<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16850" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Really? So what was it that BHO ran or managed that
you believe would have provided the experience to run this country? Feel free to
use the dictionary of your choice. The guy never ran so much as a pop stand
before getting his current gig. Perhaps he absorbed whatever management
experience you claim he has via osmosis, sucking it up along with the hard
earned tax dollars of people who had actually earn them and, earlier
in his career, gorging on them at the public trough. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>g</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=philosopher.joe@gmail.com href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com">Joe
Campbell</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=jampot@roadrunner.com
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">g. crabtree</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=kjajmix1@msn.com
href="mailto:kjajmix1@msn.com">keely emerinemix</A> ; <A
title=vision2020@moscow.com href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, July 17, 2009 6:18 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] 30 ways to a
most powerful constabulary</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Palin has, or had, more executive experience than Obama!?! Only a geek
holding on to a dictionary definition would pretend that Palin had more
experience than Obama, relevant to the offices for which they last ran.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>She could not hack Alaska!</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>You've been critical of Palin and I'm sorry for not noting that, but
you're more defensive than you should be.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Joe Campbell</DIV>
<DIV><BR>On Jul 17, 2009, at 5:37 PM, "g. crabtree" <<A
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">jampot@roadrunner.com</A>>
wrote:<BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>1. How amazing that you should have such a
blinding insight concerning this post and yet were completely oblivious for
the run of 'Pulling a Palin' and "Sonia v. Sarah, GOP is
doomed."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>2. As to your silly assertion concerning
experience, <FONT face=Arial size=2>Governor Palin had far more executive
experience at the time of the election then BHO did. Along with that she
also had experience as a small business person, something the golden one has
yet to know and almost certainly never will.</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>3. <FONT face=Arial size=2>Please point out
where I might have said anything about Ms. Palin being a serious future
contender for the position of POTUS? </FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>4. What post is it that you imagine that it was
that I criticized? If you are referring to Ms. Mix's post of 03 July, I
pointed out that here was no evidence for the assertion that she made and
requested a cite. No criticism and, from my perspective, nothing to
apologize for. Not every error calls for sack cloth and ashes. This said,
Ms. Mix did show uncommon class. Kudos to her.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>g</FONT></DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=philosopher.joe@gmail.com
href="mailto:philosopher.joe@gmail.com">Joe Campbell</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=jampot@roadrunner.com
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">g. crabtree</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=kjajmix1@msn.com
href="mailto:kjajmix1@msn.com">keely emerinemix</A> ; <A
title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, July 17, 2009 6:59
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] 30 ways to
a most powerful constabulary</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Is Palin running for anything at the moment? Is she running against
Sotomayor? I'm not really sure why we're comparing them.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>For the record, the reason I didn't vote for her had to do with her
lack of experience not her misuse of language. But it's pretty much a done
deal since she can't even stand the heat of being Governor of Alaska, so
she is not a serious candidate for President of the US. But keep thinking
she is!</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>By the way, what conclusion should we draw from this little exercise?
Are malapropisms relevant or not? I think not which means this post of
yours is just as bad as the one you criticized (which by the way was
followed by a retraction AND an apology). On the other hand, if this kind
of crap is relevant, then you have no complaint.<BR><BR>Sent from my
iPhone</DIV>
<DIV><BR>On Jul 17, 2009, at 6:06 AM, "g. crabtree" <<A
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com"><A
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">jampot@roadrunner.com</A></A>>
wrote:<BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>For those on the list who found
Governor Palin to be a less than stellar intellect because of a totally
unsubstantiated assertion that she once confused succeed with secede,
and that wise latina Sonia Sotomeyor the paragon of the well educated
women...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>From the Weekly Standard, 20 July
edition:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<H3 class=TWSblog-entry-header>If Sarah Palin Had Said It . . .
(Update)</H3>
<DIV class=entry-content>
<DIV class=blogText>
<P>Ed Whelan <A
href="http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=N2JiMWI3NDJlMDEwZTA0NDI1M2NmYmQxN2NhMmVlMjI="
target=_blank><FONT color=#566ba0>writes</FONT></A>: </P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<P></P>
<P>Judge Sotomayor says “eminent” when she means “imminent,”
“providence” instead of “province,” “story of knowledge” instead of
“store of knowledge,” and so on. Does the fact that she is a Latina
immunize her from attention to that sort of (admittedly not uncommon)
foible?</P></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P></P>
<P>To answer Whelan's question: These malapropisms would only be
noteworthy and revealing if they were spoken by a certain country
bumpkin Republican governor of Alaska. When a wise Latina accidentally
<A
href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/05/audio_of_sotomayor_at_ricci_he.asp"
target=_blank><FONT color=#566ba0>says</FONT></A> "vagrancies of ... the
moment" instead of "vagaries of ... the moment" during the oral argument
of the <EM>Ricci</EM> case, we're supposedi to ignore the slip-up, as
the <EM>Wall Street Journal</EM> did, but <A
href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/05/29/sotomayor-tape-reveals-views-on-ricci-v-destefano-discrimination-case/"
target=_blank><FONT color=#566ba0>make sure to inform readers</FONT></A>
that they should be impressed by the fact that "The
Catholic-school-educated judge clearly knew the Latin plural of
'forum.'"</P>
<P>But enough about her errors of diction. I wouldn't want to get <A
href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=45d56e6f-f497-4b19-9c63-04e10199a085"
target=_blank><FONT color=#566ba0>Sotomayor's reputation</FONT></A> for
writing pieces "that didn't distinguish between substantive and trivial
points, with petty editing suggestions--fixing typos and the
like--rather than focusing on the core analytical issues."</P>
<P><STRONG>Update</STRONG>: <A
href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/15/good-news-sotomayor-confuses-eminent-with-imminent-twice/"
target=_blank><FONT color=#566ba0>Allahpundit has the video</FONT></A>
and a choice Sotomayor quote: "each time I see a split infinitive, an
inconsistent tense structure or the unnecessary use of the passive
voice, I blister."</P></DIV>
<DIV class=blogText id=more><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">
<DIV><SPAN>=======================================================</SPAN><BR><SPAN>List
services made available by First Step Internet, </SPAN><BR><SPAN>serving
the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
</SPAN><BR><SPAN> <A
href="http://www.fsr.net"><A
href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A></A>
</SPAN><BR><SPAN> <A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"></A><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A></A></SPAN><BR><SPAN>=======================================================</SPAN></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>