<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=utf-8 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.7600.16700"></HEAD>
<BODY style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
id=MailContainerBody leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 bgColor=#ffffff
CanvasTabStop="true" name="Compose message area">
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri><FONT color=#ff0000
face="Times New Roman">"I'll just add that the freedom with which you allow
Republicans -- violent rhetoric is natural in political discourse (when it comes
from NSA, Palin) combined with their uber sensitivity -- criticisms of Palin are
out of bounds -- is pretty laughable."</FONT>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I don't believe that anyone said criticism of Ms. Palin was out of bounds.
I simply feel free to speak up when I hear mischaracterizations and outright
poppycock.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ff0000 face="Times New Roman">"And it's hard to know what to
do here. I could follow your posts with mere denials, misconstruals, and demands
of proofs already given (and ignored), too. Well I could if I lacked standards
of conduct for discourse!"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ff0000 face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>Looking back along the length of this thread I see not a single quote,
citation, or link. I guess it must be time for you to fall back
on the most tried and true weapon in your debate arsenal, refer to me
as a jackass and flounce off in a huff. I never get tired of that one!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ff0000 face="Times New Roman">"Pick just one claim out of the
handful and lets stick with it if you think/claim I'm wrong. Just
one."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I responded to the post in question line by line. The ball is in your
court, Sluggo.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>g<BR><BR></DIV></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=philosopher.joe@gmail.com
href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com">Joe Campbell</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, January 13, 2011 5:30 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A
title="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com">the lockshop</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Cc:</B> <A
title="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">Gary Crabtree</A> ; <A
title="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com> CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com>"><vision2020@moscow.com></A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] A Resolution for the 112th Congress (after
the Tucson Tragedy)</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>I'll just add that the freedom with which you allow Republicans -- violent
rhetoric is natural in political discourse (when it comes from NSA, Palin)
combined with their uber sensitivity -- criticisms of Palin are out of bounds --
is pretty laughable.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>And it's hard to know what to do here. I could follow your posts with mere
denials, misconstruals, and demands of proofs already given (and ignored), too.
Well I could if I lacked standards of conduct for discourse!</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Pick just one claim out of the handful and lets stick with it if you
think/claim I'm wrong. Just one.<BR><BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR>On Jan 13, 2011, at 3:44 PM, "the lockshop" <<A
href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com">lockshop@pull.twcbc.com</A>>
wrote:<BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">"Beck refers to all liberals as
communists.'</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>That is simply not true. At the Media Matters site where they attempt to
promote that notion, the clip they us to try and back up the absurd claim
contains no such remark. Prove me wrong with a cite.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">"Roger makes connections between liberals
and communists regularly."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>These connections exist as you yourself recently admitted.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">"Young had several similar posts on his
Facebook page when he ran for state senate."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>Young did not claim that all liberals are nazis or anything else. (unless
it's misguided in which case I tend to agree) Once again you are making things
up.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">"And you criticize all my posts. You make it
seem like there is something special here but your claims are always the
same."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Actaully I am critical of some of your posts. Life is just to
short to engage you every time you make a remark with which I find foolish.
