<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=utf-8 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18999">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
id=MailContainerBody leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 bgColor=#ffffff
name="Compose message area" CanvasTabStop="true">
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>Crabtree writes:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>'I don't really believe that there is any real
lack of clarity on this list as to where the "left" leaves off and the "right"
kicks in."'</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Either define "left" and "right" or enumerate those on the
list that you consider to be "right" and "left" so that people will not
have to attempt to reach the foggy recesses of your mind in order to decide
who's who in your opinion. </FONT><FONT size=2>Otherwise, most will think
you are pulling a Roger Falen by refusing to respond to an issue in any
meaningful terms except by repeating yourself using different words and
syntax. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I think that you are cravenly refusing to define or enumerate
"right" and "left" because even in that dark back room of The Lock Shop you know
that there is vast disagreement among those you claim to be on the left on this
list on some very fundamental issues such as abortion, the death penalty, health
care, first amendment rights, gun ownership rights, religious freedom and truth,
the bailouts and other economic issues, educational reform, drug policy,
the desirability of unions, possible solutions to the immigration problems,
etc. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>And hence, any meaningful characterization of "left" and
right" would exclude or make very fuzzy their inclusion in the list many you
apparently think of as leftists. That this is so is exhibited by many
prior discussions on this list. So, to deny such is either dishonest
and/or cowardly. [Google: "Over-simplification",
"Over-generalization", and Dishonesty".]</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>'Also, the definition of "hate speech" is
absolutely clear. It's pretty much anything the left doesn't want to hear from
the right. Hate speech is defined by its source not its content.'</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>So if someone on the right says "the economy will do better
under conservative leadership," and someone you allege is on the left
disagrees, that's hate speech? What rot. Again you offer no
reasonable criteria to determine what hate speech is except that it is
<STRONG>anything</STRONG> one <STRONG>particular</STRONG> [the "left"] group
doesn't like about what another [the "right"] says. That makes almost any
political discussion of opposing views hate speech.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>See: The Fallacy of Persuasive Definition: <A
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persuasive_definition">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persuasive_definition</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>It is not surprising that you again refuse to participate in a
meaningful discussion of the issues. That is your style and fits your
limited worldview from the window of the backroom of your business. Your
definition of "hate speech" is so prejudicial, and it's lack of clarity
greatly amplified given the lack of precision of the meaning of "right" and
"left" that it tells readers a lot about you, but not much about the
reality outside of you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>"The never-ending insistence that <STRONG><FONT
size=4>everything evil</FONT></STRONG> emanates from the conservative end of the
spectrum and that the libs are long suffering saints is hogwash and an endless
round of competing lists will do nothing to change that fact."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Another gross distortion/lie/exaggeration. Who one the
list said anything like that? Some have said that violent rhetoric
and hate speech is more common from pundits on the right, but I do not see that
anyone claimed that such practices where exclusive to the right. So
starting with a grossly false O'Reillyism, you then negate the possibility of
anyone giving any kind of evidence that would might clarify or give weight to
one side or the other on the issue. What a dunce-like
position!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Although you falsely accused Reggie of being foolish because
you disagreed with his characterization of three people on his prior long list,
and although your alleged counterexamples are open to reasonable questions
such as Andreas Schou has raised, it is you that appears to
be foolish, if not dishonest and cowardly when you:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>[1] Refuse to define in any meaningful way what you are
talking about, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>[2] Use really cockeyed, prejudicial persuasive definitions
when you do deign to define terms, and </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>[3] Tell bald-faced lies about other's positions.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Perhaps your self-education might benefit from a concentrated
study of Wesley Salmon's concise, but incisive book <EM>Logic</EM>.
Or a careful reading of <EM>Proofiness</EM> by Charles Seife might help you deal
with some of your problems of over-generalization and
over-simplification.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>It's time to man up and either respond to the issues in a way
that would promote understanding/clarification and possible resolutions, or man
up and admit that you are just another propagandist whose goal is not truth, but
attempts at persuasion exalting your personal ideals.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>w.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=jampot@roadrunner.com href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">Gary
Crabtree</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=deco@moscow.com
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> ; <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, February 01, 2011 7:48
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [SPAM]Re: [Vision2020] that
Jared guy and mental health</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>Interesting. You sound like the kid
on the playground who always wanted to tell everyone else what the game should
be, define the minutia the games rules, and then become pouty when
his expectations weren't met with regard to being deferred to in all matters.
