<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Yeah, I know. But I've already pissed everyone off . . . I figured "Kentucky" would be safer!<br><br><font style="" color="#8064a2"><font style="font-size: 12pt;" size="3"><font style="" face="Verdana">Keely<br>www.keely-prevailingwinds.com<br></font></font></font><br><br><br><br><hr id="stopSpelling">From: deco@moscow.com<br>To: vision2020@moscow.com<br>Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:58:47 -0700<br>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] FW: discharging firearms- was Pres mans-up, Crabtree doesn't<br><br>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft SafeHTML">
<style>
.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P
{padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-top:0px;}
.ExternalClass BODY.ecxhmmessage
{font-family:Tahoma;font-size:10pt;}
</style>
<div><font face="Verdana">Kentucky? Try every northern county of this
state!</font></div>
<div><font face="Verdana"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Verdana">w.</font></div>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 0px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;">
<div style="font: 10pt arial;">----- Original Message ----- </div>
<div style="font: 10pt arial; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% rgb(228, 228, 228);"><b>From:</b>
<a title="kjajmix1@msn.com" href="mailto:kjajmix1@msn.com">keely emerinemix</a>
</div>
<div style="font: 10pt arial;"><b>To:</b> <a title="dickow@turbonet.com" href="mailto:dickow@turbonet.com">dickow@turbonet.com</a> ; <a title="vision2020@moscow.com" href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</a> </div>
<div style="font: 10pt arial;"><b>Sent:</b> Friday, November 05, 2010 1:21
PM</div>
<div style="font: 10pt arial;"><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Vision2020] FW: discharging
firearms- was Pres mans-up, Crabtree doesn't</div>
<div><br></div>Not really responding to the "bear/use" argument, but along the
same line . . . I continually wonder why the phrase "well-regulated militia"
in the Second Amendment doesn't get more discussion. It seems to me that
a bunch of poorly informed, angry, hate-fueled, paranoid men crawling around a
Kentucky forest in greasepaint with little supervision and lots of powerful
arms and ammo can't possibly be a "well-regulated" ANYTHING, much less a
"militia." If these types of people would submit to commonsense
regulation, order, discipline, accountability and the occasional intrusion of
fact, perhaps we could then consider their gun rights in a different
light.<br><br>Frankly, these "militias" are an insult to the brave men and
women in the U.S. armed forces, and the worst possible argument in favor of
wide-open gun ownership and use.<br><br><font color="#8064a2"><font style="font-size: 12pt;" size="3"><font face="Verdana">Keely<br>www.keely-prevailingwinds.com<br></font></font></font><br><br><br><br>>
From: dickow@turbonet.com<br>> To: vision2020@moscow.com<br>> Date: Fri,
5 Nov 2010 12:43:52 -0700<br>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] FW: discharging
firearms- was Pres mans-up, Crabtree doesn't<br>> <br>> Thanks, Tom! The
Webster online does NOT indicate that 'to bear' (at least<br>> in the case
of bearing arms) means also 'to use.' I feel better now.<br>> <br>> Bob
Dickow, troublemaker<br>> <br>> -----Original Message-----<br>> From:
vision2020-bounces@moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com]<br>>
On Behalf Of Robert Dickow<br>> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 12:01
PM<br>> To: vision2020@moscow.com<br>> Subject: [Vision2020] FW:
discharging firearms- was Pres mans-up, Crabtree<br>> doesn't<br>>
<br>> Well, I guess if 'to bear' means also 'to use,' then my argument does
not<br>> hold. However, I must say that that definition was not my
lifelong<br>> understanding of the meaning of 'to bear,' which is means 'to
carry,' as in<br>> 'to bear a heavy load of wood.' Using the wood is
another thing altogether.<br>> ("Hand me that match, will ya? I want to
finish up bearing my wood now.")<br>> <br>> Bob Dickow, troublemaker
<br>> <br>> -----Original Message-----<br>> From:
vision2020-bounces@moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces@moscow.com]<br>>
On Behalf Of Garrett Clevenger<br>> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 11:32
AM<br>> To: vision2020_moscow.com<br>> Subject: [Vision2020] discharging
firearms- was Pres mans-up, Crabtree<br>> doesn't<br>> <br>> Bob
writes:<br>> <br>> "But to complicate things, keep in mind that although
the Constitution<br>> protects the right to keep and bear arms, it says
nothing about our rights<br>> to discharge those arms."<br>> <br>>
<br>> >From what my dictionary says, "to bear" means "to hold and use"
which in<br>> the case of a firearm seems to me to mean to
discharge.<br>> <br>> If a law prevents someone from using their gun,
how is that not<br>> unconstitutional? (I'm playing the devil's advocate
here)<br>> <br>> I suppose that since there are laws that limit free
speech, I suppose<br>> interpretation of our constitutional amendments is
very subjective.<br>> <br>> gclev<br>> <br>>
=======================================================<br>> List services
made available by First Step Internet, <br>> serving the communities of the
Palouse since 1994. <br>> http://www.fsr.net <br>>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>>
=======================================================<br>> <br>>
=======================================================<br>> List services
made available by First Step Internet, <br>> serving the communities of the
Palouse since 1994. <br>> http://www.fsr.net <br>>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>>
=======================================================<br>> <br>>
=======================================================<br>> List services
made available by First Step Internet, <br>> serving the communities of the
Palouse since 1994. <br>> http://www.fsr.net <br>>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>>
=======================================================<br>
<BR><hr>
<BR>=======================================================<br> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <br> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<br>
http://www.fsr.net
<br>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>=======================================================</blockquote>
<br>=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
======================================================= </body>
</html>