<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Thanks, Bruce. It appears that Thomas has, on occasion, written independent and/or dissenting opinions, and I acknowledge that I was wrong in saying he hadn't. I still contend that he's not the sharpest tool in the Court's shed, but I clearly wasn't razor-sharp on this one, either. <br><br>My remarks on white majority-accepted preferences stand, and I reiterate that Thomas wasn't the best choice for the Court, that his race played a part in his selection, and that Sotomayor's qualifications appear, to me, to be tremendously more impressive than Thomas'. <br><br>Keely<br>http://keely-prevailingwinds.blogspot.com/<br><br><br><br><br><hr id="stopSpelling">Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:42:05 -0700<br>From: jeanlivingston@turbonet.com<br>To: kjajmix1@msn.com; jampot@roadrunner.com; philosopher.joe@gmail.com<br>CC: vision2020@moscow.com<br>Subject: Justice Thomas<br><br>To a degree, your question may turn on what you mean by "stand alone." Yes, Justice Thomas has written independent opinions. The list provided by Gary appears to be just that. Now, if you are wanting to know how often he wrote an opinion -- with nobody else joining his opinion -- I cannot tell you that without looking at them all, for which I do not have the time. I know he has done that on occasion.<BR><BR>For the most part, your characterization of Justice Thomas, as one who votes with Scalia, Alito and Roberts a very high percentage of the time, is correct. However, Justice Thomas has voted differently than these justices on occasion.<BR><BR>Bruce Livingston<BR><br>-----Original message-----<br>From: keely emerinemix kjajmix1@msn.com<br>Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:06:57 -0700<br>To: jampot@roadrunner.com, philosopher.joe@gmail.com<br>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Reverse Racism?<br><br>> <br>> Yes, the subject was Thomas'
intellectual firepower as a member of the Court, which assumes a question about his acumen and capabilities before his appointment to it. I don't have time to research all of these, and so I appeal to the lawyers out there if anyone knows: Since being on the Court, has Justice Thomas written an independent, stand-alone, opinion, and has he done so in opposition to the written views of Alito, Roberts, or Scalia?<br>> <br>> Because if I'm wrong, I want to acknowledge it publicly, and will. <br>> <br>> Keely<br>> http://keely-prevailingwinds.blogspot.com/<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> From: jampot@roadrunner.com<br>> To: philosopher.joe@gmail.com<br>> CC: kjajmix1@msn.com; thansen@moscow.com; godshatter@yahoo.com; ttrail@house.state.id.us; vision2020@moscow.com<br>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Reverse Racism?<br>> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 05:38:57 -0700<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> It certainly wasn't the issue that was brought up. <br>> The comment I was replying to was Mrs. Mix's assertion that "If I'm not mistaken, he (Justice Thomas) has yet to offer an independent dissent or defense <br>> of a ruling, relying instead, it seems, on the work of Scalia and now Roberts <br>> and Alito." She was indeed mistaken. <br>> <br>> g<br>> <br>> ----- Original Message ----- <br>> From: <br>> Joe <br>> Campbell <br>> To: g. crabtree <br>> Cc: keely emerinemix ; Tom Hansen ; ; ttrail@house.state.id.us ; vision2020@moscow.com <br>> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 4:11 AM<br>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Reverse <br>> Racism?<br>> <br>> <br>> Isn't the issue about Thomas's experience BEFORE being nominated to the <br>> SC, and how it compared to Sotomayor's? <br>> <br>> Joe Campbell<br>>
<br>> On May 31, 2009, at 3:54 PM, "g. crabtree" <br>> wrote:<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> As usual, your response is long on passion and <br>> lacking in fact.<br>> <br>> From http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/author.php?thomas<br>> <br>> <br>> Writings by Justice Thomas<br>> grouped by type, in alphabetical order by first party name<br>> <br>> [ Opinions <br>> | Concurrences <br>> | Dissents <br>> | Concur in <br>> part, dissent in part ] <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Opinions<br>> 14 PENN <br>> PLAZA LLC, ET AL. v. PYETT, STEVEN, ET AL. , , 04/01/09 <br>> AETNA <br>> HEALTH INC., ETC. v. DAVILA, JUAN , 542 U.S. 200 (2004), 06/21/04 <br>> ALASKA <br>> v. NATIVE VILLAGE OF VENETIETRIBAL GOVERNMENT , 522 U.S. 520 (1998), <br>> 02/25/98 <br>> ALI, <br>> ABDUS-SHAHID M. S. v. FED.
