<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
My entire thesis on Jim Wilson is that I found him to be a nice guy
and you guys are still upset about it.<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
<br>
On 10/02/2011 02:26 PM, Art Deco wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:9F254AFED5A0456EAF341691B8212866@cobra"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19120">
<div><font face="Verdana" size="2">Here is another item that
Rumelhart and his fellow co-chair of the Jim Wilson Fan Club,
Gary Crabtree, can celebrate:</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Verdana" size="2">"Regular guy" Jim Wilson
testified on behalf of confessed wife murderer, deceiver, and
body burner Silas Parks at a bail hearing for Parks during
that case.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Verdana" size="2">Now let's all join in a circle
and sing "For He's a Jolly Good Fellow" for Jim Wilson to
congratulate him on his endearing, God-loving habit of
supporting male abusers against the interests of their abused
children/wives. What a prince! What a role model!</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Verdana" size="2">w.</font></div>
<div style="font: 10pt Tahoma;">
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% rgb(245, 245,
245);">
<div style=""><b>From:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
title="mailto:starbliss@gmail.com
CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:starbliss@gmail.com">Ted Moffett</a> </div>
<div><b>Sent:</b> Sunday, October 02, 2011 1:15 PM</div>
<div><b>To:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
title="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com
CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com">Paul Rumelhart</a> </div>
<div><b>Cc:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
title="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com
CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Moscow Vision 2020</a>
</div>
<div><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Vision2020] Top Ten 2010 Censored
Stories: # 1: More 2010 U.S. Soldier Suicides Than Combat
Deaths</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
You're much more amusing when trying to convince us that those
locally<br>
in positions of social and religious power, who promote a sexist<br>
bigoted ideology, with real world political and social impacts on<br>
peoples lives, are actually harmless nice guys, than when trying
to<br>
convince us that human impacts on climate are not a major problem,<br>
that must be addressed<br>
<br>
But really this is not funny at all, in either case...<br>
------------------------------------------<br>
Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett<br>
<br>
On 10/1/11, Paul Rumelhart <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com">godshatter@yahoo.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
> Given our current level of knowledge about the intricacies of
how the<br>
> climate works, I'd say that trying to manipulate the weather
right now would<br>
> be a text-book example of "a disaster waiting to happen".<br>
><br>
> Also, until James Hansen can tell us exactly what set of
conditions or<br>
> events set off the last ice age with a high degree of
confidence, I really<br>
> don't think he should be telling us how confident he is that
the next one<br>
> will not happen. That just seems like common sense to me.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Paul<br>
><br>
><br>
> ________________________________<br>
> From: Ted Moffett <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:starbliss@gmail.com">starbliss@gmail.com</a>><br>
> To: Moscow Vision 2020 <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</a>><br>
> Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2011 12:05 PM<br>
> Subject: [Vision2020] Top Ten 2010 Censored Stories: # 1:
More 2010 U.S.<br>
> Soldier Suicides Than Combat Deaths<br>
><br>
> The article below is in the most recent edition of the
Pacific<br>
> Northwest Inlander that is distributed free around Moscow
etc.<br>
><br>
> I found the # 9 censored story, "The government is
manipulating the<br>
> weather," to be ironically amusing, insofar as the behavior
of our<br>
> entire society, including government policies as they
influence this<br>
> behavior, is at this moment geo-engineering the Earth's
climate and<br>
> weather, increasing the magnitude of flooding, drought, heat
waves,<br>
> cryosphere ice loss, sea level rise, etc. via massive CO2
emissions<br>
> and other human behavior.<br>
><br>
> We have no rational sane choice at this point in time--the
genie is<br>
> out of the bottle--but to deliberately geo-engineer the
Earth's<br>
> climate to lessen catastrophic impacts of anthropogenic
global<br>
> warming, which the article does address mentioning deliberate<br>
> injection of aerosals to reflect solar energy to counter
climate<br>
> change. Therefore indeed we need a deliberate government
program to<br>
> maniplate the weather, in one way or another. For example,<br>
> deliberately planting trees to sequester CO2 is
geo-engineering of<br>
> climate and weather.<br>
><br>
> Humanity now has the unavoidable responsibility of a God, to
engineer<br>
> the Earth's climate. I recall NASA climate scientist James
Hansen's<br>
> comment that future major ice ages won't happen, unless
humanity goes<br>
> extinct, from his book "Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth
About<br>
> the Coming Climate Catastrophe and Our Last Chance to Save
Humanity:"<br>
><br>
> "The size of continental-scale ice sheets is mind-boggling.
