<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns:fb><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19046">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>
<DIV class=blog_header>
<H1><A href="http://tucsoncitizen.com/usa-today-news">Arizona News from USA
Today</A></H1>
<H2 class=blog_description><A
href="http://tucsoncitizen.com/usa-today-news"></A></H2></DIV>
<DIV id=post-10763 class=post>
<H3>Column: You can’t reconcile Ayn Rand and Jesus</H3><SMALL><FONT size=2>by
</FONT><A title="Posts by Stephen Prothero"
href="http://tucsoncitizen.com/usa-today-news/author/stephen-prothero/"><FONT
size=2>Stephen Prothero</FONT></A><FONT size=2> on Jun. 05, 2011, under
</FONT><A title="View all posts in USA Today News"
href="http://tucsoncitizen.com/usa-today-news/category/usa-today-news/"
rel="category tag"><FONT size=2>USA Today News</FONT></A></SMALL><BR>
<DIV id=fb-root></DIV><fb:like font="" action="recommend" show_faces="true"
width="450" layout="button_count" send="true"
href="http://tucsoncitizen.com/usa-today-news/2011/06/05/column-you-cant-reconcile-ayn-rand-and-jesus/"></fb:like>
<DIV class=entry>
<P>The new darling of the Republican Party is pro-choice and anti-religion. <URL
onclick="window.open('','popup729','width=770,height=483,left=0,top=0,resizable,scrollbars=no')"
href="http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/abortion.html">She once wrote</URL>
that, since “an embryo has no rights,” abortion “should be left to the sole
discretion of the woman involved.” And when asked by <I>Playboy</I> magazine
whether religion “ever offered anything of constructive value to human life” she
answered “no,” adding that “faith, as such, is extremely detrimental to human
life.”</P>
<P>Her name is Ayn Rand, and though she died in 1982 this novelist, philosopher
and anti-communist crusader is the hot new thing in the GOP. The American public
may have met the April opening <I>Atlas Shrugged</I>, a film based on her novel
of the same name, with a collective shrug, but Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh tout
her books, and her genius. And the opening line of “Atlas Shrugged” (“Who is
John Galt?”) pops up regularly on handmade signs at Tea Party rallies.</P>
<P>Among Rand’s adoring acolytes on Capitol Hill is Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin,
who at a Library of Congress symposium held in 2005 on the centenary of the
Rand’s birth called her “the reason I got involved in public service.” Texas
Rep. Ron Paul, who announced his third presidential run last recently, has
invoked Rand in the House on matters as disparate as NASA and the post office.
His son, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, used her novel <I>Anthem</I> in Senate
hearings in April to argue against government regulations to phase out the
incandescent light bulb. </P>
<P>When asked to name his favorite political philosopher, George W. Bush named
Jesus Christ. But Ayn Rand is the GOP’s new savior, and no one seems to be
taking notice of just how opposed their two philosophies are.</P>
<P><B>Individualism vs. collectivism</B></P>
<P>In Rand’s Manichaean world, it is not God vs. Satan, but individualism vs.
collectivism. While Jesus says, “Blessed are the poor,” she sings Hosannas to
the rich. The heroes of <I>Atlas Shrugged</I> (which, alas, is only slightly
shorter than the Bible) are captains of industry such as John Galt. The villains
are the “looters” and “moochers” — people who by hook (guilt) or by crook
(government coercion) steal from the hard-won earnings of others.</P>
<P>Turning the tables on traditional Christian morality, Rand argues that
altruism is immoral and selfishness is good. Moreover, there isn’t a problem in
the world that laissez-faire capitalism can’t solve if left alone to perform its
miracles.</P>
<P>I first read <I>Atlas Shrugged</I> and her other popular novel, <I>The
Fountainhead</I>, while festival-hopping in Spain after graduating from college,
so I can attest to the appeal of this philosophy to late adolescents of a
certain gender. As an adult, however, Rand’s work reads to me like a vulgar
rationalization for greed lying on top of a perverse myth of the right
relationship between individual and community. So when Ryan says that, “Ayn
Rand, more than anyone else, did a fantastic job of explaining the morality of
capitalism, the morality of individualism,” I have to question his use of the
word “explaining.” “Duping” seems like the more appropriate verb.</P>
<P>As someone who has written extensively on the religious illiteracy of the
American public, I am not surprised that few Republicans today seem to
understand that marrying Ayn Rand to Jesus Christ is like trying to interest
Lady Gaga in Donny Osmond. But there is nothing Christian about Rand’s
Objectivism. In fact, it is farther from Christianity than the Marxism that Rand
so abhorred. Despite the attempt of the advertising executive Bruce Barton to
turn Jesus into a CEO in his novel <I>The Man Nobody Knows</I> (1925), Jesus was
a first-class, grade-A “moocher.”</P>
<P>I am somewhat surprised, however, at how few GOP thinkers seem to see how
hostile her philosophy is to conservatism itself. Real conservatism is first and
foremost about conserving a society’s traditions, including its religious and
political traditions. But Rand’s Objectivism rejects in the name of reason
appeals to either revelation or tradition. The individual is her hero, and God
and the dead be damned.</P>
<P>Real conservatism is also about sacrifice, as is authentic Christianity.
