<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18828">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>There is no doubt that Greg Kimberling did not email John
Weber. He says so. That was not the issue I raised.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>My questions concerned about how the letter allegedly
<STRONG><EM><U><FONT color=#ff0000 size=5>written</FONT></U></EM></STRONG> by
John Weber got to Kimberling:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><FONT face=Verdana><FONT size=3>"Since, Kimberling
writes in his second email that he has never communicated with John Weber via
email, but then says apparently contradictorily: <FONT
color=#0000ff>"</FONT><FONT color=#0000ff>John <STRONG><EM><U><FONT
color=#ff0000>wrote </FONT></U></EM></STRONG>back his response and I thought it
might be appropriate to post it on the website." <FONT color=#000000> A
look at the first email below shows it is not a forwarded email, but originated
with Kimberling.</FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><FONT size=3 face=Verdana></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><FONT size=3 face=Verdana><STRONG><FONT
size=6>From whence, from whom, and how did the response allegedly by Weber
get to Kimberling? Who really wrote the response attributed to John
Weber?</FONT></STRONG> <STRONG><FONT size=6>"</FONT></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><STRONG><FONT size=6
face=Verdana></FONT></STRONG> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>It appears that it is you that needs to make an adjustment,
perhaps in the care that you take to read the issue I raised.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>W.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=keim153@gmail.com href="mailto:keim153@gmail.com">Darrell Keim</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=deco@moscow.com
href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">Art Deco</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, November 02, 2009 6:14
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] Just
Curious</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Wayne:<BR><BR>I suggest that you need to adjust the tinfoil in
your hat. It seems<BR>to be a bit tight.<BR><BR>The answer lies in the
2nd email you quote from Greg: I simply made<BR>contact with John through his
sister and asked what the deal was.<BR><BR>I'll bet Greg didn't email
John. He probably used the "contact us"<BR>section on the Weber web
page. I also notified the Weber campaign of<BR>the website problems via
"contact us". I got the same email that Greg<BR>did, in fact both of our
addresses were on it. Greg had already<BR>forwarded it to this list, so
I took no further action. Incidentally,<BR>I did not get my reply
directly from John Weber. I received it from a<BR>third party (probably
the person in charge of his website, which is, I<BR>think, his
sister).<BR><BR>I would like to take this time to say: It looks like we
have two well<BR>qualified candidates for mayor. Both represent very
different visions<BR>for Moscow. I encourage all v2020 to get out and
vote for the<BR>candidate that best represents their vision for our little
burg. Good<BR>luck to both candidates!<BR><BR>On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at
6:13 PM, Art Deco <<A href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">deco@moscow.com</A>>
wrote:<BR>> To those that may wonder too:<BR>><BR>> Below are copies
of two emails from Greg Kimberling.<BR>><BR>> The first contains a
letter allegedly written by John Weber in response to<BR>> questions raised
on V2020 (and elsewhere) about the truth of certain<BR>> statements then on
Weber's campaign website.<BR>><BR>> The second is a response by Greg
Kimberling to the question: "Does Weber<BR>> use email?"<BR>><BR>>
Since, Kimberling writes in his second email that he has never
communicated<BR>> with John Weber via email, but then says apparently
contradictorily: "John<BR>> wrote back his response and I thought it might
be appropriate to post it on<BR>> the website." A look at the first email
below shows it is not a forwarded<BR>> email, but originated with
Kimberling.<BR>><BR>> From whence, from whom, and how did the response
allegedly by Weber get to<BR>> Kimberling? Who really wrote the response
attributed to John Weber?<BR>><BR>> Perhaps someone can help this
curious, but befuddled old codger by answering<BR>> these two
questions.<BR>><BR>> Further, I am curious because over the last few
months, I emailed Weber many<BR>> times. I have never received a response
from him. But on almost all emails<BR>> sent, I received an error message
which basically said my email was<BR>> undeliverable because his box was
full. When I mentioned this to several<BR>> city staff, part of the
responses received was that Weber did not use email<BR>> since he did not
know how. Hence my questions above about the origin and<BR>> initial
transmission of his retraction of previous claims.<BR>><BR>> I agree
with the earlier statement of Tom Trail. Email is a very important<BR>> and
crucial tool for any public official when listening to and when<BR>>
responding to public concerns. Representative Trail is always quick to<BR>>
respond to my email queries and concerns, and his responses are
germane.<BR>><BR>> I'd be grateful for any help anyone can give [on
list] to relieve my<BR>> befuddlement on this issue.<BR>><BR>> Wayne
A. Fox<BR>> 1009 Karen Lane<BR>> PO Box 9421<BR>> Moscow, ID
83843<BR>><BR>> <A
href="mailto:waf@moscow.com">waf@moscow.com</A><BR>> 208
882-7975<BR>><BR>><BR>> ----- Original Message -----<BR>> From:
Greg Kimberling<BR>> To: 'Paul Rumelhart' ; 'Wayne Price' ; 'Darrell
Keim'<BR>> Cc: <A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>> Sent:
Wednesday, October 28, 2009 12:32 PM<BR>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020]
Question Concerning John Weber<BR>> Here is a response from John
Weber:<BR>><BR>> To Vision 2020 readers and participants; I regret the
error on my<BR>> Weber-Mayor.com web page.<BR>><BR>> I have never
been Moscow's Police Chief nor have I ever been the attorney<BR>> for the
City of Moscow. However I have been on the search committees that<BR>>
helped fill these positions in the past.<BR>><BR>> I would like to thank
the Moscow citizens that caught this mistake and<BR>> gave me the
opportunity to correct it, both on Vision 2020 and my web
page.<BR>><BR>> If anyone would like to discuss this with me further,
please contact me<BR>> at 208.882.6794.<BR>><BR>> John
Weber<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> ----- Original
Message -----<BR>> From: Greg Kimberling<BR>> To: 'Bill London' ; <A
href="mailto:vision2020@secure.fsr.com">vision2020@secure.fsr.com</A><BR>>
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 3:35 PM<BR>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020]
Does Weber use email?<BR>><BR>> Bill, Cathy and others:<BR>><BR>>
I appreciate your notes. My response on Vision 2020 was a practical
issue.<BR>> The discussion was based upon a number of items posted on his
campaign<BR>> website about his experience and or qualifications. Instead
of debating the<BR>> issue about facts I was unsure about I simply made
contact with John through<BR>> his sister and asked what the deal was. John
wrote back his response and I<BR>> thought it might be appropriate to post
it on the website. It seemed like a<BR>> very logical step to take
regardless of whether you support one candidate or<BR>> the
other.<BR>><BR>> I have never communicated with John through email so I
cannot answer your<BR>> question regarding an email address for him. I have
always called him up or<BR>> met with him face to face. I do not represent
his campaign or the committee<BR>> assisting him so I would suggest you
contact him directly with the phone<BR>> number he gave out –
882-6794<BR>><BR>> Best Wishes,<BR>><BR>> Greg
Kimberling<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>>
=======================================================<BR>> List services
made available by First Step Internet,<BR>> serving the communities of the
Palouse since 1994.<BR>> <A
href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A><BR>> <A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>>
=======================================================<BR>></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>