Although<br>
> thinner toward the edges, ice over New York towered several
times<br>
> higher than the Empire State building--thick enough to crush<br>
> everything in today's New York City to smithereens. But not
to<br>
> worry--even though we sometimes hear geoscientists talk as if
ice ages<br>
> will occur again, it won't happen--unless humans go extinct.
Forces<br>
> instigating ice ages, as we shall see, are so small and slow
that a<br>
> single chlorofluorocarbon factory would be more than
sufficient to<br>
> overcome any natural tendency toward an ice age. Ice sheets
will not<br>
> descend over North America and Europe as long as we are
around to stop<br>
> them."<br>
> ---------------------------<br>
> But contrail generated cirrus clouds as secret government
military<br>
> weather control, even if there is substance to this claim,
seems a bit<br>
> overblown for a top ten censored story.<br>
><br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.inlander.com/spokane/article-17011-downplayed.html">http://www.inlander.com/spokane/article-17011-downplayed.html</a><br>
><br>
> Project Censored<br>
> Downplayed<br>
> Ten stories the mainstream media ignored in the past year,
according<br>
> to Project Censored.<br>
> Rebecca Bowe<br>
><br>
> In an age of blogs, tweets, hacks and piles of beans spilled
by<br>
> WikiLeaks, the notion of media censorship may seem dated.<br>
><br>
> But the rundown of stories Project Censored calls attention
to this<br>
> year serves as a reminder that mainstream media outlets
favoring the<br>
> superficial over the substantive don’t give us all the
information we<br>
> need.<br>
><br>
> Since 1976, Project Censored has endeavored to spotlight
important<br>
> news articles that didn’t find their way into mainstream
headlines.<br>
> Originating with a classroom assignment at Sonoma State
University,<br>
> the perennial project has evolved into a book, a radio show,
and the<br>
> Project Censored and Media Freedom International websites,
which<br>
> aggregate underreported independent news stories from around
the<br>
> globe.<br>
><br>
> Students and professors engaged in unearthing oft-ignored
stories,<br>
> part of a nationwide network of affiliates working under the
direction<br>
> of history professor Mickey Huff, bring a harsh critique to
standard<br>
> mainstream media fare.<br>
><br>
> “Corporate media is the information control wing of the
global power<br>
> structure,” former Project Censored director Peter Phillips
writes in<br>
> the introduction to Censored 2012: Sourcebook for the Media<br>
> Revolution. “The corporate media systematically censors the
news<br>
> stories that challenge the propaganda of empire.”<br>
><br>
> In Huff’s words, “We try to highlight the things that are
highly<br>
> relevant, that seem to be conspicuously absent.”<br>
><br>
> Huff says the selection process for the top censored stories
begins<br>
> with nominations of independent articles that readers feel
warrant<br>
> greater attention than they’ve received. From there, students
comb<br>
> through LexisNexis or other databases to see whether the
stories have<br>
> been adequately covered. If not, they fact-check the stories
with<br>
> professors or other experts in the field.<br>
><br>
> Once they’ve been “validated” in this way, they’re posted to
Project<br>
> Censored’s sister site, Media Freedom International. The Top
25<br>
> Censored Stories list is the result of a ranked-choice voting
process,<br>
> in which judges and affiliates select from the entire pool of<br>
> validated news articles posted from April to April.<br>
> The end product — an annual book featuring a compilation of
the<br>
> censored stories as well as sociological essays on media
censorship<br>
> and scathing critiques of “junk food news” churned out by the
likes of<br>
> Fox News — can be considered a kind of historical almanac,
Huff says.<br>
><br>
> “Journalism is the rough draft of history,” he notes, “and if
you have<br>
> these mainstream corporate news outlets getting so much of it
wrong or<br>
> missing it, how does that impact historical construction?”<br>
><br>
> For the most part, Project Censored’s story list offers a
sampling of<br>
> smart, investigative journalism produced by the independent
press.<br>
