<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=WordSection1>
<p class=MsoNormal>Courtesy of today’s (August 26, 2010)
Spokesman-Review.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div style='mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal style='border:none;padding:0in'><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Board of Tax Appeals rules Hart missed deadline<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Panel won’t consider use of legislative privilege<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>BOISE – Idaho’s state Board of Tax Appeals has
rejected state Rep. Phil Hart’s appeal of an order to pay $53,000 in back
state income taxes, penalties and interest, saying his appeal wasn’t
timely, despite his argument that his status as a state lawmaker should give
him more time than others.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Hart argued that he should have months extra to file his
appeal because of the state Constitution’s provision granting freedom
from arrest or civil process to state legislators during legislative sessions
or 10 days before they begin; the appeal period ran out 10 days before the
start of this year’s legislative session.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>But even if that argument were correct, the board found,
Hart still missed the appeal deadlines.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The board’s decision is especially significant because
Hart faces a pending ethics charge of abuse of legislative privilege for
repeatedly citing the constitutional privilege to win delays in his state and
federal income tax fights. A special House Ethics Committee, which earlier
voted 4-3 along party lines to clear Hart of a conflict-of-interest charge,
delayed considering the abuse of privilege charge to await the decision of the
Board of Tax Appeals.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Hart couldn’t immediately be reached for comment
Wednesday; the office of his Coeur d’Alene lawyer, Starr Kelso, said it
had not yet received the decision, which was issued Tuesday in Boise and
mailed. Hart could appeal the decision to district court, though a win there
would simply bounce the case back to the same board for a hearing.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>“The courts have not had occasion to opine on the
application of legislative immunity to the type of circumstances presented
here,” the board wrote in its unanimous decision. “Likewise, this
board will not make a finding regarding the validity of the argument. Even if
Appellant’s position is accepted (for the sake of argument), we find the
appeal untimely.”<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>That’s because Hart didn’t file his appeal until
March 31. His 91-day appeal period – from the time he was ordered to pay
on Oct. 2 – ran out on Jan. 1. The legislative session started on Jan. 10,
and ended on March 28. So even if he was entitled to put off his deadline
during the entire legislative session, he’d only have had one day to file
once it ended – and he took two.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>There’s more: The board found that Hart failed to pay
the required 20 percent prepayment to file an appeal until April 14 – two
weeks later. He paid part upfront on March 31, and then paid part later,
marking a second missed deadline.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>“On its face, it appears Appellant’s appeal was
untimely filed on both counts,” the board wrote in its decision.
“The board is without jurisdiction to hear this appeal. … The
statute contains no waiver or exception to the filing standards.”<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>State Rep. Tom Loertscher, R-Iona, chairman of the House
Ethics Committee, said, “I think the Ethics Committee would want to know
why the thing hadn’t been done in a more timely fashion.”<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Asked in June by The Spokesman-Review why he didn’t
file his appeal in October, November or December, Hart said, “I
don’t know. We were putting our game plan together.”<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Loertscher said the committee delayed considering the abuse
of privilege charge “because we just didn’t want to muddy the water
for that appeal. So as soon as I get word about that and everything’s put
together, then we’ll probably convene the committee again.”<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>He said, “We’ll have to make the determination
now as to whether or not he’s abused this constitutional privilege or
not. Quite frankly, this is probably the more serious of the two charges in the
complaint.”<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The ethics complaint against Hart, filed by House Minority
Leader John Rusche, D-Lewiston, charged Hart with possible abuse of the
privilege and with conflicts of interest for voting on and sponsoring tax
legislation while pressing his own personal fight against the state Tax
Commission over back income taxes.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Hart is a third-term Republican from Athol with a history of
tax protesting. He stopped filing both state and federal income tax returns in
1996 while he pressed an unsuccessful lawsuit claiming the federal income tax
was unconstitutional. He’s since been wrangling with both federal and
state authorities over back payments. Public records show he owes nearly
$700,000 in state and federal taxes, penalties and interest. In his state
appeal, Hart also argued unsuccessfully that the state income tax is
unconstitutional.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Hart was unopposed for re-election to a fourth term in
November until Howard Griffiths, a Hayden businessman, filed against him as a
write-in candidate this summer, saying he was prompted to run against the
fellow conservative Republican because of Hart’s tax woes. “We all
pay our taxes, and my feeling is what he did was wrong,” Griffiths said.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>-----------------<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>State Representative Phil Hart (R – Dist 3, Athol)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><a
href="http://media.spokesman.com/photos/2010/08/26/26_phil_hart_t620.jpg">http://media.spokesman.com/photos/2010/08/26/26_phil_hart_t620.jpg</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<div style='mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal style='border:none;padding:0in'><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Seeya round town, Moscow.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Tom Hansen<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Moscow, Idaho<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>"Corporations
are an oppressed minority forced to move headquarters from state to state in
search of friendlier tax codes--sometimes being forced to live just off our
shores in tiny mailboxes." <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>- John
Oliver, The Daily Show<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>