BUREAU OF PRISONS, ET AL. , , 01/22/08 <br>> ANDERSON, <br>> DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, et al. v. EDWARDS, <br>> guardian ad litem for EDWARDS, et al. , 514 U.S. 143 (1995), 03/22/95 <br>> ASHCROFT, <br>> ATTY. GEN. v. ACLU, ET AL. , 535 U.S. 564 (2002), 05/13/02 <br>> AZ <br>> DEPT. OF REVENUE v. BLAZE CONSTR. CO. , 526 U.S. 32 (1999), 03/02/99 <br>> BARAL, <br>> DAVID H. v. UNITED STATES , 528 U.S. 431 (2000), 02/22/00 <br>> BARNHART, <br>> COMMR, SOC SEC v. SIGMON COAL CO., ET AL. , 534 U.S. 438 (2002), <br>> 02/19/02 <br>> BD. OF <br>> ED., POTTAWATOMIE CTY v. EARLS, LINDSAY, ET AL. , 536 U.S. 822 (2002), <br>> 06/27/02 <br>> BEARD, <br>> SEC., PA DOC, ET AL. v. BANKS, GEORGE E. , 542 U.S. 406 (2004), <br>> 06/24/04 <br>> BECK, <br>> ROBERT A. v. PRUPIS, ROBERT M., ET AL. , 529 U.S. 494 (2000), 00/00/00 <br>> <br>> BOGAN <br>> v. SCOTT-HARRIS
, 523 U.S. 44 (1998), 03/03/98 <br>> BOWLES, KEITH <br>> v. RUSSELL, WARDEN , , 06/14/07 <br>> BRIDGE, <br>> JOHN, ET AL. v. PHOENIX BOND & INDEMNITY, ET AL. , , 06/09/08 <br>> CALIFORNIA <br>> DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al. v. MORALES , 514 U.S. 499 (1995), <br>> 04/25/95 <br>> CALIFORNIA <br>> DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT et al. v. DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION, <br>> N. A., INC., et al. , 519 U.S. 316 (1997), 02/18/97 <br>> CARCIERI, GOV. <br>> OF RI, ET AL. v. KEMPTHORNE, SEC. OF INTERIOR , , 02/24/09 <br>> CAREY, <br>> WARDEN v. MUSLADIN, MATHEW , 549 U.S. 70 (2006), 12/11/06 <br>> CARLSBAD <br>> TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. HIF BIO, INC., ET AL. , , 05/04/09 <br>> CARTER, FLOYD <br>> J. v. UNITED STATES , 530 U.S. 255 (2000), 06/12/00 <br>> CASS <br>> COUNTY v. LEECH LAKE BAND OFCHIPPEWA INDIANS , 524 U.S. 103 (1998), <br>> 06/08/98 <br>> CHAVEZ, BEN <br>> v.
