. Their claims of “censorship” seem dubious at times, as with<BR>> the
charge that the mainstream media has ignored the real unemployment<BR>> rate
because it hasn’t turned an eye toward the analysis of economist<BR>> John
Williams, who maintains a website called Shadow Government<BR>>
Statistics.<BR>><BR>> Huff and Phillips regularly discuss questions
surrounding the Sept.<BR>> 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center on
their KPFA radio show,<BR>> and their emphasis on this particular issue,
along with a recent<BR>> tendency to give weight to fringe theories
concerning things like<BR>> suspicious contrails issuing from airplanes, have
caused allies of the<BR>> organization to defect in the past.<BR>><BR>>
The organization’s definition of censorship has evolved, too, to the<BR>>
point where the authors cast it as a form of propaganda that is<BR>>
“intentional by nature ... In essence, this is a conspiracy.”<BR>><BR>>
Nevertheless, the Project Censored team delivers yet another rundown<BR>> of
surprising, alarming, and thought-provoking stories that are worth<BR>>
noting — more so, perhaps, because they received so little attention<BR>> to
begin with. Without further ado, here are the Top 10.<BR>><BR>> 1. More
U.S. soldiers committed suicide than died in combat in 2010<BR>><BR>> Six
more, to be exact. That’s the figure reported by Good magazine and<BR>>
spotlighted by Project Censored in an article highlighting the fact<BR>> that
462 American soldiers were killed in combat in 2010, while 468<BR>> soldiers,
counting enlisted men and women as well as veterans, took<BR>> their own
lives.<BR>><BR>> This was the second consecutive year that more soldiers
died by their<BR>> own hands than in combat — in 2009, the 381 suicides of
active-duty<BR>> soldiers recorded by the military also exceeded the number
of deaths<BR>> in battle. The Good report, which references Congressional
Quarterly<BR>> as a source, was published in January 2011, just weeks after
military<BR>> authorities announced that a psychological screening program
seemed to<BR>> be stemming the suicide rate among active-duty
soldiers.<BR>><BR>> “This new data, that American soldiers are now more
dangerous to<BR>> themselves than the insurgents, flies right in the face of
any<BR>> suggestion that things are ‘working,’” Good Senior Editor
Cord<BR>> Jefferson wrote.<BR>><BR>> Project Censored also spotlighted
Chris Hedges’ sobering portrayal of<BR>> Jess Goodell, a marine who was
stationed in the Mortuary Affairs unit<BR>> in Iraq. Goodell published a
memoir titled “Death and After in Iraq,”<BR>> which is also the name of
Hedges’ column.<BR>><BR>> 2. U.S. military’s “friend”
fake-out<BR>><BR>> Anyone suspicious of “sock puppets,” those online
commenters<BR>> pretending to be someone they’re not, would be unnerved by
the U.S.<BR>> military’s “online persona management service,” a little-known
program<BR>> described in the Guardian U.K., Raw Story and Computerworld
stories<BR>> unearthed and highlighted by Project Censored.<BR>><BR>>
The U.S. Central Command (Centcom) secured a contract with a Los<BR>>
Angeles-based tech company to develop the program, which enables U.S.<BR>>
service workers to use fake online personas on social media sites to<BR>>
influence online chatter. Using up to 10 false identities, they can<BR>>
counter charged political dialogue with pro-military propaganda.<BR>><BR>>
“These ‘personas’ were to have detailed, fictionalized backgrounds, to<BR>>
make them believable to outside observers, and a sophisticated<BR>> identity
protection service was to back them up, preventing suspicious<BR>> readers
from uncovering the real person behind the account,” according<BR>> to a Raw
Story account.<BR>><BR>> A Centcom spokesperson told the Guardian that the
program would only<BR>> intervene in online conversations in Arabic, Farsi,
Urdu or Pashto,<BR>> and that it wouldn’t initially target Twitter or
Facebook. However,<BR>> critics likened this U.S. endeavor to manipulate
