<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:18pt"><div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto">Ron,</SPAN></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto"></SPAN> </div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto">I think you need to reread my proposal. There are no limits on what a candidate can spend or collect. Nor is it upping the public contribution over which candidate makes more, <SPAN style="RIGHT: auto" id=misspell-0><SPAN>necessarily</SPAN></SPAN>, the regulation <VAR id=yui-ie-cursor></VAR>determines public funds based on <B><EM>how </EM></B>money is collected. </SPAN></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto">If a candidate that collects $10 million from foreign governments and a candidate with $15 million collected according to the public <SPAN style="RIGHT: auto" id=misspell-1><SPAN>distribution</SPAN></SPAN> of funds, the one with $15 million would get the greater amount because they followed the preset rules. </SPAN></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto"></SPAN> </div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto">There are already laws limiting how money is collected and how public funds are <SPAN style="RIGHT: auto" id=misspell-2><SPAN>dispersed</SPAN></SPAN>. If it wasn't, not allowing bribery would be a violation of free speech. </SPAN></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto"></SPAN> </div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto">The recent ruling doesn't address this.</SPAN></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto"></SPAN> </div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><SPAN style="RIGHT: auto">Donovan Arnold</SPAN></div>
<div><BR></div>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 18pt">
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: 0; MARGIN: 5px 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; HEIGHT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 0px; BORDER-TOP: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 0px" class=hr contentEditable=false readonly="true"></DIV><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> Ron Force <rforce2003@yahoo.com><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> "vision2020@moscow.com" <vision2020@moscow.com><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Sunday, October 2, 2011 8:11 PM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Re: [Vision2020] How to Limit Lobbyist Influence<BR></FONT><BR>
<DIV id=yiv1423729564>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; COLOR: #000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV><SPAN>Unfortunately, Donovan, there are a couple of problems with this idea.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><BR><SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN>1. There are no limits on spending in a congressional campaign. If it should pass somehow, I'm sure the Supreme Court would find it suspect. After all, money = political speech, and </SPAN><SPAN>(money) </SPAN><SPAN>speech should be unfettered.<BR></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><BR><SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN>2. This year, the Roberts (Supreme) Court struck down an Arizona law that did exactly what you were suggesting: upping the public contribution to candidates who were outspent by their opponents. The court held that it unconstitutionally limited the free (spending) speech rights of the candidate with more money.<BR></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Ron Force<BR>Moscow Idaho USA<BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: 0; MARGIN: 5px 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; HEIGHT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 0px; BORDER-TOP: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 0px" class=hr contentEditable=false readonly="true"></DIV><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> "vision2020@moscow.com" <vision2020@moscow.com><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Sunday, October 2, 2011 6:27 PM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> [Vision2020] How to Limit Lobbyist Influence<BR></FONT><BR>
<DIV id=yiv1423729564>
<DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; COLOR: #000; FONT-SIZE: 18pt">
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal align=center><FONT size=3>How to Limit Lobbyist Influence</FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3>There is a simple way to limit the influence of lobbyists on our elected office holders. Give their leading opponents two-for-one matching public dollars that go over the preset limits. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3>For example, if a US Senate campaign is limited to $50 million and a candidate raises $60 million, $10 million over the limit, his opponent would get $20 million. No candidate would be willing to go over the limit because they would be aiding their opponent more than they would their own campaign, thus costing the taxpayer nothing. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3>With politicians unwilling to accept more donations, the power of lobbyists would be significantly diminished. Further regulations could also be added to ensure greater influence of the people and less on special interest groups;</FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3>A limit of 50% of total donations could be from corporations. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3>50% of donations must come from individuals inside their districts. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3>No more than 10% can come from one source including their own wealth and family. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3>75% of all donations must be from their district, neighboring districts or state. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3>No more than 5% of donations could come from foreign sources. Foreign sources would include businesses owned by more than 50% by non-US Citizens, or businesses who have the majority of their employees overseas. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3>The Supreme Court may have made it illegal to limit how much a person, business, or organization can donate, citing a violation of freed<VAR id=yiv1423729564yui-ie-cursor></VAR>om of speech. However, the courts cannot compel a candidate to accept donations. Nor can the court tell the taxpayer that they cannot award candidates sums of their money for reasons they deem appropriate, it is their money. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3>Lobbyists would still have influence, but it would never be more than 50% of the Congressional concern. And no one person, business, or special interest would control more than 10% of a candidate. The primary role of the lobbyist would be doing what they claim they are great at, giving members of Congress information to make informed decisions, but without the piles of cash next to the information. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3>Donovan Arnold</FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><I><FONT size=3>BS, Political Science, University of Idaho</FONT></I></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class=yiv1423729564MsoNormal><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV><BR>=======================================================<BR>List services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<BR> <A href="http://www.fsr.net/" rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://www.fsr.net</A><BR> mailto:<A href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com" rel=nofollow target=_blank ymailto="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>=======================================================<BR><BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV><BR>=======================================================<BR>List services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<BR> <A href="http://www.fsr.net/" target=_blank>http://www.fsr.net</A><BR> mailto:<A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com" ymailto="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>=======================================================<BR><BR></DIV></DIV></div></body></html>