<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7655.1">
<TITLE>RE: [Vision2020] Fw: Idaho Faculty Salary Survey</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Dear Anonymous Wayne:<BR>
<BR>
Tenured professors can be fired for professional incompetence, moral turpitude (my favorite), a felony conviction, financial exigency, and if their department or unit has been eliminated for, example, lack of enrollment.<BR>
<BR>
It used to be that a tenure review could be triggered by an individual faculty member, a department, or a dean. Now it is the prerogative of the UI Provost and we recently begged him to review the tenured professor who most likely committed a felony, but he refused to.<BR>
<BR>
Many years ago a tenure review committee recommended the dismissal of a incompetent professor. The administration refused to act on the faculty recommendation.<BR>
<BR>
Administrators are responsible for signing off on the granting of tenure and if they cannot enforce the tenure review process, then it is their fault not the faculty's.<BR>
<BR>
Very glad that tenure protects academic freedom in Tea Party Times,<BR>
<BR>
Nick<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: vision2020-bounces@moscow.com on behalf of Sue Hovey<BR>
Sent: Wed 6/15/2011 11:55 AM<BR>
To: 'Vision 2020'<BR>
Subject: [Vision2020] Fw: Idaho Faculty Salary Survey<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Sue Hovey<BR>
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:54 AM<BR>
To: Wayne<BR>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Idaho Faculty Salary Survey<BR>
<BR>
Dean Anonymous Wayne,<BR>
<BR>
I am. He is.<BR>
<BR>
Sue H.<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Wayne<BR>
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:19 AM<BR>
To: Sue Hovey<BR>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Idaho Faculty Salary Survey<BR>
<BR>
Give me a break Sue...I've been to college. Many of the professors aren't<BR>
worth half their pay, yet they can't be fired because they have tenure. If<BR>
the governor isn't doing his job he CAN be fired. We have the opportunity<BR>
every 4 years. Your argument that the governor is "hell-bent on destroying<BR>
education" is ridiculous. You sound like the typical left-winger.<BR>
<BR>
--- On Mon, 6/13/11, Sue Hovey <suehovey@moscow.com> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
> From: Sue Hovey <suehovey@moscow.com><BR>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Idaho Faculty Salary Survey<BR>
> To: "lfalen" <lfalen@turbonet.com>, "Tom Hansen" <thansen@moscow.com><BR>
> Cc: "Moscow Vision 2020" <vision2020@moscow.com><BR>
> Date: Monday, June 13, 2011, 12:31 PM<BR>
> To paraphrase the weekend headlines,<BR>
> "Some Professors Make More Than the<BR>
> Governor," I can only add, THANK GOD. I can<BR>
> think of not one of them so<BR>
> hell-bent on destroying education in the State of Idaho as<BR>
> is he. Even so,<BR>
> too bad educators (k through higher ed) aren't valued as<BR>
> NFL football<BR>
> players--the ones who do the work and draw the crowds get<BR>
> the money.<BR>
><BR>
> Sue H.<BR>
><BR>
> -----Original Message-----<BR>
> From: lfalen<BR>
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 11:13 AM<BR>
> To: Tom Hansen<BR>
> Cc: Moscow Vision 2020<BR>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Idaho Faculty Salary Survey<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> I agree with you on jobs, but not entirely on who's fault<BR>
> it is. I think is<BR>
> is both parties.<BR>
> Roger<BR>
> -----Original message-----<BR>
> From: "Tom Hansen" thansen@moscow.com<BR>
> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:43:30 -0700<BR>
> To: "lfalen" lfalen@turbonet.com<BR>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Idaho Faculty Salary Survey<BR>