MARTINEZ, OLIVERIO , 538 U.S. 760 (2003), 05/27/03 <br>> CHRISTENSEN, <br>> EDWARD, ET AL. v. HARRIS CTY., TX, ET AL. , 529 U.S. 576 (2000), <br>> 05/01/00 <br>> CLINGMAN, SEC., <br>> OK ELECTION BD. v. BEAVER, ANDREA L., ET AL. , 544 U.S. 581 (2005), <br>> 05/23/05 <br>> CONSOLIDATED <br>> RAIL CORPORATION v. GOTTSHALL , 512 U.S. 532 (1994), 06/24/94 <br>> COOPER <br>> INDUSTRIES, INC. v. AVIALL SERVICES, INC. , 543 U.S. 157 (2004), <br>> 12/13/04 <br>> CUELLAR, <br>> HUMBERTO F. R. v. UNITED STATES , , 06/02/08 <br>> CUNNINGHAM, <br>> TERESA v. HAMILTON COUNTY , 527 U.S. 198 (1999), 06/14/99 <br>> DELAWARE v. <br>> NEW YORK , 507 U.S. 490 (1993), 03/30/93 <br>> DEPT. <br>> OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL. v. PUBLIC CITIZEN, ET AL. , 541 U.S. 752 <br>> (2004), 06/07/04 <br>> DESERT <br>> PALACE, INC. v. COSTA, CATHARINA F. , 539 U.S. 90 (2003), 06/09/03 <br>> DIR. <br>>
OF REVENUE OF MO v. CoBANK ACB , 531 U.S. 316 (2001), 02/20/01 <br>> DISTRICT OF <br>> COLUMBIA et al. v. GREATER , 506 U.S. 125 (1992), 12/14/92 <br>> DOOLEY <br>> v. KOREAN AIR LINES CO. , 524 U.S. 116 (1998), 06/08/98 <br>> eBAY <br>> INC., ET AL. v. MERcEXCHANGE, L.L.C. , 547 U.S. 388 (2006), 05/15/06 <br>> EGELHOFF, <br>> DONNA R. v. EGELHOFF, SAMANTHA, ET AL. , 532 U.S. 141 (2001), 03/21/01 <br>> <br>> ENTERGY <br>> LOUISIANA, INC. v. LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERV. COMM. , 539 U.S. 39 (2003), <br>> 06/02/03 <br>> EXXON <br>> CO., U. S. A., et al. v. SOFEC, INC., et al. , 517 U.S. 830 (1996), <br>> 06/10/96 <br>> FARRAR <br>> et al., COADMINISTRATORS OF ESTATE OF FARRAR, DECEASED v. HOBBY , 506 <br>> U.S. 103 (1992), 12/14/92 <br>> FED. <br>> MARITIME COMM'N v. SC STATE PORTS AUTHORITY , 535 U.S. 743 (2002), <br>> 05/28/02 <br>> FEDERAL <br>> COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et
al. v. BEACH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al. <br>> , 508 U.S. 307 (1993), 06/01/93 <br>> FEDERAL <br>> DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. MEYER , 510 U.S. 471 (1994), 02/23/94 <br>> <br>> FELTNER v. <br>> COLUMBIA PICTURES TELEVISION, INC. , 523 U.S. 340 (1998), 03/31/98 <br>> FL <br>> DEPT. OF REVENUE v. PICCADILLY CAFETERIAS, INC. , , 06/16/08 <br>> FLORIDA <br>> v. WHITE, TYVESSEL TYVORUS , 526 U.S. 559 (1999), 05/17/99 <br>> FREIGHTLINER <br>> CORP. et al. v. MYRICK et al. , 514 U.S. 280 (1995), 04/18/95 <br>> GITLITZ, D., <br>> ET UX., ET AL. v. CIR , 531 U.S. 206 (2001), 01/09/01 <br>> GODINEZ, <br>> WARDEN v. MORAN , 509 U.S. 389 (1993), 06/24/93 <br>> GOOD <br>> NEWS CLUB, ET AL. v. MILFORD CENTRAL SCHOOL , 533 U.S. 98 (2001), <br>> 06/11/01 <br>> GRAHAM <br>> COUNTY WATER DISTRICT v. U. S., ex rel. WILSON , 545 U.S. 409 (2005), <br>> 06/20/05 <br>> HARPER <br>>
