No Roger, Glenn did not answer the question. Glenn made several fallacious points, some of which were pointed out and all of which are ignored below. And do you also support slavery, another view that "Glenn" supports?<br>
<br>Why bother pretending to engage in discussions about these issues if you IGNORE criticisms of points made? Here is another refutation of one of your points. Please respond.<br><br>You write that NPR is "[s]lightly left of center" [even though you admit to listening to it only "occasionally" and do not provide ONE example supporting this claim]. If this is a reason to not fund NPR via taxpayer money, then the following would also be a good argument: The military is slightly right of center, so it should not receive any public funding.<br>
<br>So which is it: should we end public support for the military or should we recognize that your argument is a bad one?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:54 AM, lfalen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lfalen@turbonet.com">lfalen@turbonet.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">I have not been on the computer all week, but I think that Glenn answered your question.<br>
In response ro Nick- I do not know it Nader is right or not.I have only listened to NPR occasionally. What I have caught is Fresh Air or All Things Considered. They both at the times I heard them seemed to be lightly left of center. Nader only mentioned Charlie Rose. I am sure there a lot of other hosts besides Rose. I have never heard him. In any event this is all irrelevant. It would not make any difference if they were equally balanced or were 100% to the right. They should not be geting any funding from the taxpayers. In case you don't realize it we are in a money crunch. Let spend only on those thing that are essential and can not be done adequately by the private sector. I want to see our veterans taken care of for just one of many that we should be spending on. Your ideal Nation of Sweden is geting the message and cutting back on services before they wind up like Greece and Ireland. I hope they succeed, that is the ancestral home of the Falen's. They come from Ostergotlund.<br>
You may know where that is.<br>
Roger<br>
-----Original message-----<br>
From: Joe Campbell <a href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com">philosopher.joe@gmail.com</a><br>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:27:38 -0700<br>
To: lfalen <a href="mailto:lfalen@turbonet.com">lfalen@turbonet.com</a><br>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] No government support for NPR et al?<br>
<br>
> State one left wing point of view that NPR broadcasts, Roger. Just one.<br>
><br>
> They broadcast news. You are so used to listening to the lies on Fox that<br>
> you confuse them for "points of view."<br>
><br>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:17 AM, lfalen <<a href="mailto:lfalen@turbonet.com">lfalen@turbonet.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > If NPR wants to broadcast left wing points of view and supporters are<br>
> > willing to fund it, more power to them.<br>
> > Roger<br>
> > -----Original message-----<br>
> > From: "Robert Dickow" <a href="mailto:dickow@turbonet.com">dickow@turbonet.com</a><br>
> > Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 02:18:10 -0700<br>
> > To: <a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
> > Subject: [Vision2020] No government support for NPR et al?<br>
> ><br>
> > > I hear that the conservative congressmen have proposed withdrawing<br>
> > > government funding for NPR. Apparently a newscaster or fund drive person<br>
> > or<br>
> > > somebody made some disparaging remarks about the Tea Party. Fie! Fie!<br>
> > Now,<br>
> > > denying public broadcasting all those scarce taxpayer dollars sounds like<br>
> > a<br>
> > > reasonable and just response to such offenses if you're a conservative<br>
> > > Republican sympathetic with the Tea Party movement, right? Uh huh.sure.<br>
> > How<br>
> > > dumb can anybody be?! NPR won't suddenly go belly up and go off the air,<br>
> > > slinking off into the shadows with its tail between its legs. Private<br>
> > > donors-- those dwindling middle class stalwarts-- will valiantly step up<br>
> > to<br>
> > > the plate in ever greater numbers. So what will actually happen, then, is<br>
> > > that NPR will be unfettered and free to unleash all their rabid commie<br>
> > pinko<br>
> > > liberal gun-hating womens libber staffers to say all the rabid commie<br>
> > pinko<br>
> > > tea-barfing they've always wanted to say but didn't because they felt<br>
> > > compelled to be balanced in their commie pinko tree-hugging opinions and<br>
> > > bleeding-heart liberal union thug biased news reporting. Clearly, this<br>
> > > government measure will not serve the common good. And I may be forced to<br>
> > > mix even more metaphors in the future.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Bob Dickow, troublemaker<br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> ><br>
> > =======================================================<br>
> > List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>
> > <a href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.net</a><br>
> > mailto:<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
> > =======================================================<br>
> ><br>
><br>
><br>
</blockquote></div><br>