<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=utf-8>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.17093" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY id=MailContainerBody
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
bgColor=#ffffff leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>"dysfunctional disclarity"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Dave Barry thinks that this would be a good name
for a neo-punk band.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I, on the other hand think it would be good if
you gave it a rest.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>g</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=deco@moscow.com href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:17
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] [SPAM]Re: that
Jared guy and mental health</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>The thesis is that you are not interested in
constructive dialog.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>Your response gives more than ample evidence of
that. And also more than ample evidence of dysfunctional
disclarity.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>w.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=jampot@roadrunner.com href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">Gary
Crabtree</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=deco@moscow.com
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> ; <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, February 02, 2011 7:57
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] [SPAM]Re:
that Jared guy and mental health</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2>"Either
define "left" and "right" or enumerate those on the list that you consider
to be "right" and "left" so that people will not have to attempt to
reach the foggy recesses of your mind in order to decide who's who in your
opinion. </FONT><FONT size=2>Otherwise, most will think you are
pulling a Roger Falen by refusing to respond to an issue in any meaningful
terms except by repeating yourself using different words and
syntax."</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>While I find you mildly unpleasant and not a little
creepy, I don't currently believe you are stupid. Do you really still
imagine that insisting that I respond to to your demands in
precisely the manner that will please you is a productive use of your
time? Do you actually believe that I am concerned with what you and your
mythical "most" are thinking? If so, a drastic revision of my opinion is in
order.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#0000ff size=2>"I think that you are
cravenly refusing to define or enumerate "right" and "left" because even in
that dark back room of The Lock Shop you know that there is vast
disagreement among those you claim to be on the left on this list on some
very fundamental issues such as abortion, the death penalty, health care,
first amendment rights, gun ownership rights, religious freedom and truth,
the bailouts and other economic issues, educational reform, drug policy,
the desirability of unions, possible solutions to the immigration
problems, etc. " </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Oh no! Us cartoon characters in our dark back rooms prefer to believe
in monolithic stereotypes that never vary from the role to which they are
assigned. To wit:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The "right" = six gun toting, God fearing, courageous,
generous types who love America, Mom, and apple pie and feel truly
sorry for drug ingesting hippies who refuse to eat red meat and have
questionable hygiene. These stalwarts gravitate to professions such as
astronaut, super hero/costumed crime fighter, bronco busting, bull
riding cowboy of a decidedly non-brokeback persuasion, and double ought
spy.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The "left" = squirrelly, tofu munching, dope smoking, atheist gas
bags who march and wave placards in homogenous herds and have never met a
criminal, tree, or illegal alien that they have not immediately wanted
to coddle, hug, or provide welfare benefits to. If they can be bothered
to arise from their cannabis and/or narcotic induced stupor to perform
any semi-useful labor at all they will normally be lawyers, collage
professors (liberal arts), bureaucrats, interpretive dancers, and
mimes</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Does that satisfy your curious lust for definition?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#0000ff>Something, something,
something...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#0000ff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>Some hastily tossed off flippant response. Is it becoming obvious that
boredom is </DIV>
<DIV>beginning to set in? Gosh, I hope not.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#0000ff>Blah, blah, reading
suggestions I'll immediately ignore, blah...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#0000ff></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>zzzzz...</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#0000ff size=2>"It's time to man up
and either respond to the issues in a way that would promote
understanding/clarification and possible resolutions, or man up and admit
that you are just another propagandist whose goal is not truth, but attempts
at persuasion exalting your personal ideals."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Or what? you'll hold your breath, kick your little feets and pound your
teeny widdle fists? Listen, I get it. I really do. You want me to take this
forum more seriously. You want me to take you seriously. You want me to read
the books you recommend. You want me to discuss what you want to discuss and
you want me to discuss it in a manner that is pleasing to you. I'm reading
you five by five. It pains me to have to tell you that there no chance your
dreams are going to come true in this regard. For the last time, here's the
deal. You may feel free to complain to your little hearts content but,
I write what I write for reasons that are my own. Demanding that I do
something differently or insisting that I respond to you in some specific
way is a waste of your precious remaining time on earth. Now go pound
sand.</DIV>
<DIV> <FONT face=Calibri color=#000000 size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV>g</DIV></DIV></DIV></FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=deco@moscow.com
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, February 02, 2011 8:30 AM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A
title="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] [SPAM]Re: that Jared guy and mental
health</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>Crabtree writes:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>'I don't really believe that there is any
real lack of clarity on this list as to where the "left" leaves off and the
"right" kicks in."'</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Either define "left" and "right" or enumerate those on the
list that you consider to be "right" and "left" so that people will not
have to attempt to reach the foggy recesses of your mind in order to decide
who's who in your opinion. </FONT><FONT size=2>Otherwise, most will
think you are pulling a Roger Falen by refusing to respond to an issue in