social media to<BR>> China’s attempts to control and restrict free speech on
the Internet.<BR>><BR>> 3. Obama’s hit list<BR>><BR>> The Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the U.S. military have the<BR>> authority to
kill U.S. citizens abroad, outside war zones, if strong<BR>> evidence exists
that they’re involved in terrorist activity, the<BR>> Washington Post
reported in a front page story in January of 2010.<BR>><BR>> Despite this
prominent press treatment of targeted assassinations<BR>> under the Obama
administration, Project Censored deems this an<BR>> underreported news story,
because “a moral, ethical, and legal<BR>> analysis of the assassinations
seems to be significantly lacking<BR>> inside the corporate
media.”<BR>><BR>> The authors instead point us to coverage in Salon, the
Inter Press<BR>> Service, Common Dreams and several other sources that
sharply question<BR>> the president’s authority to license extrajudicial
executions of<BR>> individuals. In December of 2010, Human Rights Watch asked
for<BR>> clarification of the legal rationale behind this practice after
a<BR>> judge dismissed a lawsuit challenging the notion.<BR>><BR>>
Columnist Glenn Greenwald blasts the practice in Salon: “Bush merely<BR>>
imprisoned [Jose Padilla] for years without a trial. If that’s a<BR>>
vicious, tyrannical assault on the Constitution — and it was — what<BR>>
should they be saying about the Nobel Peace Prize winner’s<BR>> assassination
of American citizens without any due process?”<BR>><BR>> 4. Manmade food
crisis<BR>><BR>> David Moberg offers an in-depth breakdown of the global
food crisis<BR>> for In These Times in an article highlighted by Project
Censored,<BR>> touching on the environmental context of worsening droughts
and<BR>> flooding, as well as the economic ramifications of a system in
which<BR>> free-market speculators stand to profit from volatile food
prices.<BR>><BR>> Beyond crop reductions resulting from irregular weather
patterns,<BR>> Moberg places the blame for rising food prices and
increasing<BR>> malnutrition on flawed economic policies. “Hunger is
currently a<BR>> result of poverty and inequality, not lack of food,” he
concludes.<BR>><BR>> The food price index rose to its highest level since
1990 in February<BR>> 2011, according to a report by the Food and Agriculture
Organization<BR>> of the United Nations. “Since 2010 began, roughly another
44 million<BR>> people have quietly crossed the threshold into malnutrition,
joining<BR>> 925 million already suffering from lack of food,” Moberg writes.
“If<BR>> prices continue to rise, this food crisis will push the ranks of
the<BR>> hungry toward a billion people.”<BR>><BR>> 5. Prison companies
fund anti-immigrant legislation<BR>><BR>> When Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer ran
for re-election in 2010, her greatest<BR>> out-of-state campaign
contributions came from high-ranking executives<BR>> of Corrections
Corporation of America (CCA), one of the nation’s<BR>> largest prison
companies. Brewer gained notoriety among<BR>> immigrant-rights advocates
after championing Senate Bill 1070, strict<BR>> anti-illegal-immigration
legislation that drew criticism for<BR>> legitimizing racial
profiling.<BR>><BR>> The bill established new crimes and corresponding
prison sentences<BR>> relating to illegal immigration. CCA profits directly
from building<BR>> and operating prisons and detention
centers.<BR>><BR>> Bringing it closer to home, CCA previously employed two
of Brewer’s<BR>> legislative aides as lobbyists.<BR>><BR>> In a
Counterpunch article titled “Wall Street and the Criminalization<BR>> of
Immigrants” (spotlighted by Project Censored), Peter<BR>> Cervantes-Gautschi
explores Brewer’s links to CCA and goes deeper<BR>> still, offering an
historic account of how investors in CCA and prison<BR>> giant Geo Group
have, for years, actively pushed for legislation that<BR>> would result in
the widespread incarceration of undocumented<BR>> immigrants.<BR>><BR>>
6. Google spies?<BR>><BR>> A flurry of stories aired in the spring of 2010
