<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7655.1">
<TITLE>RE: [Vision2020] Judge OKs same-sex marriage in California</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Hi Ted,<BR>
<BR>
After the Texas sodomy decision Judge Scalia said that there was no longer any legal barrier to same-sex marriage. Conservatives could no longer, at least in court, raise the morality objection to these unions. It is possible that Scalia will be honest enough to stay by this open admission of legal defeat and actually support the California's judges decision?<BR>
<BR>
I've written about this issue twice and the columns can be found at www.home.roadrunner.com/~nickgier/equality.htm and /GaysSF.htm<BR>
<BR>
May we finally have liberty, justice, and equality for all,<BR>
<BR>
Nick<BR>
<BR>
Nicholas F. Gier, Professor Emeritus<BR>
Department of Philosophy, University of Idaho<BR>
"The Palouse Pundit" on Radio Free Moscow, 92.5 FM<BR>
President, Idaho Federation of Teachers, AFT/AFL-CIO www.idaho-aft.org/ift.htm<BR>
208-882-9212, 1037 Colt Rd., Moscow, ID 83843<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: vision2020-bounces@moscow.com on behalf of Ted Moffett<BR>
Sent: Thu 8/12/2010 3:40 PM<BR>
To: Contact - thansen@moscow.com<BR>
Cc: Moscow Vision 2020<BR>
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Judge OKs same-sex marriage in California<BR>
<BR>
This is likely to end up in the SCOTUS, and Justice Kennedy likely to be the<BR>
deciding vote. But if Justice Ginsberg, the oldest SCOTUS member, steps<BR>
down, her replacement could be a factor. Consider thiese quotes from the<BR>
article below:<BR>
<BR>
"Kennedy's name appears nowhere in a trial judge's 138-page opinion issued<BR>
Wednesday striking down California's Proposition 8 ban on gay marriages.<BR>
Nonetheless, Kennedy's previous decisions were cited 16 times in U.S.<BR>
District Judge Vaughn Walker's ruling that Proposition 8 violates the<BR>
Constitution.<BR>
<BR>
Walker's citations to Kennedy foreshadow the highly anticipated showdown<BR>
that's to come when the Supreme Court finally considers gay marriage."<BR>
<BR>
And:<BR>
<BR>
"Kennedy's opinion "dismantles the structure of constitutional law that has<BR>
permitted a distinction to be made between heterosexual and homosexual<BR>
unions, insofar as formal recognition in marriage is concerned," Justice<BR>
Antonin Scalia wrote in a 2003 dissent."<BR>
<BR>
<A HREF="http://www.statesman.com/news/nation/justice-kennedys-the-one-to-watch-on-gay-847477.html">http://www.statesman.com/news/nation/justice-kennedys-the-one-to-watch-on-gay-847477.html</A><BR>
<BR>
>From website above:<BR>
Justice Kennedy's the one to watch on gay marriage California's recently<BR>
overturned ban on same-sex marriages likely to go to a sharply divided<BR>
Supreme Court.<BR>
By* Michael Doyle *<BR>
<BR>
MCCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS<BR>
<BR>
Published: 8:08 p.m. Saturday, Aug. 7, 2010<BR>
<BR>
WASHINGTON - Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy appears likely to<BR>
eventually tackle California's gay marriage ban and his role could be<BR>
crucial.<BR>
<BR>
Kennedy's name appears nowhere in a trial judge's 138-page opinion issued<BR>
Wednesday striking down California's Proposition 8 ban on gay marriages.<BR>
Nonetheless, Kennedy's previous decisions were cited 16 times in U.S.<BR>
District Judge Vaughn Walker's ruling that Proposition 8 violates the<BR>
Constitution.<BR>
<BR>
Walker's citations to Kennedy foreshadow the highly anticipated showdown<BR>
that's to come when the Supreme Court finally considers gay marriage.<BR>
<BR>
Four conservative justices on the Supreme Court are widely considered to be<BR>
unlikely to support a decision recognizing a constitutional right of gays to<BR>
marry.<BR>
<BR>
Four others, including newly sworn-in Justice Elena Kagan, seem more likely<BR>
to agree with Walker that the Constitution doesn't allow states to treat gay<BR>
couples differently from heterosexual ones, analysts said.<BR>
<BR>
The deciding vote, most analysts agree, likely will belong to Kennedy.<BR>
<BR>
"It seems the issue will clearly be close, and on close cases (Kennedy)<BR>
tends to be in the middle," said Carl Tobias, a University of Richmond law<BR>
professor.<BR>
<BR>
Kennedy wrote gay-friendly opinions in a 1996 case striking down a Colorado<BR>
ballot measure and a 2003 case striking down a Texas law that banned gay<BR>
sodomy.<BR>
<BR>
Kennedy hasn't tipped his hand on gay marriage, stressing that the 2003<BR>
Texas decision "does not involve whether the government must give formal<BR>
recognition to any relationship that homosexual persons seek to enter."<BR>
<BR>
However, some hope - and some fear - that Kennedy's sympathies are already<BR>
clear.<BR>
<BR>
Kennedy's opinion "dismantles the structure of constitutional law that has<BR>
permitted a distinction to be made between heterosexual and homosexual<BR>