et al. v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION , 509 U.S. 86 (1993), <br>> 06/18/93 <br>> HARRIS <br>> TRUST & SAVINGS BANK v. SALOMON BROS., INC., ET AL. , 530 U.S. 238 <br>> (2000), 06/12/00 <br>> HOPKINS v. <br>> REEVES , 524 U.S. 88 (1998), 06/08/98 <br>> HOUSEHOLD <br>> CREDIT SERVICES v. PFENNIG, SHARON R. , 541 U.S. 232 (2004), 04/21/04 <br>> HUGHES <br>> AIRCRAFT CO., ET AL. v. JACOBSON, STANLEY, ET AL. , 525 U.S. 432 <br>> (1999), 01/25/99 <br>> HUNT, <br>> GOV. OF NC, ET AL. v. CROMARTIE, MARTIN, ET AL. , 526 U.S. 541 (1999), <br>> 05/17/99 <br>> J.E.M. <br>> AG SUPPLY, ET AL. v. PIONEER HI-BRED INTL. , 534 U.S. 124 (2001), <br>> 12/10/01 <br>> JIMENEZ, <br>> CARLOS v. QUARTERMAN, DIR., TX DOC , , 01/13/09 <br>> JONES, <br>> LOUIS v. UNITED STATES , 527 U.S. 373 (1999), 06/21/99 <br>> KANSAS <br>> v. HENDRICKS , 521 U.S. 346 (1997), 06/23/97 <br>> KANSAS
<br>> v. MARSH, MICHAEL L. , 548 U.S. 163 (2006), 06/26/06 <br>> KNOWLES, <br>> WARDEN v. MIRZAYANCE, ALEXANDRE , , 03/24/09 <br>> LAWRENCE, <br>> GARY v. FLORIDA , 549 U.S. 327 (2007), 02/20/07 <br>> LOCKHEED CORP. <br>> et al. v. SPINK , 517 U.S. 882 (1996), 06/10/96 <br>> MATSUSHITA <br>> ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., et al. v. EPSTEIN , 516 U.S. 367 <br>> (1996), 02/27/96 <br>> MELENDEZ v. <br>> UNITED STATES , 518 U.S. 120 (1996), 06/17/96 <br>> MITCHELL, <br>> GUY, ET AL. v. HELMS, MARY L., ET AL. , 530 U.S. 793 (2000), 06/28/00 <br>> MOYLAN, <br>> ATT'Y GEN. OF GUAM v. CAMACHO, GOV. OF GUAM , 549 U.S. 483 (2007), <br>> 03/27/07 <br>> NAT'L <br>> CABLE & TELECOMM. ASSN. v. BRAND X INTERNET SERVICES , 545 U.S. <br>> 967 (2005), 06/27/05 <br>> NATIONAL <br>> CREDIT UNION ADMIN. v. FIRST NAT.BANK & TRUST CO. , 522 U.S. 479 <br>> (1998), 02/25/98 <br>>
NATIONAL <br>> PRIVATE TRUCK COUNCIL, INC., et al. v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION et al. <br>> , 515 U.S. 582 (1995), 06/19/95 <br>> NATL. <br>> PARK HOSP. ASSN. v. DEPT. OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. , 538 U.S. 803 <br>> (2003), 05/27/03 <br>> NATL. <br>> RR PASSENGER CORP. v. MORGAN, ABNER , 536 U.S. 101 (2002), 06/10/02 <br>> NEBRASKA <br>> DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. LOEWENSTEIN , 513 U.S. 123 (1994), 12/12/94 <br>> NOBELMAN et <br>> ux. v. AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK , 508 U.S. 324 (1993), 06/01/93 <br>> NORFOLK <br>> & WESTERN RAILWAY CO. v. HILES , 516 U.S. 400 (1996), 02/27/96 <br>> NORTHEASTERN <br>> FLORIDA CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA v. CITY <br>> OF JACKSONVILLE, , 508 U.S. 656 (1993), 06/14/93 <br>> Northern Ins. <br>> Co. of New York v. CHATHAM COUNTY, GA , 547 U.S. 189 (2006), 04/25/06 <br>> O'DELL <br>> v. NETHERLAND, WARDEN, et al. , 521 U.S. 151 (1997),
