<div><strong>Joe Campbell</strong> <a title="[Vision2020] Lies, Damn Lies And Science" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:vision2020%40moscow.com?Subject=%5BVision2020%5D%20Lies%2C%20Damn%20Lies%20And%20Science&In-Reply-To=201512.89894.qm%40web37608.mail.mud.yahoo.com" target="_blank">philosopher.joe at gmail.com </a><br>
<i>Sun Apr 5 10:02:03 PDT 2009</i> wrote:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/2009-April/062709.html">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/2009-April/062709.html</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks, Paul. There are some interesting points here.<br><br>But why think someone can't get funding to try to disprove certain <br>views on global warming? I have not heard that. It isn't as if you <br>could test global warming anyway. Any tests would have to be done on some aspect of the theory and I imagine such tests are being done.<br>
---------</div>
<div>I don't know if the following high school science class text contains a description of a valid way to "test global warming" that you would find satisfactory, but given the nose thumbing at the theory common in the public, it seems many people need to go back to high school to learn basic high school science:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>'Global warming is baloney' signs put the heat on Burger King:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jun/05/burger-king-global-warming-us" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jun/05/burger-king-global-warming-us</a></div>
<div>---------</div>
<div>High School science class text on greenhouse gases and the greenhouse effect:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a style="COLOR: #00c; TEXT-DECORATION: underline" href="http://www.enviroliteracy.org/pdf/labge1.pdf">http://www.enviroliteracy.org/pdf/labge1.pdf</a>.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>-------------------------------------------</div>
<div>Vision2020 Post: Ted Moffett </div>