unions, insofar as formal recognition in marriage is concerned," Justice<BR>
Antonin Scalia wrote in a 2003 dissent.<BR>
<BR>
The Supreme Court could look different by the time the gay marriage case<BR>
arrives, though. Some intervening steps, not all of them predictable, also<BR>
may shape the case's outcome.<BR>
<BR>
A randomly selected three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S.<BR>
Circuit Court of Appeals will review Walker's decision first. Eleven of the<BR>
9th Circuit judges then could review the appellate panel's work, in turn, in<BR>
what's called an en banc decision.<BR>
<BR>
The appellate reasoning and the resulting posture of the case could nudge<BR>
justices one way or another, though the Supreme Court never hesitates to<BR>
show who's boss. During the past two years, the Supreme Court reversed 9th<BR>
Circuit decisions in 22 out of 31 cases.<BR>
<BR>
The 9th Circuit's briefing schedule released Thursday calls for all briefs<BR>
to be submitted by late December. Oral arguments will come later.<BR>
<BR>
Because the Supreme Court typically finishes setting its docket in<BR>
mid-January, this means there won't be time to hear any appeal before the<BR>
term ends next June.<BR>
<BR>
"We're talking the 2011 term," Tobias said.<BR>
<BR>
By 2011, there might be new Supreme Court justices whose views will shape<BR>
the outcome.<BR>
<BR>
The court's oldest member now is 77-year-old Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg,<BR>
who has battled cancer several times. Although she hasn't hinted at<BR>
retiring, her departure during President Barack Obama's term could affect<BR>
the gay marriage case.<BR>
<BR>
For instance: If Democrats lose some Senate seats this November, as appears<BR>
likely, their weaker grip on the Senate could make Obama more likely to pick<BR>
a moderate replacement for the Supreme Court rather than an avowed liberal.<BR>
<BR>
Still, for the foreseeable future, Kennedy is likely to be the go-to<BR>
justice.<BR>
<BR>
During the court's 2009-10 term, Kennedy was in the majority 82 percent of<BR>
the time, according to a tally by the nonpartisan SCOTUSblog.com. This was<BR>
more than any other justice. Kennedy has a tradition of being part of the<BR>
court's winning 5-4 majority more than any other justice, though he wasn't<BR>
in the previous term.<BR>
<BR>
Additional material from the Los Angeles Times.<BR>
<BR>
-------------------------------------------<BR>
<BR>
Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett<BR>
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Tom Hansen <thansen@moscow.com> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
> Courtesy of CNN at:<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> <A HREF="http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/08/12/california.same.sex.ruling/index.html?hpt=T2">http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/08/12/california.same.sex.ruling/index.html?hpt=T2</A><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> Judge gives the green light for same-sex marriage in California<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> Los Angeles, California (CNN) -- A federal judge ruled on Thursday to allow<BR>
> same-sex couples to marry in California, starting on August 18, handing<BR>
> another big victory to supporters of gay rights in a case that both sides<BR>
> say will likely end up in the U.S. Supreme Court.<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> Last week, Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker in San Francisco struck<BR>
> down the state's ban on same-sex marriage, ruling that voter-approved<BR>
> Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution. Walker had issued a temporary<BR>
> stay on his decision, which on Thursday he said he would lift.<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> The high-profile case is being watched closely by supporters and opponents<BR>
> of same-sex marriage, as many say it will make its way to the U.S. Supreme<BR>
> Court. If it does, the case could result in a landmark decision on whether<BR>
> people in the United States are allowed to marry people of the same sex.<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> Same-sex marriage is legal in five U.S. states and in the District of<BR>
> Columbia, while civil unions are permitted in New Jersey. The five states<BR>
> are Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, Iowa and New Hampshire.<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> Seeya round town, Moscow.<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> Tom Hansen<BR>
><BR>
> Moscow, Idaho<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> "If I wanted to overhear every tedious scrap of brain static rattling<BR>
> around in your head, I'd read your blog."<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> - Bill Maher<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>