<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.7600.16535">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
id=MailContainerBody leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 bgColor=#ffffff
CanvasTabStop="true" name="Compose message area">
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>Damning assertions, based on arcane knowledge you are
"not at liberty to divulge" (aided, of course, by your intrepid junior
sidekick hanson's disjoined "facts" and ersatz "effing" emphasis) doesn't
strike me as much of an argument. As to your questions, take them up with the
prosecutor. My only point was that making condemning statements of fact with
regard to an entire congregation (Christ Church shields and enables child
molesters) because you have an irrational fear of its Pastor is factually
incorrect and rhetorically indefensible . Accusing others of playing
ego games because they refuse to pander to your delusional eccentricities is
just plain goofy.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>Please don't bother with another lengthy list
of conspiratorial questions and unproven (and improvable) scenarios, I've
got better things to do with my weekend then to indulge you and hanson in
your wacky obsessions.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Calibri>g</FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV><FONT size=3 face=Calibri></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
title="mailto:deco@moscow.com CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, April 15, 2010 6:15 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A
title="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] Richard Dawkins calls for arrest of
PopeBenedictXVI</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Andreas,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>As I told you before, I wouldn't trust you with any sensitive
information, let alone confidences. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>You are free to draw your own inferences. But I notice
that neither you nor Crabtree have provided answers to questions which included
statements of fact (evidence) presented in this and similar
discussions.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Here's some more questions: </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Did some or all the so-called "counseling sessions" that
occurred between Sitler and Wilson after Sitler's Latah County crime(s) was
discovered but in the six months before he was charges occur in Idaho?
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Did the material for the sweetheart plea bargain come in large
part from these "counseling sessions?"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>What is the relation to the above questions, and the fact that
no arrest warrant was issued in either Idaho or Washington despite there being
more than adequate probable cause for such warrants?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>What relation do these questions have to do with the "smoking
gun" theory of evidence, i.e. a smoking gun means that it was recently
fired?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Until you or Crabtree are able to give a coherent answers to
the questions raised that point to some other theory, I will assume that neither
of you are interested in the miscarriage of justice that occurred in this case
and the horrible message about child molestation it sends, but are instead
playing ego games.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>W.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=ophite@gmail.com href="mailto:ophite@gmail.com">Andreas Schou</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=lockshop@pull.twcbc.com
href="mailto:lockshop@pull.twcbc.com">the lockshop</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=thansen@moscow.com
href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com">Tom Hansen</A> ; <A title=deco@moscow.com
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> ; <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, April 15, 2010 4:24
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] Richard Dawkins
calls for arrest of PopeBenedictXVI</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Wayne --<BR><BR>Are we simply to draw whatever inferences you
choose from the<BR>information you fail to provide?<BR><BR>-- ACS</BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>=======================================================<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================</BODY></HTML>