06/19/97 <br>> OLYMPIC <br>> AIRWAYS v. HUSAIN, RUBINA, ETC., ET AL. , 540 U.S. 644 (2004), <br>> 02/24/04 <br>> OREGON <br>> WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OF THE , <br>> 511 U.S. 93 (1994), 04/04/94 <br>> ORFF, <br>> FRANCIS A., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, ET AL. , 545 U.S. 596 (2005), <br>> 06/23/05 <br>> PASQUANTINO, <br>> DAVID B., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES , 544 U.S. 349 (2005), 04/26/05 <br>> PEACOCK v. <br>> THOMAS , 516 U.S. 349 (1996), 02/21/96 <br>> Pennsylvania <br>> Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scott , 524 U.S. 357 (1998), 06/22/98 <br>> PERMANENT <br>> MISSION ETC., ET AL. v. NEW YORK, NY , , 06/14/07 <br>> PIERCE <br>> COUNTY, WA v. GUILLEN, IGNACIO, ET AL. , 537 U.S. 129 (2003), 01/14/03 <br>> <br>> PLILER, <br>> WARDEN v. FORD, RICHARD H. , 542 U.S. 225 (2004), 06/21/04 <br>> POLLARD, <br>> SHARON B. v. E. I. DuPONT de
NEMOURS , 532 U.S. 843 (2001), 06/04/01 <br>> QUANTA <br>> COMPUTER, INC., ET AL. v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. , , 06/09/08 <br>> RAKE et <br>> al. v. WADE, TRUSTEE , 508 U.S. 464 (1993), 06/07/93 <br>> RAYTHEON CO. <br>> v. HERNANDEZ, JOEL , 540 U.S. 44 (2003), 12/02/03 <br>> ROBERTSON, <br>> CHIEF, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, et al. v. SEATTLE AUDUBON SOCIETY <br>> , 503 U.S. 429 (1992), 03/25/92 <br>> ROBINSON v. <br>> SHELL OIL CO. , 519 U.S. 337 (1997), 02/18/97 <br>> ROUSEY, <br>> RICHARD G., ET UX. v. JACOWAY, JILL R. , 544 U.S. 320 (2005), 04/04/05 <br>> <br>> RUBIN, <br>> SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY v. COORS BREWING CO. , 514 U.S. 476 (1995), <br>> 04/19/95 <br>> SCHRIRO, <br>> DIR., AZ DOC v. LANDRIGAN, JEFFREY T. , , 05/14/07 <br>> SHANNON v. <br>> UNITED STATES , 512 U.S. 573 (1994), 06/24/94 <br>> SHAW, <br>> ROBERT, ET AL. v. MURPHY, KEVIN , 532 U.S. 223 (2001),
04/18/01 <br>> SIMS, <br>> JUATASSA v. APFEL, COMM'R, SOCIAL SEC. , 530 U.S. 103 (2000), 06/05/00 <br>> <br>> SMTIH, <br>> WARDEN v. ROBBINS, LEE , 528 U.S. 259 (2000), 01/19/00 <br>> SOUTH <br>> DAKOTA v. BOURLAND, individually and as chairman of the CHEYENNE RIVER <br>> SIOUX TRIBE, et al. , 508 U.S. 679 (1993), 06/14/93 <br>> SPRINT/UNITED <br>> MANAGEMENT CO. v. MENDELSOHN, ELLEN , , 02/26/08 <br>> STAPLES v. <br>> UNITED STATES , 511 U.S. 600 (1994), 05/23/94 <br>> STEWART, <br>> WILLARD v. DUTRA CONST. CO. , 543 U.S. 481 (2005), 02/22/05 <br>> SWIERKIEWICZ, <br>> AKOS v. SOREMA N.A. , 534 U.S. 506 (2002), 02/26/02 <br>> TAYLOR <br>> v. FREELAND & KRONZ et al. , 503 U.S. 638 (1992), 04/21/92 <br>> TEXACO, <br>> INC. v. DAGHER, FOUAD N., ET AL. , 547 U.S. 1 (2006), 02/28/06 <br>> THINGS <br>> REMEMBERED, INC. v. PETRARCA , 516 U.S. 124 (1995), 12/05/95 <br>>
