<div class="storytitle" id="post-3846"><a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/04/second-cru-inquiry-reports/">http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/04/second-cru-inquiry-reports/</a></div>

<div class="storytitle"> </div>
<div class="storytitle"><font size="4">Second CRU inquiry reports</font></div>
<div class="storytitle"><font size="4"></font> </div>
<div class="storytitle"><font size="4">Filed under: </font></div>
<div class="meta">
<ul class="post-categories">
<li><a title="View all posts in Climate Science" href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/category/climate-science/" rel="category tag">Climate Science</a> 
<li><a title="View all posts in Instrumental  Record" href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/category/climate-science/instrumental-record/" rel="category tag">Instrumental Record</a></li></li></ul>— gavin @ 14 April 2010 </div>

<div class="entry">
<p>The <a href="http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/press/CRUstatements/Report+of+the+Science+Assessment+Panel">Oxburgh report</a> on the science done at the CRU has now been published and….. as in the <a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/03/first-cru-inquiry-report-released/">first inquiry</a>, they find no scientific misconduct, no impropriety and no tailoring of the results to a preconceived agenda, though they do suggest more statisticians should have been involved. They have also some choice words to describe the critics.</p>

<p>Carry on…</p></div>
<div class="feedback"> <a title="Comment on Second CRU inquiry reports" onclick="wpopen(this.href); return false" href="http://www.realclimate.org/?comments_popup=3846">Comments (pop-up) (1,032)</a> </div>
<div class="feedback">------------------------------------------</div>
<div class="feedback">Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett</div>