> They include deep investigative pieces such as “Diet Hard
With A<br>
> Vengeance,” by David Moberg of In These Times, and a
heartrending<br>
> portrayal by Chris Hedges of a marine stationed in a mortuary
unit in<br>
> Iraq.<br>
><br>
> Yet there are instances when Project Censored seems to wander
too far<br>
> afield. Their claims of “censorship” seem dubious at times,
as with<br>
> the charge that the mainstream media has ignored the real
unemployment<br>
> rate because it hasn’t turned an eye toward the analysis of
economist<br>
> John Williams, who maintains a website called Shadow
Government<br>
> Statistics.<br>
><br>
> Huff and Phillips regularly discuss questions surrounding the
Sept.<br>
> 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center on their KPFA
radio show,<br>
> and their emphasis on this particular issue, along with a
recent<br>
> tendency to give weight to fringe theories concerning things
like<br>
> suspicious contrails issuing from airplanes, have caused
allies of the<br>
> organization to defect in the past.<br>
><br>
> The organization’s definition of censorship has evolved, too,
to the<br>
> point where the authors cast it as a form of propaganda that
is<br>
> “intentional by nature ... In essence, this is a conspiracy.”<br>
><br>
> Nevertheless, the Project Censored team delivers yet another
rundown<br>
> of surprising, alarming, and thought-provoking stories that
are worth<br>
> noting — more so, perhaps, because they received so little
attention<br>
> to begin with. Without further ado, here are the Top 10.<br>
><br>
> 1. More U.S. soldiers committed suicide than died in combat
in 2010<br>
><br>
> Six more, to be exact. That’s the figure reported by Good
magazine and<br>
> spotlighted by Project Censored in an article highlighting
the fact<br>
> that 462 American soldiers were killed in combat in 2010,
while 468<br>
> soldiers, counting enlisted men and women as well as
veterans, took<br>
> their own lives.<br>
><br>
> This was the second consecutive year that more soldiers died
by their<br>
> own hands than in combat — in 2009, the 381 suicides of
active-duty<br>
> soldiers recorded by the military also exceeded the number of
deaths<br>
> in battle. The Good report, which references Congressional
Quarterly<br>
> as a source, was published in January 2011, just weeks after
military<br>
> authorities announced that a psychological screening program
seemed to<br>
> be stemming the suicide rate among active-duty soldiers.<br>
><br>
> “This new data, that American soldiers are now more dangerous
to<br>
> themselves than the insurgents, flies right in the face of
any<br>
> suggestion that things are ‘working,’” Good Senior Editor
Cord<br>
> Jefferson wrote.<br>
><br>
> Project Censored also spotlighted Chris Hedges’ sobering
portrayal of<br>
> Jess Goodell, a marine who was stationed in the Mortuary
Affairs unit<br>
> in Iraq. Goodell published a memoir titled “Death and After
in Iraq,”<br>
> which is also the name of Hedges’ column.<br>
><br>
> 2. U.S. military’s “friend” fake-out<br>
><br>
> Anyone suspicious of “sock puppets,” those online commenters<br>
> pretending to be someone they’re not, would be unnerved by
the U.S.<br>
> military’s “online persona management service,” a
little-known program<br>
> described in the Guardian U.K., Raw Story and Computerworld
stories<br>
> unearthed and highlighted by Project Censored.<br>
><br>
> The U.S. Central Command (Centcom) secured a contract with a
Los<br>
> Angeles-based tech company to develop the program, which
enables U.S.<br>
> service workers to use fake online personas on social media
sites to<br>
> influence online chatter. Using up to 10 false identities,
they can<br>
> counter charged political dialogue with pro-military
propaganda.<br>
><br>
> “These ‘personas’ were to have detailed, fictionalized
backgrounds, to<br>
> make them believable to outside observers, and a
sophisticated<br>
> identity protection service was to back them up, preventing
suspicious<br>
> readers from uncovering the real person behind the account,”
according<br>
> to a Raw Story account.<br>
><br>
> A Centcom spokesperson told the Guardian that the program
would only<br>
> intervene in online conversations in Arabic, Farsi, Urdu or
Pashto,<br>
> and that it wouldn’t initially target Twitter or Facebook.