This is connected to someone calling all liberals nazis in what
way?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">"Do liberals contribute to the negative
climate? Of course."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Glad to hear you finally agree. Progress is being made.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman">"A poster picking out a target who was
actually shot is something different."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>If you have no proof of any sort that the shooter layed
eyes on it, and it's a commonly accepted practice on both sides of
the political divide, what other than happenstance makes it so
different?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>g</DIV></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=philosopher.joe@gmail.com
href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com">Joe Campbell</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=lockshop@pull.twcbc.com
href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com">the lockshop</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=jampot@roadrunner.com
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">Gary Crabtree</A> ; <A
title=vision2020@moscow.com href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com>"><<A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A>></A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:51
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] A Resolution
for the 112th Congress (after the Tucson Tragedy)</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Beck refers to all liberals as communists. </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Roger makes connections between liberals and communists
regularly. </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Young had several similar posts on his Facebook page when he ran for
state senate.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>And you criticize all my posts. You make it seem like there is
something special here but your claims are always the same.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Do liberals contribute to the negative climate? Of course. It is silly
to think that just because I don't say it I don't think it.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>A poster picking out a target who was actually shot is something
different.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR>On Jan 13, 2011, at 11:56 AM, "the lockshop" <<A
href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com"><A
href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com">lockshop@pull.twcbc.com</A></A>>
wrote:<BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>As non sequiturs go, a little more out
of left field then usual but what the heck, I'll play along. Who on the
right regularly refers to ALL liberals as nazis and what does it have to
do with using unfortunate current events to tar those with whom you
disagree?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>g</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=philosopher.joe@gmail.com
href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com">Joe Campbell</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=jampot@roadrunner.com
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">Gary Crabtree</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A
title=lockshop@pull.twcbc.com href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com">the
lockshop</A> ; <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com>"><</A><A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"><A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A></A>>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, January 13, 2011
9:51 AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] A
Resolution for the 112th Congress (after the Tucson Tragedy)</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>There just are no examples of candidates or media figures who
regularly refer to ALL conservatives as Nazis. There are plenty of
analogous examples from the right.<BR><BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR>On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:04 AM, "Gary Crabtree" <<A
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com"></A><A
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com"><A
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">jampot@roadrunner.com</A></A>>
wrote:<BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri>I would have a sliver of respect
for your point if you included so much as a <BR>single example of
rhetoric that was not from the the right. To endlessly<BR>drone
that</FONT> "it's just as extreme to say that the volatile political
<BR>rhetoric of the radical right and the climate it created, and the
Palin poster <BR>in particular, had nothing to do with the shooting."
<FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri>and never once include<BR>one of
the multitude of examples that are just as prevalent on the
left.<BR>You are clearly trying to paint the maniac as, at least
partially, a product <BR>of the right and I'm having none of it so
stop. Really, just stop.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri>g</FONT></DIV><FONT
color=#000000 face=Calibri></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000
face=Calibri><BR><BR></FONT>--------------------------------------------------<BR>From:
"Joe Campbell" <<A href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com"></A><A
href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com"><A
href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com">philosopher.joe@gmail.com</A></A>><BR>Sent:
Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:56 PM<BR>To: "Gary Crabtree" <<A
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com"></A><A
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com"><A
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">jampot@roadrunner.com</A></A>><BR>Cc:
"the lockshop" <<A href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com"></A><A
href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com"><A
href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com">lockshop@pull.twcbc.com</A></A>>;
<<A href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"></A><A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"><A
title="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A></A>><BR>Subject:
Re: [Vision2020] A Resolution for the 112th Congress (after the Tucson
Tragedy)<BR><BR>> What exactly is the moon beam claim? That a
"nothing" claim is<BR>> extreme? And please stop with the "wishful
thinking" claim, which is<BR>> just repeating the insulting comment
that Tom posted from Rush, that<BR>> Democrats wanted this to
happen. Have you no decency? Really just<BR>> stop.<BR>>
<BR>> I'll repeat what I said, again, so it doesn't get lost in
your<BR>> continued attempts to distort my words: It is extreme to
say Palin did<BR>> it and just as extreme to say that the climate
created by the rhetoric<BR>> of the radical right had nothing to do
with the shooting. The truth<BR>> lies somewhere in between. Where?
I don't know. I don't need evidence<BR>> that he saw the map to
support this claim, just to support the extreme<BR>> position you
keep trying to put in my mouth (which I do not hold).<BR>> <BR>>
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Gary Crabtree <<A
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com"></A><A
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com"><A
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">jampot@roadrunner.com</A></A>>
wrote:<BR>>> " I think it is just as extreme to say that the
volatile political rhetoric<BR>>> of the<BR>>> radical
right and the climate it created, and the Palin poster in<BR>>>
particular,<BR>>> had nothing to do with the shooting.
