<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18876">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>It is also time to seriously rethink and to alter the
longstanding laws that shield individual corporate members from criminal and
civil liability resulting from corporate acts. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I have had extensive experience here. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I can assure you that corporate laws are used to allow without
consequences to the individuals criminal acts and torts of the
incorporators and members acting under the guise of the corporation.
This goes for so-called religious associations also which are also protected
under the same kind of corporate shield laws.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Wayne A. Fox<BR>1009 Karen Lane<BR>PO Box 9421<BR>Moscow,
ID 83843</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><A href="mailto:waf@moscow.com">waf@moscow.com</A><BR>208
882-7975</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=lfalen@turbonet.com href="mailto:lfalen@turbonet.com">lfalen</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, January 26, 2010 10:40
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Vision2020] Supreme Court
Decision on donations by companies andunions.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Not having read the Supreme Court Decision , it is hard to
figure out just what the justification was. They apparently consider
corporations and unions to have the same statis as individuals under the First
Amendment. This seems to be a bit of a stretch. Investors and Union Members
may not all agree with the political views of the said organization. No one
should be required to donate to a cause they do not believe in. Investors
would therefore have to pull their money out of any corporation that made
political donations to any cause that they did not agree with. This would be a
little harder for union members that live in states that do not have Right to
Work Laws. It would therefore seem to me that the decision was in error and a
violation of individual right. People should still have the right to donate to
groups that are set up to advocate a particular point of
view.<BR>Roger<BR><BR>=======================================================<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
<A
href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A>
<BR> <A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>=======================================================</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>