><BR>
> > What has been preached and has proven out time after<BR>
> time after time after<BR>
> > . .<BR>
> ><BR>
> > Increased cash flow improves the economy.<BR>
> ><BR>
> > And just what increases cash flow, you ask?<BR>
> ><BR>
> > J - O - B - S<BR>
> ><BR>
> > When people have jobs they tend to spend more money<BR>
> than when they are<BR>
> > unemployed.<BR>
> ><BR>
> > However, it seems that ever since the Republicans have<BR>
> become the ruling<BR>
> > party of the House (after preaching jobs, jobs, jobs<BR>
> during the 2010<BR>
> > campaigns), they have yet to introduce one singular<BR>
> jobs-oriented bill.<BR>
> ><BR>
> > So . . . tell me where the fault lies (pun intended).<BR>
> ><BR>
> > Tom "Thank God I'm re-'tired'" Hansen<BR>
> > Moscow, Idaho<BR>
> ><BR>
> ><BR>
> ><BR>
> ><BR>
> > On Mon, June 13, 2011 10:17 am, lfalen wrote:<BR>
> > > Joe<BR>
> > > I am retired, so I am not getting a paycheck from<BR>
> any company. I do get<BR>
> > > Social Security and there has not been a cola for<BR>
> two years, but the<BR>
> > > cost<BR>
> > > of living keeps going up. I probably earn<BR>
> less than half what you do. I<BR>
> > > am willing to accept less money.<BR>
> I just think that it should apply to<BR>
> > > everyone. My wife asked for a furlough to help<BR>
> make the budget. Instead<BR>
> > > or<BR>
> > > that. she was cut to 87% in pay. She gets payed<BR>
> for 7 hours a day but<BR>
> > > puts in 12. She may be cut to 50% in January, in<BR>
> which case the UI will<BR>
> > > not pay benefits. I think that everyone should be<BR>
> affected. It offends<BR>
> > > me<BR>
> > > that you think that it fine for you to get a pay<BR>
> increase and to hell<BR>
> > > with<BR>
> > > anyone else.<BR>
> > > Roger<BR>
> > > -----Original message-----<BR>
> > > From: Joe Campbell philosopher.joe@gmail.com<BR>
> > > Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:04:33 -0700<BR>
> > > To: lfalen lfalen@turbonet.com<BR>
> > > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Idaho Faculty Salary<BR>
> Survey<BR>
> > ><BR>
> > >> Have you asked for a salary decrease<BR>
> recently, Roger? Who besides<BR>
> > >> teachers<BR>
> > >> should ask for a salary decrease? Anyone?<BR>
> Just government officials?<BR>
> > >> Not<BR>
> > >> cashiers to reduce food costs? That might<BR>
> help, too! Why don't we all<BR>
> > >> just<BR>
> > >> ask for less money?<BR>
> > >><BR>
> > >> As a teacher, I'm offended by your request.<BR>
> It is fine with me if YOU<BR>
> > >> ask<BR>
> > >> for a salary decrease but please don't tell<BR>
> me that I should do it. All<BR>
> > >> that<BR>
> > >> indicates is a disrespect and lack of<BR>
> appreciation for education.<BR>
> > >><BR>
> > >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:50 AM, lfalen<BR>
> <lfalen@turbonet.com><BR>
> wrote:<BR>
> > >><BR>
> > >> > Nick<BR>
> > >> > I agree with you 100% on the pay of<BR>
> administrators. In addition to<BR>
> > >> them<BR>
> > >> > being payed to much there are too many<BR>
> oif them. To argue that Idaho<BR>
> > >> faculty<BR>
> > >> > salaries are not keeping up with other<BR>
> state is a valid point.<BR>
> > >> > However<BR>
> > >> we<BR>
> > >> > are a small state and should live within<BR>
> our means. My wife who is UI<BR>
> > >> staff<BR>
> > >> > has been reduced to 87% of her<BR>
> normal salary. This means she she<BR>
> > >> > gets<BR>
> > >> paid<BR>
> > >> > for 7 hours a day. She puts in about 12<BR>
> hours a day. She would have<BR>
> > >> been<BR>
> > >> > reduced to 50% on July 1. She with the<BR>
> help of our daughter, who<BR>
> > >> > works<BR>
> > >> for<BR>
> > >> > the Idaho Soils Commission was<BR>
> able to line up a Nitrate study on<BR>
> > >> > the<BR>
> > >> Camus<BR>
> > >> > Prairie. This will be done with farmer<BR>
> cooperators in the area. This<BR>