TYLER, <br>> MELVIN v. CAIN, WARDEN , 533 U.S. 656 (2001), 06/28/01 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. GALLETTI , 541 U.S. 114 (2004), 03/23/04 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. PATANE, SAMUEL F. , 542 U.S. 630 (2004), 06/28/04 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. LaBONTE et al. , 520 U.S. 751 (1997), 05/27/97 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. SALERNO et al. , 505 U.S. 317 (1992), 06/19/92 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. OAKLAND CANNABIS, ET AL. , 532 U.S. 483 (2001), 05/14/01 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. ATLANTIC RESEARCH CORP. , , 06/11/07 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. WILSON , 503 U.S. 329 (1992), 03/24/92 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. BAJAKAJIAN , 524 U.S. 321 (1998), 06/22/98 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. MEZZANATTO , 513 U.S. 196 (1995), 01/18/95 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP. , 517 U.S. 843 (1996), <br>> 06/10/96 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. ALVAREZ
SANCHEZ , 511 U.S. 350 (1994), 05/02/94 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. RODRIGUEZ-MORENO, JACINTO , 526 U.S. 275 (1999), 03/30/99 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. SCHEFFER , 523 U.S. 303 (1998), 03/31/98 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES DEPT. OF DEFENSE v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS , 510 U.S. 487 <br>> (1994), 02/23/94 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES, ET AL. v. BEAN, THOMAS L. , 537 U.S. 71 (2002), 12/10/02 <br>> UNITHERM FOOD <br>> SYS., INC. v. SWIFT-ECKRICH, INC., ET AL. , 546 U.S. 394 (2006), <br>> 01/23/06 <br>> WADDINGTON, <br>> SUPT., WA v. SARAUSAD, CESAR , , 01/21/09 <br>> WAGNON, <br>> SECRETARY, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. PRAIRIE BAND POTAWATOMI NATION <br>> , 546 U.S. 95 (2005), 12/06/05 <br>> WARNER <br>> JENKINSON CO., INC. v. HILTON DAVIS CHEMICAL CO. , 520 U.S. 17 (1997), <br>> 03/03/97 <br>> WASHINGTON v. <br>> RECUENCO, ARTURO R. , 548 U.S. 212 (2006), 06/26/06 <br>>
WASHINGTON <br>> STATE GRANGE v. WA REPUBLICAN PARTY, ET AL. , , 03/18/08 <br>> WEYERHAEUSER <br>> CO. v. ROSS-SIMMONS HARDWOOD LUMBER CO. , 549 U.S. 312 (2007), <br>> 02/20/07 <br>> WILSON <br>> v. ARKANSAS , 514 U.S. 927 (1995), 05/22/95 <br>> WOODFORD, <br>> WARDEN v. GARCEAU, ROBERT F. , 538 U.S. 202 (2003), 03/25/03 <br>> WRIGHT, <br>> WARDEN, et al. v. WEST , 505 U.S. 277 (1992), 06/19/92 <br>> YOUNG <br>> et al. v. HARPER , 520 U.S. 143 (1997), 03/18/97 <br>> Concurrences<br>> 44 <br>> LIQUORMART, INC., et al. v. RHODE ISLAND et al. , 517 U.S. 484 (1996), <br>> 05/13/96 <br>> ADARAND <br>> CONSTRUCTORS, INC. v. PENA, SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION, et al. , 515 <br>> U.S. 200 (1995), 06/12/95 <br>> ALBERTSONS, <br>> INC. v. KIRKINGBURG, HALLIE , 527 U.S. 555 (1999), 06/22/99 <br>> AM. <br>> TRUCKING ASSNS., ET AL. v. MI PUB. SERV. COMM'N, ET AL. , 06/20/05 <br>>