when it became<BR>> apparent that Google Street View vehicles, in the process
of<BR>> collecting data for its mapping service, also picked up
consumer<BR>> “payload” data on Wi-Fi networks, including email messages,
website<BR>> data, user names and passwords.<BR>><BR>> The tech giant
publicly apologized for what it characterized as a<BR>> mistake, saying it
had “failed badly.” The Federal Trade Commission<BR>> (FTC) admonished Google
in a letter but declined to pursue it further.<BR>> From there, Project
Censored authors make the leap that the FTC<BR>> abandoned its inquiry
because, a week earlier, President Obama<BR>> attended a Democratic Party
fundraiser at the Palo Alto home of Google<BR>> executive Marissa Mayer,
citing a San Francisco Chronicle article<BR>> about the $30,000-per-person
affair.<BR>><BR>> Project Censored authors also point to an article by
Eric Sommer<BR>> titled “Google’s Deep CIA Connections,” which appeared on
Pravda.ru (a<BR>> website whose most-read article was “Bermuda Triangle: New
Anomalous<BR>> Phenomenon Discovered”). Sommer claims that “Google is, in
fact, a key<BR>> participant in U.S. military and CIA intelligence
operations,” basing<BR>> his argument on a perplexing set of links between
investors in Google<BR>> and CIA technologies.<BR>><BR>> 7. Stay
positive — at all costs<BR>><BR>> A military training program that Project
Censored has deemed “U.S.<BR>> Army and psychology’s largest experiment —
ever” was profiled in a<BR>> detailed American Psychologist series in early
2011. Comprehensive<BR>> Soldier Fitness (CSF) is described as a “holistic
approach to warrior<BR>> training,” emphasizing positive psychology as a
means to counter<BR>> mental health problems arising from horrific combat
situations.<BR>><BR>> While the American Psychologist series reads like a
puff piece<BR>> finessed by the professionals who developed CSF, Project
Censored<BR>> spotlighted articles in Truthout and The Psychology of
Wellbeing that<BR>> raised questions about the wisdom of launching a
required, untested<BR>> psychology program for more than 1 million soldiers —
one that<BR>> encourages soldiers to think positive even in the face of
traumatizing<BR>> events.<BR>><BR>> In an article appearing on
OpEdNews.com, authors Roy Eidelson, Marc<BR>> Pilisuk, and Stephen Soldz
write that the CSF “training” program would<BR>> better be described as a
research project. They point out that a<BR>> hypothesis of the program’s
success lies at the very core of CSF, “yet<BR>> it is merely a hypothesis — a
tentative explanation or prediction that<BR>> can only be confirmed through
further research.”<BR>><BR>> 8. The myth of clean nuclear
power<BR>><BR>> The terrifying meltdowns of Japan’s Fukushima nuclear
reactors<BR>> reignited a worldwide debate about the wisdom of relying on
nuclear<BR>> energy as an electricity source. While Germany opted to phase
out its<BR>> nuclear facilities by 2022 in the wake of the tragedy, the
U.S.<BR>> Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) came under scrutiny after a
Union<BR>> of Concerned Scientists report analyzed 14 “near misses” at
nuclear<BR>> power plants in 2010, revealing the shortcomings in NRC
inspections.<BR>><BR>> Project Censored’s critique of mainstream media’s
treatment of nuclear<BR>> power is that the media is too willing to endorse
the idea that<BR>> nuclear power is safe so long as proper safety measures
are in place,<BR>> and that major news publications readily go along with the
nuclear<BR>> industry’s branding of the power source as “clean” and
“carbon-free”<BR>> when it’s really not.<BR>><BR>> Claiming that “the
refrain of the corporate media” is that nuclear<BR>> power is “perfectly
harmless,” the authors spotlight a number of<BR>> articles and literature
from anti-nuclear nonprofit organizations<BR>> explaining the health hazards
of radiation, plus Jeff Goodell’s<BR>> “America’s Nuclear Nightmare,” an
in-depth Rolling Stone article<BR>> investigating ties between the NRC and