> > >> will<BR>
> > >> > allow her to stay at 87% until January.<BR>
> > >> > I understand the desire for wanting pay<BR>
> increases as the cost of<BR>
> > >> living is<BR>
> > >> > going up, however in hard times everyone<BR>
> should share the burden.<BR>
> > >> This<BR>
> > >> > should also apply to the county budget<BR>
> and to the schools. The county<BR>
> > >> should<BR>
> > >> > toe the line to last years budget. A<BR>
> slight increases might be<BR>
> > >> > allowed<BR>
> > >> for<BR>
> > >> > the Sheriffs budget, but not the amount<BR>
> requested. Congratulation to<BR>
> > >> Bill<BR>
> > >> > Thompson for requesting a<BR>
> decrease. The Troy teachers voluntarily<BR>
> > >> took a<BR>
> > >> > decrease. Moscow teachers should have<BR>
> done the same. Genesee recently<BR>
> > >> hired<BR>
> > >> > a new Superintendant for $90,000. I<BR>
> think that this was too much.<BR>
> > >> Again we<BR>
> > >> > are still in an economic slump and<BR>
> everyone should share the burden.<BR>
> > >> > Roger<BR>
> > >> ><BR>
> > >> > -----Original message-----<BR>
> > >> > From: nickgier@roadrunner.com<BR>
> > >> > Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:27:54 -0700<BR>
> > >> > To: vision2020@moscow.com<BR>
> > >> > Subject: [Vision2020] Idaho Faculty<BR>
> Salary Survey<BR>
> > >> ><BR>
> > >> > > Dear Visionaries:<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > Usually the faculty union is able<BR>
> to published faculty salaries<BR>
> > >> > > much<BR>
> > >> > earlier in the year, but we did not get<BR>
> the data until last month.<BR>
> > >> The most<BR>
> > >> > telling contrast is President Nellis'<BR>
> 487 percent increase over 29<BR>
> > >> years vs.<BR>
> > >> > 211 percent increase for UI full<BR>
> professors. (CPI for that period is<BR>
> > >> 218)<BR>
> > >> > For 11 administrative positions the<BR>
> increase was 280 percent.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > Idaho Faculty Salary Survey<BR>
> 2010-11<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > We have published a UI salary<BR>
> survey every year since 1974.<BR>
> > >> Individual<BR>
> > >> > faculty data come from the UI Budget<BR>
> Office. UI Salary data and<BR>
> > >> analyses<BR>
> > >> > going back to 2000-2001 can be found at<BR>
> > >> <www.idaho-aft.org/salaries.htm>.<BR>
> > >> > > UI full professors are 23% behind<BR>
> their peers on Ph.D.-granting<BR>
> > >> campuses,<BR>
> > >> > while UI associate and assistant<BR>
> professors are 14% and 17% behind<BR>
> > >> > re-spectively. Since FY82, when the full<BR>
> professor differential was<BR>
> > >> 17%, UI<BR>
> > >> > fulls have lost 6% to their peers.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > Also at the URL above you can find<BR>
> UI salaries by department and<BR>
> > >> unit; an<BR>
> > >> > all Idaho campus survey with UI<BR>
> administration salaries; a national<BR>
> > >> survey<BR>
> > >> > by discipline; and a UI survey by<BR>
> discipline. The superb Oklahoma<BR>
> > >> State<BR>
> > >> > study by discipline is no longer<BR>
> available to us.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > ISU, BSU, and LCSC Salaries Now<BR>
> Included<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > With aid of the annual salary<BR>
> survey done by the American<BR>
> > >> Association of<BR>
> > >> > University Professors we are now able to<BR>
> add faculty salaries from<BR>
> > >> ISU, BSU,<BR>
> > >> > and LCSC. We urge faculty from these<BR>
> campuses to gather their<BR>
> > >> department and<BR>
> > >> > unit salaries in the same way that the<BR>
> UI union has done for years.<BR>
> > >> > > BSU faculty suffer a much greater<BR>
> differential than their peers:<BR>
> > >> > > 34%<BR>
> > >> for<BR>
> > >> > fulls; 22% for associates; and 20% for<BR>