APPRENDI, <br>> CHARLES C. v. NEW JERSEY , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), 06/26/00 <br>> ASHCROFT, <br>> ATTY. GEN., ET AL. v. FREE SPEECH COALITION , 535 U.S. 234 (2002), <br>> 04/16/02 <br>> BANK <br>> OF AMERICA NAT. TRUST AND SAV. ASSN. v.203 NORTH LASALLE STREET <br>> PARTNERSHIP v. , 526 U.S. 434 (1999), 05/03/99 <br>> BARTLETT, <br>> GARY, ET AL. v. STRICKLAND, DWIGHT, ET AL. , , 03/09/09 <br>> BAZE, <br>> RALPH, ET AL. v. REES, COMM'R, KY DOC, ET AL. , , 04/16/08 <br>> BEARD, <br>> SEC., PA DOC v. BANKS, RONALD , 548 U.S. 521 (2006), 06/28/06 <br>> BEDROC <br>> LTD., LLC, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, ET AL. , 541 U.S. 176 (2004), <br>> 03/31/04 <br>> BENNIS <br>> v. MICHIGAN , 517 U.S. 1163 (1996), 03/04/96 <br>> BROWNER, EPA <br>> ADMINR. v. AM. TRUCKING ASSNS., ET AL. , , 02/27/01 <br>> BUCKLEY, SEC. <br>> OF ST. OF CO v. AM. CONST. LAW FNDN., ET AL. , 525 U.S. 182 (1999), <br>> 01/12/99 <br>> BUSH, <br>> GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, et al. v. VERA et al. , 517 U.S. 952 (1996), <br>> 06/13/96 <br>> CAPITOL <br>> SQUARE REVIEW AND ADVISORY BOARD et al. v. PINETTE et al. , 515 U.S. <br>> 753 (1995), 06/29/95 <br>> CHRISTOPHER, <br>> WARREN, ET AL. v. HARBURY, JENNIFER K. , 536 U.S. 403 (2002), 06/20/02 <br>> <br>> COMMISSIONER <br>> OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SOLIMAN , 506 U.S. 168 (1993), 01/12/93 <br>> CONCRETE PIPE <br>> & PRODUCTS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. v. CONSTRUCTION LABORERS PENSION TRUST <br>> FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA , 508 U.S. 602 (1993), 06/14/93 <br>> COOK, <br>> REBECCA M. v. GRALIKE, DON , 531 U.S. 510 (2001), 02/28/01 <br>> COOPER <br>> INDUSTRIES, INC. v. LEATHERMAN TOOL GROUP, INC. , 532 U.S. 424 (2001), <br>> 05/14/01 <br>> CUTTER, JON <br>> B., ET AL. v. WILKINSON, DIR., OH DOC, ET AL. , 544 U.S. 709 (2005), <br>> 05/31/05 <br>> DEPT.
<br>> OF REVENUE OF KY, ET AL. v. DAVIS, GEORGE W., ET UX. , , 05/19/08 <br>> EASTERN <br>> ENTERPRISES v. APFEL , 524 U.S. 498 (1998), 06/25/98 <br>> EDELMAN, <br>> LEONARD v. LYNCHBURG COLLEGE , 535 U.S. 106 (2002), 03/19/02 <br>> ELK <br>> GROVE UNIFIED SCH. DIST. v. NEWDOW, MICHAEL A., ET AL. , 542 U.S. 1 <br>> (2004), 06/14/04 <br>> ENVIRONMENTAL <br>> DEFENSE, ET AL. v. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION , 549 U.S. 561 (2007), <br>> 04/02/07 <br>> FARMER v. <br>> BRENNAN, WARDEN, et al. , 511 U.S. 825 (1994), 06/06/94 <br>> FCC, ET <br>> AL. v. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, ET AL. , , 04/28/09 <br>> FOGERTY v. <br>> FANTASY, INC. , 510 U.S. 517 (1994), 03/01/94 <br>> GEORGIA v. <br>> McCOLLUM et al. , 505 U.S. 42 (1992), 06/18/92 <br>> GEORGIA v. <br>> ASHCROFT, ATT'Y GEN., ET AL. , 539 U.S. 461 (2003), 06/26/03 <br>> GONZALES, <br>> ATT'Y GEN. v. CARHART, LEROY, ET AL. , ,