However,<br>
> critics likened this U.S. endeavor to manipulate social media
to<br>
> China’s attempts to control and restrict free speech on the
Internet.<br>
><br>
> 3. Obama’s hit list<br>
><br>
> The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the U.S. military
have the<br>
> authority to kill U.S. citizens abroad, outside war zones, if
strong<br>
> evidence exists that they’re involved in terrorist activity,
the<br>
> Washington Post reported in a front page story in January of
2010.<br>
><br>
> Despite this prominent press treatment of targeted
assassinations<br>
> under the Obama administration, Project Censored deems this
an<br>
> underreported news story, because “a moral, ethical, and
legal<br>
> analysis of the assassinations seems to be significantly
lacking<br>
> inside the corporate media.”<br>
><br>
> The authors instead point us to coverage in Salon, the Inter
Press<br>
> Service, Common Dreams and several other sources that sharply
question<br>
> the president’s authority to license extrajudicial executions
of<br>
> individuals. In December of 2010, Human Rights Watch asked
for<br>
> clarification of the legal rationale behind this practice
after a<br>
> judge dismissed a lawsuit challenging the notion.<br>
><br>
> Columnist Glenn Greenwald blasts the practice in Salon: “Bush
merely<br>
> imprisoned [Jose Padilla] for years without a trial. If
that’s a<br>
> vicious, tyrannical assault on the Constitution — and it was
— what<br>
> should they be saying about the Nobel Peace Prize winner’s<br>
> assassination of American citizens without any due process?”<br>
><br>
> 4. Manmade food crisis<br>
><br>
> David Moberg offers an in-depth breakdown of the global food
crisis<br>
> for In These Times in an article highlighted by Project
Censored,<br>
> touching on the environmental context of worsening droughts
and<br>
> flooding, as well as the economic ramifications of a system
in which<br>
> free-market speculators stand to profit from volatile food
prices.<br>
><br>
> Beyond crop reductions resulting from irregular weather
patterns,<br>
> Moberg places the blame for rising food prices and increasing<br>
> malnutrition on flawed economic policies. “Hunger is
currently a<br>
> result of poverty and inequality, not lack of food,” he
concludes.<br>
><br>
> The food price index rose to its highest level since 1990 in
February<br>
> 2011, according to a report by the Food and Agriculture
Organization<br>
> of the United Nations. “Since 2010 began, roughly another 44
million<br>
> people have quietly crossed the threshold into malnutrition,
joining<br>
> 925 million already suffering from lack of food,” Moberg
writes. “If<br>
> prices continue to rise, this food crisis will push the ranks
of the<br>
> hungry toward a billion people.”<br>
><br>
> 5. Prison companies fund anti-immigrant legislation<br>
><br>
> When Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer ran for re-election in 2010, her
greatest<br>
> out-of-state campaign contributions came from high-ranking
executives<br>
> of Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), one of the
nation’s<br>
> largest prison companies. Brewer gained notoriety among<br>
> immigrant-rights advocates after championing Senate Bill
1070, strict<br>
> anti-illegal-immigration legislation that drew criticism for<br>
> legitimizing racial profiling.<br>
><br>
> The bill established new crimes and corresponding prison
sentences<br>
> relating to illegal immigration. CCA profits directly from
building<br>
> and operating prisons and detention centers.<br>
><br>
> Bringing it closer to home, CCA previously employed two of
Brewer’s<br>
> legislative aides as lobbyists.<br>
><br>
> In a Counterpunch article titled “Wall Street and the
Criminalization<br>
> of Immigrants” (spotlighted by Project Censored), Peter<br>
> Cervantes-Gautschi explores Brewer’s links to CCA and goes
deeper<br>
> still, offering an historic account of how investors in CCA
and prison<br>
> giant Geo Group have, for years, actively pushed for
legislation that<br>
> would result in the widespread incarceration of undocumented<br>