> assistants. The ISU gap just<BR>
> > >> > as<BR>
> > >> bad:<BR>
> > >> > 33%/23%/22%. For B.A./B.S. institutions<BR>
> LCSC is also way behind:<BR>
> > >> 33%/31%/<BR>
> > >> > 26%.<BR>
> > >> > > Some BSU and ISU faculty have<BR>
> higher teaching loads but the same<BR>
> > >> research<BR>
> > >> > expectations, so they should at least<BR>
> have salary equity with the UI.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > NIC, CSI, CWI Salaries Coming Next<BR>
> Year<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > We will publish Idaho 2-year campus<BR>
> salaries in next yearâ?Ts<BR>
> > >> survey. For<BR>
> > >> > the time being faculty there can compare<BR>
> their salaries with the<BR>
> > >> national<BR>
> > >> > averages for ranked and non-ranked<BR>
> faculty. CSI faculty have rank but<BR>
> > >> no<BR>
> > >> > tenure; NIC faculty have tenure but no<BR>
> rank; CWI faculty have neither<BR>
> > >> rank<BR>
> > >> > nor tenure.<BR>
> > >> > > For many years NIC faculty have<BR>
> enjoyed the ad-vantage of a salary<BR>
> > >> step<BR>
> > >> > system, and after several years of no<BR>
> funding for the steps, the NIC<BR>
> > >> > president and board authorized money for<BR>
> the steps. In good years NIC<BR>
> > >> > faculty receive cost-of-living raises on<BR>
> top of the automatic steps.<BR>
> > >> The<BR>
> > >> > union has always argued that that merit<BR>
> pay should be a separate<BR>
> > >> > appropriation and should be awarded by<BR>
> extra steps.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > UI Administrative Raises up 273%<BR>
> over 29 Years vs. Full Professors<BR>
> > >> at<BR>
> > >> > 211%; CPI is 218<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > In terms of cost of living, UI full<BR>
> professors have suffered a 7%<BR>
> > >> pay cut<BR>
> > >> > over 29 years, while UI administrators<BR>
> have enjoyed a 55% pay raise.<BR>
> > >> (We<BR>
> > >> > wish we had FY82 data for the other<BR>
> ranks, but we were lucky to find<BR>
> > >> these<BR>
> > >> > full professor salaries in an old issue<BR>
> of Faculty Advocate.) ISU,<BR>
> > >> BSU, and<BR>
> > >> > LCSC professors have lost much more<BR>
> compared to the CPI.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > Most fortunate, however, is the<BR>
> fact that we have UI administrative<BR>
> > >> > salaries from FY82. These were years<BR>
> before the corporate model for<BR>
> > >> higher<BR>
> > >> > education had taken its full and<BR>
> disastrous effect. Please note that<BR>
> > >> 29<BR>
> > >> > years ago UI deans made pretty much the<BR>
> same salary, and that the<BR>
> > >> president<BR>
> > >> > earned only $7-14,000 more than his<BR>
> deans.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > Those who justify huge<BR>
> administrative salaries say: "This is what<BR>
> > >> the<BR>
> > >> > market demands, and we are still paying<BR>
> less than peer institutions."<BR>
> > >> If<BR>
> > >> > faculty salaries had been keeping up,<BR>
> this would have been<BR>
> > >> > persuasive.<BR>
> > >> > Former UI President Elizabeth Zinser<BR>
> justified her huge salary<BR>
> > >> increase by<BR>
> > >> > claiming that it â?owould raise all<BR>
> boats.â? But, as the State Board<BR>
> > >> of<BR>
> > >> > Education continues to approve these<BR>
> administrative increases each<BR>
> > >> year,<BR>
> > >> > faculty salaries have fallen further and<BR>
> further behind.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > During the period 1990-1995 raises<BR>
> for UI higher administrators<BR>
> > >> > > rose<BR>
> > >> by<BR>
> > >> > 21.3 percent compared to 16.5 percent<BR>
> for faculty. When the AFT made<BR>
> > >> these<BR>
> > >> > increases an issue in 1995, the next<BR>
> year top administrator pay rose<BR>
> > >> only<BR>