"<BR>>><BR>>> I might be willing to accept this if there
was even a shred of evidence<BR>>> that the psychopath had seen
the map or paid any attention to right<BR>>> wing commentary. So
far, the indications are that he didn't and your<BR>>> claims
appear to be made up of moon beams, fairy dust, and a
heaping<BR>>> shovel full of wishful
thinking<BR>>><BR>>>
g<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>
--------------------------------------------------<BR>>> From:
"Joe Campbell" <<A href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com"></A><A
href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com"><A
href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com">philosopher.joe@gmail.com</A></A>><BR>>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:28 PM<BR>>> To: "the
lockshop" <<A href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com"></A><A
href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com"><A
href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com">lockshop@pull.twcbc.com</A></A>><BR>>>
Cc: <<A href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"></A><A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"><A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A></A>><BR>>>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] A Resolution for the 112th Congress (after
the<BR>>> Tucson Tragedy)<BR>>><BR>>>> What is
the uber left? What policies do they hold? What are
they<BR>>>> saying about Palin that is so egregious? Be
specific. Use quotes.<BR>>>><BR>>>> I know that I've
made some claims about Palin and the shooter, but<BR>>>> most
of my claims were distorted by you and by Roger. I never
blamed<BR>>>> Palin, for instance. I certainly never claimed
that she was<BR>>>> responsible in any way. It would be an
extreme claim to say that she<BR>>>> was an accessory, which
I don't believe and never said. But I think it<BR>>>> is just
as extreme to say that the volatile political rhetoric of
the<BR>>>> radical right and the climate it created, and the
Palin poster in<BR>>>> particular, had nothing to do with the
shooting. In between the<BR>>>> extreme all and nothing
claims are a variety of more plausible views<BR>>>> and I
haven't said which of those I accept because I really don't
know<BR>>>> what to say about
it.<BR>>>><BR>>>> You say "Stop trying to tarnish
your ideological 'enemies' with<BR>>>> reasons for a event
that just are not there." But this is such a joke<BR>>>> it
is not funny. I'm merely asking that Palin and others stop using
a<BR>>>> "bullseye" to target their political enemies, that
the right stop<BR>>>> referring to everyone on the left as a
communist, that they stop the<BR>>>> distortion and the
over-the-top rhetoric. That we realize, as one V<BR>>>> post
put it, we are hovering around the same spot on the
political<BR>>>> compass. Again, there is nothing radical
about any of this and it is<BR>>>> precisely the very same
request that you're making. So I find that<BR>>>>
ironic!<BR>>>><BR>>>> Add to this that if I had
political motives, what I'd do is keep my<BR>>>> mouth shut
wrt criticisms of Palin. What I'd try to do is get her
to<BR>>>> win the Republican nomination since she is one of
handful of people<BR>>>> that Obama has a chance of beating.
She is simply not electable. I<BR>>>> hope she does win the
Republican nomination for that very reason (but<BR>>>> she
won't). So if I were playing political gamesmanship I'd keep
quiet<BR>>>> about her. I wouldn't criticize her. It makes no
sense to criticize<BR>>>> her if you're a Democrat and your
only concern is to get Democrats<BR>>>> elected. She is the
best thing for the party in years. But I'm out of<BR>>>>
politics and have more broad social concerns, like the well being
of<BR>>>> our country. I'm using this as an opportunity to
try to get the<BR>>>> over-the-top rhetoric to
stop.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Lastly, wrt to your claims about
"surveyor symbols" that is just plain<BR>>>> stupid. I'm not
saying you are stupid since I don't think for a minute<BR>>>>
that you believe that story. So the fact that I don't believe it
can't<BR>>>> be a slight against me. No one believes that
story, and we're not all<BR>>>> members of the uber left.
