<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 06/09/2011 10:49 AM, Art Deco wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:73963A035DBD44DEAEF9E7A1A6A71BC4@LocalHost"
type="cite">
<div><font face="Verdana">So when Johnson and Rumelhart say that
the so-called legal issues are the only considerations, they
exhibit where their real values lie: so-called local legal
issues are far more important that genocide, aiding and
abetting the enemy, and environmental damage. They may be
comfortable with these values. But when they claim they are
"concerned" about the oil sands projects, what a bunch of
hypocritical bullshit. They made be "concerned" but hardly a
whit's worth.</font></div>
<div><font face="Verdana">If people, including Johnson and
Rumelhart, are really concerned, then they can act. Most of
us are limited to acting locally through influencing our
elected representatives and other agencies, not globally.
That's what we are doing. There is a big difference between
Johnson, Rumelhart, and their ilk and Rosa Parks. I hope most
of us are of her image, though none of us will shine nearly,
nearly as brightly.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Verdana">w.</font></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
WTF? I mean, seriously, what the frak? We're talking about permits
for moving large loads across state highways. How is this in any
way comparable to the civil rights movement? If you care so gods
damned much, get off your ass, go to wherever the headquarters of
Imperial Oil is located, and protest the oil sands project. Go save
the world. There are better avenues for doing this than abusing the
IDT permit process.<br>
<br>
I guarantee that you restrain your actions due to legal concerns,
too, else you'd have popped a cap in the ass of whoever is in charge
of the oil sands project by now.<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
</body>
</html>