Life can be a disappointment for kids like that.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT><FONT color=#000000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>I don't really believe that there
is any real lack of clarity on this list as to where the "left" leaves off and
the "right" kicks in. (I don't consider myself a proper member of the
"right" but to make this easier for you we'll pretend it's the case) The
difficulty arises, at the very least in the most current discussion, when
those on the left want to pretend to be Sunday's child where it comes to acts
of violence and political discussion that is less then demure. The
never-ending insistence that everything evil emanates from the conservative
end of the spectrum and that the libs are long suffering saints is hogwash and
an endless round of competing lists will do nothing to change that
fact.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>Also, the definition of "hate
speech" is absolutely clear. It's pretty much anything the left doesn't want
to hear from the right. Hate speech is defined by its source not its content.
When the same sentiments are expressed from a liberal perspective it becomes
passionate political discourse and a sacred first amendment principal. From
the right, pure incitement to violence (even when none was voiced) to be
quashed by any and every means possible. Violent speech is funny in that
when a person hailing from the "right" talks of targeting a district,
defeating an opponent, or quotes the founding fathers the remarks are an
unequivocal, bold neon colored calls for assassination. When the "left"
explicitly hope for the death of Sarah Palin and/or her
children, pray for Dick Cheney's heart to give out, and make big budget
Hollywood movies glorifying the murder of GWB, the speech is apparently
translucent in the lack of notice it receives.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>I hope that this gives you "a clear
and distinct idea" on where this cartoon character stands on the matter at
hand. Now, if you'd be so kind, could you go into a little more detail with
regard to my education? There is very little that I find more fascinating then
to hear the playground mope expound at length on the topic of what he imagines
my background to be.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>g</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=3 face=Calibri></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
title="mailto:deco@moscow.com CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, February 01, 2011 2:35 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A
title="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> [SPAM]Re: [Vision2020] that Jared guy and mental
health</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>A lesson to Reggie, et al:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>This dispute is on Vision 2020 is driven by at
least two things:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>1. The lack of anywhere near
agreement on the definitions of "right" v. "left" and "hate
speech".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>2. The apparent inability and
unwillingness of Falen/Crabtree to support their positions with
meaningful arguments. With Roger, it is the apparent inability to
understand what an argument is; with Crabtree, it is the long demonstrated
unwillingness <STRONG>to engage in meaningful dialogue</STRONG> on any subject
where his basic beliefs may be threatened by facts and/or alternative
values.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>Reggie: When you put the list at issue
together, you offered evidence. One would expect those holding an
opposing views would offer a different list of at least the same
magnitude. Both Crabtree and Falen are unwilling to do so. Forget
meaningful dialogue.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>At some point, maybe one side or the other
would offer more clarifying definitions so that the dispute could be better
conducted by referring meaningful evidence. Don't look to Falen or
Crabtree for that either. It is too threatening.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>I repeat the following without much hope that
either Falen or Crabtree will alter their self-satisfying, but futile,
churlish behavior:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT color=#0000ff>'It may be wise to remember in a
discussion of values</FONT> [or any other subject] <FONT color=#0000ff>the
following paraphrase of a quotation from English Philosopher John
Locke:</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>"When comparing two ideas, it is necessary to
have a clear and distinct idea of each."'</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Or its modern statement:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>"When comparing two statements or theories, the clearer,
less vague and ambiguous statement(s) of and definitions used in each, the
better the chance of meaningfully determining the truth, or in the case of
values, the correct application, or least discovering the roots of agreement
or disagreement."</FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>Over many months of reading Crabtree in
action on V2020 I have thought that he might be the object of a
possible <EM>Far Side</EM> cartoon whose caption would be "When
self-education goes horribly wrong."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV><FONT size=2 face=Verdana>
<DIV><BR>Wayne A. Fox<BR>1009 Karen Lane<BR>PO Box 9421<BR>Moscow, ID
83843</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><A href="mailto:waf@moscow.com">waf@moscow.com</A><BR>208
882-7975<BR></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=lfalen@turbonet.com href="mailto:lfalen@turbonet.com">lfalen</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=reggieholmquist@u.boisestate.edu
href="mailto:reggieholmquist@u.boisestate.edu">Reggie Holmquist</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:52
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] that Jared
guy and mental health</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>I hope that you had fun putting together this list, some of
which it would really be a stretch to call hate speech or necessarily from
the the right. It would almost seem that anything you disagree with is hate
speech or right wing. I don't much care if it is exactly equal from both
sides. suffice it to say that there is plenty on both. <STRONG><FONT
color=#ff0000>I am not going to go tit for tat with
you.<BR></FONT></STRONG>Roger<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>