<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=unicode" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.7600.16671"></HEAD>
<BODY style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
id=MailContainerBody leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area">
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri>Yes let's:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri>The CBO doesn't (couldn't) take into
account the sham that is the "doctors fix' and the "medicare spending
reductions" that will either not be enacted due to the din of howling
seniors or, if implanted, will shift costs to the states and in turn
to the doctors and hospitals, decreasing supplies of both while increasing
demand.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri>Granted since the midterm elections, cap
and tax is as dead as Pelosi's speakership but, that was not the case at
the time of the tea parties conception. There is still talk of enacting some of
its more costly provisions through regulatory channels. Please detail for
me the senate plan for rebates for loses due to jobs sent over seas or
eliminated entirely. Reduced Government watchdogs such as the tea party movement
do well to be attentive.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri>What a joke! Of course the money had
an effect on payrolls. The only way it would not have would have been to
simply light it on fire. (something I do not put past the Obama whitehouse) The
administration has spent 110 Billion of the 787 Billion appropriated. Would you
like to show me how that has positively impacted jobless numbers and housing
starts? Preventing the incineration of the remaining 675 Billion
and change is a legitimate concern for tea party members.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri>As to the government payroll, the number
of federal employees making 150,000.00 or more a year has doubled since Obama
took office. In addition, the president plans to give<FONT color=#ff0000
face="Times New Roman"> <FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri>to give a 1.4%
across-the-board pay raise to 2.1 million federal workers. Workers who, for the
most part, are being compensated at a level that is considerably greater then
that of their private sector counterparts. Big money in terms of the defict? No.
A worry for small government conservatives? You
betcha.</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face=Calibri>g</DIV>
<DIV><BR itxtvisited="1"><FONT face="Times New Roman"> </FONT><BR
itxtvisited="1"></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000
face=Calibri></FONT><BR><BR><BR><BR>--------------------------------------------------<BR>From:
"Andreas Schou" <ophite@gmail.com><BR>Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010
2:34 PM<BR>To: "Gary Crabtree" <jampot@roadrunner.com><BR>Cc: "keely
emerinemix" <kjajmix1@msn.com>; <v2020@ssl.fastmail.fm>;
<lfalen@turbonet.com>; <ckovis@turbonet.com>;
<vision2020@moscow.com><BR>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Alaska vote
count<BR><BR>> Let's just talk about all this:<BR>> <BR>>> surely a
huge increase in health care spending,<BR>> <BR>> There isn't one. The CBO
score on the ACA is a net positive.<BR>> <BR>>> the enormous expense of
cap & trade,<BR>> <BR>> Cap-and-trade didn't even pass the Senate, and
(in its Senate<BR>> chairman's mark) rebated the money to energy consumers on
the back<BR>> end.<BR>> <BR>>> continued ineffective stimulus
spending,<BR>> <BR>> First off, even Republican economists concede that
the stimulus had an<BR>> effect on total payrolls -- like, for instance,
Douglas Holtz-Eakin,<BR>> McCain's top economics advisor. Second, what bill
is or was continuing<BR>> to proceed through Congress that even proposes to
continue stimulus<BR>> spending?<BR>> <BR>>> an unprecedented
increase in government payroll<BR>> <BR>> Government employment has shrunk
under Obama, unless you count<BR>> temporary census workers.<BR>> <BR>>
-- ACS</DIV></BODY></HTML>