the nuclear industry.<BR>><BR>> 9. The government is manipulating the
weather<BR>><BR>> This one stretches credulity, and it’s probably the best
example of<BR>> why Project Censored has gained detractors even on the left
in recent<BR>> years. The authors point us to a Centre for Research on
Globalization<BR>> article titled, “Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather
Manipulation,<BR>> Contrails and Chemtrails,” by Rady Ananda, who begins by
informing<BR>> readers, “The military-industrial complex stands poised to
capitalize<BR>> on controlling the world’s weather.”<BR>><BR>> It
describes an “international symposium” held in Belgium in May of<BR>> 2010,
during which “scientists asserted that manipulation of climate<BR>> through
modification of cirrus clouds is neither a hoax nor a<BR>> conspiracy
theory,” and is “fully operational.”<BR>><BR>> That sounds rather serious,
but a web video of that symposium easily<BR>> located online offers a closer
look. One speaker begins by showing<BR>> slides of old paintings to
demonstrate “what the sky is supposed to<BR>> look like,” then offers
evidence of a chemtrail cover-up by quoting an<BR>> unnamed pilot who tells
someone in an online comment that he could<BR>> reveal the truth about
chemtrails but is bound by contract to shoot<BR>> anyone he
tells.<BR>><BR>> Scientific American and other publications have reported
that<BR>> geoengineering — spreading tiny atmospheric particles to
reflect<BR>> sunlight as a method to counter climate change — has actually
come<BR>> under serious consideration in recent years. Yet Project
Censored<BR>> seems to conflate this with a fringe obsession with
supposedly<BR>> suspicious airplane contrails.<BR>><BR>> 10. The “real”
unemployment rate<BR>><BR>> The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
calculates the “official<BR>> unemployment rate” by counting everyone who had
no job, was available<BR>> for work, and had actively sought work in the last
four weeks,<BR>> according to the BLS website. But alternative BLS
statistics<BR>> incorporate so-called “discouraged workers,” unemployed
individuals<BR>> who’ve given up on the job hunt.<BR>><BR>> In the
first four months of 2011, the national unemployment rate<BR>> officially
stood at around 9 percent, while a BLS statistic<BR>> incorporating
discouraged workers and the marginally employed bumped<BR>> that figure up to
15.9 percent.<BR>><BR>> However, Project Censored highlights an article by
Greg Hunter,<BR>> published on Information Clearinghouse, claiming that the
“real”<BR>> unemployment rate is actually 22.1 percent, or one out of five
U.S.<BR>> residents. Hunter’s claim is based on his interview with
San<BR>> Francisco-based economist John Williams, who maintains a
website<BR>> called Shadow Government Statistics.<BR>><BR>> By ignoring
the claims of this economist, Project Censored argues, the<BR>> mainstream
media is engaging in censorship.<BR>> As with several claims in this year’s
list, that may be stretching<BR>> things a bit.<BR>><BR>> Comments?
Write <A href="mailto:totheeditor@inlander.com">totheeditor@inlander.com</A>.
This article first appeared<BR>> in the San Francisco Bay Guardian.<BR>>
------------------------------------------<BR>> Vision2020 Post: Ted
Moffett<BR>><BR>>
=======================================================<BR>> List services
made available by First Step Internet,<BR>> serving the communities of the
Palouse since
1994.<BR>>
<A
href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A><BR>>
<A href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>>
=======================================================<BR><BR>=======================================================<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet,<BR> serving the communities
of the Palouse since
1994.<BR>
<A
href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A><BR>
<A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>=======================================================<BR></BODY></HTML>