> immigrants.<br>
><br>
> 6. Google spies?<br>
><br>
> A flurry of stories aired in the spring of 2010 when it
became<br>
> apparent that Google Street View vehicles, in the process of<br>
> collecting data for its mapping service, also picked up
consumer<br>
> “payload” data on Wi-Fi networks, including email messages,
website<br>
> data, user names and passwords.<br>
><br>
> The tech giant publicly apologized for what it characterized
as a<br>
> mistake, saying it had “failed badly.” The Federal Trade
Commission<br>
> (FTC) admonished Google in a letter but declined to pursue it
further.<br>
> From there, Project Censored authors make the leap that the
FTC<br>
> abandoned its inquiry because, a week earlier, President
Obama<br>
> attended a Democratic Party fundraiser at the Palo Alto home
of Google<br>
> executive Marissa Mayer, citing a San Francisco Chronicle
article<br>
> about the $30,000-per-person affair.<br>
><br>
> Project Censored authors also point to an article by Eric
Sommer<br>
> titled “Google’s Deep CIA Connections,” which appeared on
Pravda.ru (a<br>
> website whose most-read article was “Bermuda Triangle: New
Anomalous<br>
> Phenomenon Discovered”). Sommer claims that “Google is, in
fact, a key<br>
> participant in U.S. military and CIA intelligence
operations,” basing<br>
> his argument on a perplexing set of links between investors
in Google<br>
> and CIA technologies.<br>
><br>
> 7. Stay positive — at all costs<br>
><br>
> A military training program that Project Censored has deemed
“U.S.<br>
> Army and psychology’s largest experiment — ever” was profiled
in a<br>
> detailed American Psychologist series in early 2011.
Comprehensive<br>
> Soldier Fitness (CSF) is described as a “holistic approach to
warrior<br>
> training,” emphasizing positive psychology as a means to
counter<br>
> mental health problems arising from horrific combat
situations.<br>
><br>
> While the American Psychologist series reads like a puff
piece<br>
> finessed by the professionals who developed CSF, Project
Censored<br>
> spotlighted articles in Truthout and The Psychology of
Wellbeing that<br>
> raised questions about the wisdom of launching a required,
untested<br>
> psychology program for more than 1 million soldiers — one
that<br>
> encourages soldiers to think positive even in the face of
traumatizing<br>
> events.<br>
><br>
> In an article appearing on OpEdNews.com, authors Roy
Eidelson, Marc<br>
> Pilisuk, and Stephen Soldz write that the CSF “training”
program would<br>
> better be described as a research project. They point out
that a<br>
> hypothesis of the program’s success lies at the very core of
CSF, “yet<br>
> it is merely a hypothesis — a tentative explanation or
prediction that<br>
> can only be confirmed through further research.”<br>
><br>
> 8. The myth of clean nuclear power<br>
><br>
> The terrifying meltdowns of Japan’s Fukushima nuclear
reactors<br>
> reignited a worldwide debate about the wisdom of relying on
nuclear<br>
> energy as an electricity source. While Germany opted to phase
out its<br>
> nuclear facilities by 2022 in the wake of the tragedy, the
U.S.<br>
> Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) came under scrutiny after
a Union<br>
> of Concerned Scientists report analyzed 14 “near misses” at
nuclear<br>
> power plants in 2010, revealing the shortcomings in NRC
inspections.<br>
><br>
> Project Censored’s critique of mainstream media’s treatment
of nuclear<br>
> power is that the media is too willing to endorse the idea
that<br>
> nuclear power is safe so long as proper safety measures are
in place,<br>
> and that major news publications readily go along with the
nuclear<br>
> industry’s branding of the power source as “clean” and
“carbon-free”<br>
> when it’s really not.<br>
><br>
> Claiming that “the refrain of the corporate media” is that
nuclear<br>
> power is “perfectly harmless,” the authors spotlight a number
of<br>
> articles and literature from anti-nuclear nonprofit
organizations<br>
> explaining the health hazards of radiation, plus Jeff
Goodell’s<br>