> > >> > 2.33 percent, about 3 percent lower than<BR>
> the faculty.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > UIâ?Ts Duane Nellisâ?T<BR>
> $335,005 is 487% over Richard Gibbâ?Ts 1981<BR>
> > >> Salary;<BR>
> > >> > > From Three Times to Eight Times<BR>
> Entry Level Professors<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > In 1972 entry level professors made<BR>
> about $10,000, and then<BR>
> > >> President<BR>
> > >> > Ernest Hartung made about $30,000. When<BR>
> President Richard Gibb was<BR>
> > >> hired in<BR>
> > >> > 1977, his salary had risen to four times<BR>
> entry level faculty. (In a<BR>
> > >> 1977<BR>
> > >> > interview with the AFT president, Gibb<BR>
> contended that top faculty<BR>
> > >> should<BR>
> > >> > make more than he did.) Faculty<BR>
> complaints became more vocal when<BR>
> > >> Elizabeth<BR>
> > >> > Zinserâ?Ts FY 94 salary was<BR>
> $125,039, five times entry level<BR>
> > >> > salaries.<BR>
> > >> The<BR>
> > >> > differential with entry level faculty<BR>
> has now risen to over eight<BR>
> > >> times.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > Pay Equity at the Presidential<BR>
> Level Why not for Idahoâ?Ts<BR>
> > >> Professors?<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > When the SBOE met Duane Nellis half<BR>
> way on his salary demands, they<BR>
> > >> then<BR>
> > >> > decided that the ISU and BSU executives<BR>
> would receive essentially the<BR>
> > >> same<BR>
> > >> > pay. This action puts the lie to the<BR>
> UIâ?Ts status as Idahoâ?Ts<BR>
> > >> â?oflag ship<BR>
> > >> > institution. Each of our major<BR>
> universities have outstanding faculty<BR>
> > >> and<BR>
> > >> > most of them do cutting-edge research.<BR>
> So why should ISU and BSU<BR>
> > >> salaries<BR>
> > >> > lag more than 10 percent behind the UI?<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > Thank the AFT for Your Promotion<BR>
> Increase<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > For many years the AFT urged the UI<BR>
> administration to increase the<BR>
> > >> > promotion increments in order to<BR>
> alleviate salary compression in the<BR>
> > >> upper<BR>
> > >> > ranks. The increments used to be $1,000<BR>
> for promotion to associate<BR>
> > >> > and<BR>
> > >> > $1,500 to full professor. We take some<BR>
> credit for the fact that UI<BR>
> > >> President<BR>
> > >> > Robert Hoover raised those increments to<BR>
> $5,000 and $6,500<BR>
> > >> respectively. In<BR>
> > >> > the 2000s they were boosted to $6,000<BR>
> and $8,500 at the UI, and we<BR>
> > >> would<BR>
> > >> > like to see the same amounts for BSU,<BR>
> ISU, and LCSC.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > Across the Board Raises before<BR>
> Merit Pay; otherwise Many Faculty<BR>
> > >> Lose Pay<BR>
> > >> > to Inflation<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > The Hoover administration committed<BR>
> itself to "across the board<BR>
> > >> > increases" for "all employees showing at<BR>
> least satisfactory<BR>
> > >> performance."<BR>
> > >> > This promise stands first in a list that<BR>
> includes promotions, merit<BR>
> > >> pay, and<BR>
> > >> > equity adjustments. The AFT position has<BR>
> always been that as a long<BR>
> > >> > as<BR>
> > >> > salaries do not keep up with the cost of<BR>
> living, then merit pay is a<BR>
> > >> moot<BR>
> > >> > point. When legislative raises are<BR>
> applied according to merit, many<BR>
> > >> faculty<BR>
> > >> > end up with pays cuts because of the<BR>
> decline in general buying power.<BR>
> > >> Merit<BR>
> > >> > pay must be funded by a separate<BR>
> appropriation.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > Collective Bargaining is the Only<BR>
> Answer<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > During the late 1960s there was a<BR>