President Kennedy was liberal in many ways, but, “Ask not what your country can
do for you — ask what you can do for your country” was classic conservatism.
Rand, however, will brook no such sacrifice. Serve yourself, she tells us, and
save yourself as well. There is no higher good than individual
self-satisfaction.</P>
<P>One of the reasons we are in our current economic quagmire is that none of
our leaders is willing to ask us to sacrifice. Democrats call for more spending
and more taxes; Republicans call for lower taxes and less spending, and what we
get is the most fiscally ruinous half of each: lower taxes and more
spending.</P>
<P><B>A budget of too little Jesus</B></P>
<P>Over the last few weeks, various Christian groups have criticized Republican
leaders for proposing a 2012 budget that in their view is both un-Christian and
anti-life. First, dozens of professors, priests and nuns at various Catholic
universities criticized House Speaker John Boehner for a legislative record on
the poor that was, in their estimation, “among the worst in Congress.” “Mr.
Speaker, your voting record is at variance from one of the Church’s most ancient
moral teachings,” they wrote. “From the apostles to the present, the Magisterium
of the Church has insisted that those in power are morally obliged to preference
the needs of the poor.”</P>
<P>Then a consortium of evangelical and Catholic groups aired an ad scolding
Ryan, who spearheaded that GOP budget, for his own “anti-life” stands. In this
ad, Father Thomas Kelley, a self-described “pro-life” priest from Elkhorn, Wis.,
insisted that “God calls us to protect life at all stages,” not just in the
womb. </P>
<P>In short, these Christians are telling the GOP that there is too much Rand in
their budget, and too little Jesus.</P>
<P>I don’t see either <I>Atlas Shrugged</I> or the Bible as holy writ. I think
the Bible is more wise, better written and, ironically, less likely to come
across as holier than thou, but I have not come either to bury Ayn Rand or to
lament her recent resurrection. My aim is to force a choice.</P>
<P>If you are going to propose a Robin Hood budget, you have to decide whether
you are robbing from the poor to give to the rich, or robbing from the rich to
give to the poor. Because you cannot do both. You cannot worship both the God of
Jesus and the mammon of Rand.</P>
<P>I don’t agree very often with the Watergate criminal and evangelical leader
Chuck Colson, but he has it right when he refers to Rand’s “idolatry of self and
selfishness” as “the antithesis of Christianity”</P>
<P>Rand’s trinity is “I me mine.” Christianity’s is the Father, the Son, and the
Holy Spirit. So take your pick. Or say no to both. It’s a free country. Just
don’t tell me you are both a card-carrying Objectivist and a Bible-believing
Christian. Even Rand knew that just wasn’t possible.</P>
<P><I>Stephen Prothero is a religion professor at Boston University and the
author of the book</I> God is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the
World — and Why Their Differences Matter.</P></DIV></DIV></FONT></DIV><FONT
size=2>
<DIV>_________________________________________<BR>Wayne A. Fox<BR>1009 Karen
Lane<BR>PO Box 9421<BR>Moscow, ID 83843</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><A href="mailto:waf@moscow.com">waf@moscow.com</A><BR>208
882-7975<BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>