Even the folks telling that story don't<BR>>>> believe
it.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Here's a nice article on the
issue.<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> <A
href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2011/01/gunsights_or_surveyor_symbols.html"></A><A
href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2011/01/gunsights_or_surveyor_symbols.html"></A><A
href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2011/01/gunsights_or_surveyor_symbols.html"><A
href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2011/01/gunsights_or_surveyor_symbols.html">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2011/01/gunsights_or_surveyor_symbols.html</A></A><BR>>>><BR>>>>
At the end of this article there is a comment from Palin
herself,<BR>>>> tweeted after the election: "Remember months
ago 'bullseye' icon used<BR>>>> 2 target the 20
Obamacare-lovin' incumbent seats? We won 18 out of 20<BR>>>>
(90% success rate;T'aint bad)."<BR>>>><BR>>>>
Nothing about surveying here from the horses mouth. Try
explaining<BR>>>> this! Or better yet, try dropping this
stupid fairytale altogether. NO<BR>>>> one is buying
it.<BR>>>><BR>>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:25 PM,
the lockshop <<A href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com"></A><A
href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com"><A
href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com">lockshop@pull.twcbc.com</A></A>><BR>>>>
wrote:<BR>>>>> The symbol means here, this place, this
location on the map. In other<BR>>>>>
words<BR>>>>> this is a district where we would like a
Republican to be in office. Sort<BR>>>>>
of<BR>>>>> like X marks the spot. Why the uber left keeps
trying to make this<BR>>>>> tragedy<BR>>>>>
about Sarah and the right is really an unsavory mystery. The shooter
was<BR>>>>> crazy. Stop trying to tarnish your ideological
"enemies" with reasons for<BR>>>>> a<BR>>>>>
event that just are not there.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
g<BR>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe
Campbell"<BR>>>>> <<A
href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com"></A><A
href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com"><A
href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com">philosopher.joe@gmail.com</A></A>><BR>>>>>
To: <<A href="mailto:nickgier@roadrunner.com"></A><A
href="mailto:nickgier@roadrunner.com"><A
href="mailto:nickgier@roadrunner.com">nickgier@roadrunner.com</A></A>><BR>>>>>
Cc: <<A href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"></A><A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"><A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A></A>><BR>>>>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 4:46 PM<BR>>>>> Subject:
Re: [Vision2020] A Resolution for the 112th Congress (after
the<BR>>>>> Tucson
Tragedy)<BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
Another question: What possible meaning or significance could
surveyor<BR>>>>> symbols have? Why that
symbol?<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011
at 4:26 PM, <<A href="mailto:nickgier@roadrunner.com"></A><A
href="mailto:nickgier@roadrunner.com"><A
href="mailto:nickgier@roadrunner.com">nickgier@roadrunner.com</A></A>>
wrote:<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> A note to Roger
and Gary:<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> When
Democrats start calling for "Second Amendment" solutions, then
I<BR>>>>>> will<BR>>>>>> consider your
losing battle to make Democrats more
violent.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> If Palin
meant those to be surveyor symbols, why did she accompany
the<BR>>>>>> map<BR>>>>>> with the tweet
"Don't Retreat, Reload"? Could it be that the
webmaster<BR>>>>>> couldn't find the cross-hairs symbol
that he really intended and
needed?<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
Nick<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> A RESOLUTION FOR
THE 112TH CONGRESS<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
Whereas, the Pima County Sheriff rightly said that violent rhetoric
has<BR>>>>>>
consequences;<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Whereas,
abortion clinic doctors were marked with cross-hairs and
“four<BR>>>>>> doctors, two clinic employees, a
security guard, and a clinic escort<BR>>>>>>
were<BR>>>>>>
killed”;<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Whereas, GOP
Senate candidate Sharon Angle and Tea Party
leaders<BR>>>>>> declared<BR>>>>>> that
a “Second Amendment” solution may be necessary for the
Obama<BR>>>>>>
administration;<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
Whereas, in November of 2009 a person brought a handgun to one of
now<BR>>>>>> critically wounded Rep. Gabriel Giffords’
community gatherings;<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
Whereas, GOP Vice-Presidential candidate Sarah Palin targeted
22<BR>>>>>> Democratic seats with a symbol that
Giffords, a gun owner, took as<BR>>>>>> cross-hairs
(the map was followed by a tweet that said “Don’t
Retreat,<BR>>>>>>
Reload”);<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Whereas,
Gifford’s opponent Jesse Kelley asked supporters to "shoot
a<BR>>>>>> fully automatic M16" to "get on target" and
help "remove Gabrielle<BR>>>>>>
Giffords";<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Whereas, on
Fox Business News Sarah Palin offered praise for Kelly:
"I<BR>>>>>> don't feel worthy to lace his combat
boots";<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Whereas, on
January 12, 2011 four GOP leaders in Arizona, criticized
as<BR>>>>>> McCain supporters, resigned after violent
threats from Tea Party<BR>>>>>>
activists;<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Whereas,
Giffords’ office was vandalized right after she voted for
the<BR>>>>>> Affordable Health Care
Act;<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Whereas, the U.S.