> large expansion of our public<BR>
> > >> higher<BR>
> > >> > education system. This was good for<BR>
> educational opportunity, but bad<BR>
> > >> in the<BR>
> > >> > way that this system developed according<BR>
> to a business model.<BR>
> > >> University<BR>
> > >> > presidents became less like academic<BR>
> leaders and more like CEOs, and<BR>
> > >> their<BR>
> > >> > salaries, as well as those of their<BR>
> management teams, have<BR>
> > >> skyrocketed.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > > A natural response to the<BR>
> industrialization of the uni-versity was<BR>
> > >> the<BR>
> > >> > rise of faculty unions. They now<BR>
> represent a large majority of<BR>
> > >> > faculty<BR>
> > >> in<BR>
> > >> > states where collective bargaining is<BR>
> allowed. (Idaho,<BR>
> > >> > unfortun-ately,<BR>
> > >> is<BR>
> > >> > one of the 19 where it is not<BR>
> permitted.) Over 320,000 faculty on<BR>
> > >> 1,130<BR>
> > >> > campuses are now under union contracts.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> =======================================================<BR>
> > >> > > List services made available<BR>
> by First Step Internet,<BR>
> > >> > > serving the communities of<BR>
> the Palouse since 1994.<BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> <A HREF="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A><BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> <A HREF="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>
> > >> > ><BR>
> =======================================================<BR>
> > >> ><BR>
> > >> ><BR>
> =======================================================<BR>
> > >> > List services made available by<BR>
> First Step Internet,<BR>
> > >> > serving the communities of the<BR>
> Palouse since 1994.<BR>
> > >> ><BR>
> <A HREF="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A><BR>
> > >> ><BR>
> <A HREF="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>
> > >> ><BR>
> =======================================================<BR>
> > >><BR>
> > >><BR>
> > ><BR>
> > ><BR>
> =======================================================<BR>
> > > List services made available by First Step<BR>
> Internet,<BR>
> > > serving the communities of the Palouse<BR>
> since 1994.<BR>
> > ><BR>
> <A HREF="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A><BR>
> > ><BR>
> <A HREF="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>
> > ><BR>
> =======================================================<BR>
> ><BR>
> ><BR>
> > "The Pessimist complains about the wind, the Optimist<BR>
> expects it to change<BR>
> > and the Realist adjusts his sails."<BR>
> ><BR>
> > - Author Unknown<BR>
> ><BR>
><BR>
> =======================================================<BR>
> List services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<BR>
><BR>
> <A HREF="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A><BR>
> <A HREF="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>
> =======================================================<BR>
><BR>
> =======================================================<BR>
> List services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>
> serving the communities of the Palouse since<BR>
> 1994.<BR>
><BR>
> <A HREF="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A><BR>
><BR>
> <A HREF="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>
> =======================================================<BR>
<BR>
=======================================================<BR>
List services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR>
<A HREF="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A> <BR>
<A HREF="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>
=======================================================<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>