> “America’s Nuclear Nightmare,” an in-depth Rolling Stone
article<br>
> investigating ties between the NRC and the nuclear industry.<br>
><br>
> 9. The government is manipulating the weather<br>
><br>
> This one stretches credulity, and it’s probably the best
example of<br>
> why Project Censored has gained detractors even on the left
in recent<br>
> years. The authors point us to a Centre for Research on
Globalization<br>
> article titled, “Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather
Manipulation,<br>
> Contrails and Chemtrails,” by Rady Ananda, who begins by
informing<br>
> readers, “The military-industrial complex stands poised to
capitalize<br>
> on controlling the world’s weather.”<br>
><br>
> It describes an “international symposium” held in Belgium in
May of<br>
> 2010, during which “scientists asserted that manipulation of
climate<br>
> through modification of cirrus clouds is neither a hoax nor a<br>
> conspiracy theory,” and is “fully operational.”<br>
><br>
> That sounds rather serious, but a web video of that symposium
easily<br>
> located online offers a closer look. One speaker begins by
showing<br>
> slides of old paintings to demonstrate “what the sky is
supposed to<br>
> look like,” then offers evidence of a chemtrail cover-up by
quoting an<br>
> unnamed pilot who tells someone in an online comment that he
could<br>
> reveal the truth about chemtrails but is bound by contract to
shoot<br>
> anyone he tells.<br>
><br>
> Scientific American and other publications have reported that<br>
> geoengineering — spreading tiny atmospheric particles to
reflect<br>
> sunlight as a method to counter climate change — has actually
come<br>
> under serious consideration in recent years. Yet Project
Censored<br>
> seems to conflate this with a fringe obsession with
supposedly<br>
> suspicious airplane contrails.<br>
><br>
> 10. The “real” unemployment rate<br>
><br>
> The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) calculates the
“official<br>
> unemployment rate” by counting everyone who had no job, was
available<br>
> for work, and had actively sought work in the last four
weeks,<br>
> according to the BLS website. But alternative BLS statistics<br>
> incorporate so-called “discouraged workers,” unemployed
individuals<br>
> who’ve given up on the job hunt.<br>
><br>
> In the first four months of 2011, the national unemployment
rate<br>
> officially stood at around 9 percent, while a BLS statistic<br>
> incorporating discouraged workers and the marginally employed
bumped<br>
> that figure up to 15.9 percent.<br>
><br>
> However, Project Censored highlights an article by Greg
Hunter,<br>
> published on Information Clearinghouse, claiming that the
“real”<br>
> unemployment rate is actually 22.1 percent, or one out of
five U.S.<br>
> residents. Hunter’s claim is based on his interview with San<br>
> Francisco-based economist John Williams, who maintains a
website<br>
> called Shadow Government Statistics.<br>
><br>
> By ignoring the claims of this economist, Project Censored
argues, the<br>
> mainstream media is engaging in censorship.<br>
> As with several claims in this year’s list, that may be
stretching<br>
> things a bit.<br>
><br>
> Comments? Write <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:totheeditor@inlander.com">totheeditor@inlander.com</a>.
This article first appeared<br>
> in the San Francisco Bay Guardian.<br>
> ------------------------------------------<br>
> Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett<br>
><br>
> =======================================================<br>
> List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</a><br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
> =======================================================<br>
<br>
=======================================================<br>
List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
=======================================================<br>
<pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</a>
=======================================================</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>