any meaningful terms except by repeating yourself using different words and
syntax. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I think that you are cravenly refusing to define or
enumerate "right" and "left" because even in that dark back room of The Lock
Shop you know that there is vast disagreement among those you claim to be on
the left on this list on some very fundamental issues such as abortion, the
death penalty, health care, first amendment rights, gun ownership rights,
religious freedom and truth, the bailouts and other economic issues,
educational reform, drug policy, the desirability of unions, possible
solutions to the immigration problems, etc. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>And hence, any meaningful characterization of "left" and
right" would exclude or make very fuzzy their inclusion in the list many you
apparently think of as leftists. That this is so is exhibited by many
prior discussions on this list. So, to deny such is either
dishonest and/or cowardly. [Google: "Over-simplification",
"Over-generalization", and Dishonesty".]</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>'Also, the definition of "hate speech" is
absolutely clear. It's pretty much anything the left doesn't want to hear
from the right. Hate speech is defined by its source not its
content.'</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>So if someone on the right says "the economy will do
better under conservative leadership," and someone you allege is on the
left disagrees, that's hate speech? What rot. Again you
offer no reasonable criteria to determine what hate speech is except that it
is <STRONG>anything</STRONG> one <STRONG>particular</STRONG> [the "left"]
group doesn't like about what another [the "right"] says. That makes
almost any political discussion of opposing views hate speech.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>See: The Fallacy of Persuasive Definition: <A
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persuasive_definition">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persuasive_definition</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>It is not surprising that you again refuse to participate
in a meaningful discussion of the issues. That is your style and fits
your limited worldview from the window of the backroom of your
business. Your definition of "hate speech" is so prejudicial,
and it's lack of clarity greatly amplified given the lack of
precision of the meaning of "right" and "left" that it tells readers a
lot about you, but not much about the reality outside of you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>"The never-ending insistence that
<STRONG><FONT size=4>everything evil</FONT></STRONG> emanates from the
conservative end of the spectrum and that the libs are long suffering saints
is hogwash and an endless round of competing lists will do nothing to change
that fact."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Another gross distortion/lie/exaggeration. Who one
the list said anything like that? Some have said that violent
rhetoric and hate speech is more common from pundits on the right, but I do
not see that anyone claimed that such practices where exclusive to the
right. So starting with a grossly false O'Reillyism, you then negate
the possibility of anyone giving any kind of evidence that would might
clarify or give weight to one side or the other on the issue. What a
dunce-like position!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Although you falsely accused Reggie of being foolish
because you disagreed with his characterization of three people on his prior
long list, and although your alleged counterexamples are open to reasonable
questions such as Andreas Schou has raised, it is you that appears to
be foolish, if not dishonest and cowardly when you:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>[1] Refuse to define in any meaningful way what you are
talking about, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>[2] Use really cockeyed, prejudicial persuasive
definitions when you do deign to define terms, and </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>[3] Tell bald-faced lies about other's
positions.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Perhaps your self-education might benefit from a
concentrated study of Wesley Salmon's concise, but incisive book
<EM>Logic</EM>. Or a careful reading of <EM>Proofiness</EM> by Charles
Seife might help you deal with some of your problems of
over-generalization and over-simplification.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>It's time to man up and either respond to the issues in a
way that would promote understanding/clarification and possible resolutions,
or man up and admit that you are just another propagandist whose goal is not
truth, but attempts at persuasion exalting your personal
ideals.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>w.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=jampot@roadrunner.com href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">Gary
Crabtree</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=deco@moscow.com
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> ; <A
title=vision2020@moscow.com href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision
2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, February 01, 2011 7:48
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [SPAM]Re: [Vision2020]
that Jared guy and mental health</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Interesting. You sound like the
kid on the playground who always wanted to tell everyone else what the
game should be, define the minutia the games rules, and then
become pouty when his expectations weren't met with regard to being
deferred to in all matters. Life can be a disappointment for kids like
that.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT><FONT
color=#000000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>I don't really believe that
there is any real lack of clarity on this list as to where the "left"
leaves off and the "right" kicks in. (I don't consider myself a
proper member of the "right" but to make this easier for you we'll
pretend it's the case) The difficulty arises, at the very least in the
most current discussion, when those on the left want to pretend to be
Sunday's child where it comes to acts of violence and political discussion
that is less then demure. The never-ending insistence that everything evil
emanates from the conservative end of the spectrum and that the libs are
long suffering saints is hogwash and an endless round of competing lists
will do nothing to change that fact.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Also, the definition of "hate
speech" is absolutely clear. It's pretty much anything the left doesn't
want to hear from the right. Hate speech is defined by its source not its
content. When the same sentiments are expressed from a liberal perspective
it becomes passionate political discourse and a sacred first amendment
principal. From the right, pure incitement to violence (even when none was
voiced) to be quashed by any and every means possible. Violent speech
is funny in that when a person hailing from the "right" talks of targeting
a district, defeating an opponent, or quotes the founding fathers the
remarks are an unequivocal, bold neon colored calls for assassination.
