Emoticons would come in handy on this listserv. I was also attempting humor.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Joe Campbell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com">philosopher.joe@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">You're reading too much into this Darrell. I was trying to be funny!<br>
I'm nothing if not blunt. If I wanted to say something else, I'd have<br>
said it. No use holding back now.<br>
<br>
I appreciate philosophy in all forms, these posts included. I'm<br>
suspicious about original motives but the posts are harmless and you<br>
and others enjoy them. Besides, no harm no foul!<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Darrell Keim <<a href="mailto:keim153@gmail.com">keim153@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Joe:<br>
> If I didn't know any better, I might think you were hinting to Jeff he had<br>
> posted enough on this topic.<br>
> Surely not, as you have strongly defended the importance of V participants<br>
> ability to discuss whatever they like, at whatever length they like, in the<br>
> recent past.<br>
> I hope he continues. I spent many years volunteering and working for a<br>
> values development organization. His list isn't as succinct as the list of<br>
> values the organization I worked for espoused. Still, I've found some of<br>
> the notes thought provoking. And what harm can come from cogitating on and<br>
> discussing values?<br>
> I hope you are enjoying the holiday.<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Joe Campbell <<a href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com">philosopher.joe@gmail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> ...Would it be<br>
>> PURPOSELESS? I don't suppose this is a value, is it? I checked and it<br>
>> is NOT on the list...<br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>