<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><DIV>God didn't slaughter anyone. He gave people free will. They refused to heed His WORD and died because they didn't believe in God or his WORD. They were fools and only believed in their false intellect. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You won't find a better definition of Good than God. Notice how closely they are spelled, coincidence?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Your Friend,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Donovan Arnold</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR>--- On <B>Mon, 11/16/09, Paul Rumelhart <I><godshatter@yahoo.com></I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><BR>From: Paul <SPAN><SPAN>Rumelhart</SPAN></SPAN> <godshatter@yahoo.com><BR>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] And Yet, The Saga Continues . . .<BR>To: "Donovan Arnold" <donovanjarnold2008@yahoo.com><BR>Cc: "Ted <SPAN>Moffett</SPAN>" <starbliss@gmail.com>, vision2020@moscow.com<BR>Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 5:20 AM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=plainMail>Donovan Arnold wrote:<BR>> I certainly agree that people can be kind, friendly and well intentioned human beings without believing in a God. But I personally disagree that is it possible to be "Good" without God, since God is the definition of all things good. So "Good Without God" is an illogical statement.<BR>> <BR><BR>Are we talking about the same God that slaughtered the entire population of the Earth, minus a handful, by bringing forth the flood waters?<BR><BR>No offense to believers, but I'm shopping around for a better definition of the word "good".<BR><BR>Paul<BR><BR><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table><br>