lags other industrialized countries in mental
health<BR>>>>>> services, and Arizona ranks second to
last in the U.S.;<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
Whereas, repeal of the Affordable Health Care Act has no chance
of<BR>>>>>> passing<BR>>>>>>
Congress;<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Whereas,
Americans, sometime by polls of 2-1, support major aspects
of<BR>>>>>> the<BR>>>>>> Affordable
Health Care Act;<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
Therefore Be it Resolved that the repeal of the Affordable Health
Care<BR>>>>>> Act<BR>>>>>> be
withdrawn;<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Be It
Further Resolved that more funds be provided for mental
health<BR>>>>>>
treatment;<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> And May It
Further Resolved that all Americans stop demonizing
their<BR>>>>>> political and religious opponents and
refrain from using violent<BR>>>>>>
rhetoric<BR>>>>>> about
them.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> And Finally May
It Be Resolved that on the eve of the MLK Holiday
all<BR>>>>>> Americans attempt to embrace the ethics of
non-violence that Martin<BR>>>>>>
Luther<BR>>>>>> King drew from Mahatma Gandhi and his
own Christian faith.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
=======================================================<BR>>>>>>
List services made available by First Step
Internet,<BR>>>>>> serving the communities of the
Palouse since 1994.<BR>>>>>> <A
href="http://www.fsr.net"></A><A href="http://www.fsr.net"></A><A
href="http://www.fsr.net"><A
href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A></A><BR>>>>>>
<A href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"></A><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"></A><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A></A><BR>>>>>>
=======================================================<BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
=======================================================<BR>>>>>
List services made available by First Step
Internet,<BR>>>>> serving the communities of the Palouse
since
1994.<BR>>>>>
<A href="http://www.fsr.net"></A><A href="http://www.fsr.net"></A><A
href="http://www.fsr.net"><A
href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A></A><BR>>>>>
<A href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"></A><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"></A><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A></A><BR>>>>>
=======================================================<BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>>>>> Checked
by AVG - <A href="http://www.avg.com"></A><A
href="http://www.avg.com"></A><A href="http://www.avg.com"><A
href="http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</A></A><BR>>>>>
Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3375 - Release Date:
01/11/11<BR>>>>>
23:38:00<BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>>
=======================================================<BR>>>>
List services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>>>>
serving the communities of the Palouse since
1994.<BR>>>>
<A href="http://www.fsr.net"></A><A href="http://www.fsr.net"></A><A
href="http://www.fsr.net"><A
href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A></A><BR>>>>
<A href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"></A><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"></A><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A></A><BR>>>>
=======================================================</DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P></P>
<HR>
<P></P><BR>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>Checked by AVG -
<A href="http://www.avg.com"><A
href="http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</A></A> <BR>Version: 9.0.872 /
Virus Database: 271.1.1/3377 - Release Date: 01/12/11
23:34:00<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P></P>
<HR>
<P></P><BR>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>Checked by AVG - <A
href="http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</A> <BR>Version: 9.0.872 / Virus
Database: 271.1.1/3377 - Release Date: 01/12/11
23:34:00<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>