When the "left" explicitly hope for the death of Sarah
Palin and/or her children, pray for Dick Cheney's heart to give out,
and make big budget Hollywood movies glorifying the murder of GWB, the
speech is apparently translucent in the lack of notice it
receives.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>I hope that this gives you "a
clear and distinct idea" on where this cartoon character stands on the
matter at hand. Now, if you'd be so kind, could you go into a little more
detail with regard to my education? There is very little that I find more
fascinating then to hear the playground mope expound at length on the
topic of what he imagines my background to be.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>g</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri color=#000000 size=3></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
title="mailto:deco@moscow.com CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, February 01, 2011 2:35 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A
title="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> [SPAM]Re: [Vision2020] that Jared guy and mental
health</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri color=#000000></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>A lesson to Reggie, et al:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>This dispute is on Vision 2020 is driven by
at least two things:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>1. The lack of anywhere
near agreement on the definitions of "right" v. "left" and "hate
speech".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>2. The apparent inability
and unwillingness of Falen/Crabtree to support their positions with
meaningful arguments. With Roger, it is the apparent inability to
understand what an argument is; with Crabtree, it is the long demonstrated
unwillingness <STRONG>to engage in meaningful dialogue</STRONG> on any
subject where his basic beliefs may be threatened by facts and/or
alternative values.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>Reggie: When you put the list at
issue together, you offered evidence. One would expect those holding
an opposing views would offer a different list of at least the same
magnitude. Both Crabtree and Falen are unwilling to do so.
Forget meaningful dialogue.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>At some point, maybe one side or the other
would offer more clarifying definitions so that the dispute could be
better conducted by referring meaningful evidence. Don't look to
Falen or Crabtree for that either. It is too
threatening.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>I repeat the following without much hope
that either Falen or Crabtree will alter their self-satisfying, but
futile, churlish behavior:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT color=#0000ff>'It may be wise to remember in a
discussion of values</FONT> [or any other subject] <FONT color=#0000ff>the
following paraphrase of a quotation from English Philosopher John
Locke:</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>"When comparing two ideas, it is necessary
to have a clear and distinct idea of each."'</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Or its modern statement:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>"When comparing two statements or theories, the clearer,
less vague and ambiguous statement(s) of and definitions used in each, the
better the chance of meaningfully determining the truth, or in the case of
values, the correct application, or least discovering the roots of
agreement or disagreement."</FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>Over many months of reading Crabtree
in action on V2020 I have thought that he might be the object of a
possible <EM>Far Side</EM> cartoon whose caption would be "When
self-education goes horribly wrong."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV><FONT face=Verdana
size=2>
<DIV><BR>Wayne A. Fox<BR>1009 Karen Lane<BR>PO Box 9421<BR>Moscow,
ID 83843</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><A href="mailto:waf@moscow.com">waf@moscow.com</A><BR>208
882-7975<BR></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=lfalen@turbonet.com
href="mailto:lfalen@turbonet.com">lfalen</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=reggieholmquist@u.boisestate.edu
href="mailto:reggieholmquist@u.boisestate.edu">Reggie Holmquist</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, February 01, 2011
10:52 AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] that
Jared guy and mental health</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>I hope that you had fun putting together this list, some
of which it would really be a stretch to call hate speech or necessarily
from the the right. It would almost seem that anything you disagree with
is hate speech or right wing. I don't much care if it is exactly equal
from both sides. suffice it to say that there is plenty on both.
<STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>I am not going to go tit for tat with
you.<BR></FONT></STRONG>Roger<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>=======================================================<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>=======================================================<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================
<P>
<HR>
<P></P><BR>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com <BR>Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3419 - Release
Date: 02/02/11 11:34:00<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>