<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Thanks, Andreas, for clearing it up. And I agree -- Parks will be in prison 'til he's old, and I hope he undergoes the heart-change that could prevent this horrible crime from in a sense claiming another victim. I'm unalterably opposed to the death penalty, and I despise what he did, but I still pray for him.<br><br><font style="" color="#8064a2"><font style="font-size: 12pt;" size="3"><font style="" face="Verdana">Keely<br>www.keely-prevailingwinds.com<br></font></font></font><br><br><br><br>> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:07:34 -0800<br>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Say What??????<br>> From: ophite@gmail.com<br>> To: kjajmix1@msn.com<br>> CC: bear@moscow.com; vision2020@moscow.com<br>> <br>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:52 PM, keely emerinemix <kjajmix1@msn.com> wrote:<br>> > I'm glad this is going to be resolved without the county's financial<br>> > collapse, but doesn't 15 years for manslaughter -- the wanton, willful<br>> > destruction of a human life, and in this case a premeditated willingness not<br>> > reflected in the plea -- seem odd in light of 25 years for the wanton,<br>> > willful destruction of property?<br>> <br>> As I understand it, Arson 1 is reserved for arsons resulting in loss<br>> of human life, or arsons designed to cover up another crime. In this<br>> case, as is usual, I suspect it's a fallback charge for when the arson<br>> has actually destroyed some important evidence. The actual crimes in<br>> the final accounting are a travesty, but the numbers -- 40 years,<br>> which is essentially 'all meaningful parts of his life' -- are pretty<br>> close to what I expected when they walked back from the original<br>> capital charge.<br>> <br>> -- ACS<br> <br /><hr />Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. <a href='http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390710/direct/01/' target='_new'>Get it now.</a></body>
</html>