04/18/07 <br>> GRABLE <br>> & SONS METAL PRODUCTS v. DARUE ENGINEERING , 545 U.S. 308 (2005), <br>> 06/13/05 <br>> GRAHAM <br>> v. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL <br>> DIVISION , 506 U.S. 461 (1993), 01/25/93 <br>> GRATZ, <br>> JENNIFER, ET AL. v. BOLLINGER, LEE, ET AL. , 539 U.S. 244 (2003), <br>> 06/23/03 <br>> GREATER NEW <br>> ORLEANS BROADC. v. UNITED STATES, ET AL. , 527 U.S. 173 (1999), <br>> 06/14/99 <br>> HARBISON, <br>> EDWARD J. v. BELL, WARDEN , , 04/01/09 <br>> HECK <br>> v. HUMPHREY et al. , 512 U.S. 477 (1994), 06/24/94 <br>> HOLDER, <br>> individually and in his official capacity as COUNTY COMMISSIONER FOR BLE <br>> v. HALL et al. , 512 U.S. 874 (1994), 06/30/94 <br>> HOWSAM, <br>> KAREN, ETC. v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS , 537 U.S. 79 (2002), 12/10/02 <br>> IRIZARRY, <br>> RICHARD v. UNITED STATES , , 06/12/08 <br>> JEROME <br>> B. GRUBART, INC. v. GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CO. et al. , 513 <br>> U.S. 527 (1995), 02/22/95 <br>> JOHANNS, SEC. <br>> OF AGRIC., ET AL. v. LIVESTOCK MARKETING, ET AL. , 544 U.S. 550 <br>> (2005), 05/23/05 <br>> JOHNSON v. <br>> TEXAS , 509 U.S. 350 (1993), 06/24/93 <br>> JOHNSON, <br>> CORNELL v. UNITED STATES , 529 U.S. 694 (2000), 05/15/00 <br>> JONES, DEWEY <br>> J. v. UNITED STATES , 529 U.S. 848 (2000), 05/22/00 <br>> KANSAS <br>> v. COLORADO , , 12/07/04 <br>> KOONS <br>> BUICK PONTIAC GMC v. NIGH, BRADLEY , 543 U.S. 50 (2004), 11/30/04 <br>> KOWALSKI, <br>> JUDGE, ETC., ET AL. v. TESMER, JOHN C., ET AL. , 543 U.S. 125 (2004), <br>> 12/13/04 <br>> LaRUE, <br>> JAMES v. DeWOLFF, BOBERG & ASSOC., INC. , , 02/20/08 <br>> LEWIS, <br>> DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. v. CASEY et al. , <br>> 516 U.S. 804 (1996), 06/24/96
<br>> LILLY, <br>> BENJAMIN L. v. VIRGINIA , 527 U.S. 116 (1999), 06/10/99 <br>> LOCKHART, <br>> DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION v. FRETWELL , 506 U.S. 364 <br>> (1993), 01/25/93 <br>> LORILLARD <br>> TOBACCO CO., ET AL v. REILLY, ATTY. GEN. OF MA , , 06/28/01 <br>> LOVING v. <br>> UNITED STATES , 517 U.S. 748 (1996), 06/03/96 <br>> LYNCE <br>> v. MATHIS, SUPERINTENDENT, TOMOKA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, et al. , <br>> 519 U.S. 433 (1997), 02/19/97 <br>> McINTYRE, <br>> executor of ESTATE OF McINTYRE, DECEASED v. OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION <br>> , 514 U.S. 334 (1995), 04/19/95 <br>> MEADWESTVACO <br>> CORP. v. IL DEPT. OF REVENUE, ET AL. , , 04/15/08 <br>> MISSOURI et <br>> al. v. JENKINS et al. , 515 U.S. 70 (1995), 06/12/95 <br>> MITCHELL, <br>> WARDEN v. STUMPF, JOHN D. , 545 U.S. 175 (2005), 06/13/05 <br>> MORSE, <br>> DEBORAH, ET AL. v. FREDERICK, JOSEPH ,
, 06/25/07 <br>> NORDLINGER v. <br>> HAHN, IN HIS CAPACITY AS TAX ASSESSOR FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY, et al. , <br>> 505 U.S. 1 (1992), 06/18/92 <br>> ONCALE <br>> v. SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE SERVICES, INC. , 523 U.S. 75 (1998), 03/04/98 <br>> OVERTON, DIR., <br>> MI DOC v. BAZZETTA, MICHELLE, ET AL. , 539 U.S. 126 (2003), 06/16/03 <br>> PARENTS <br>> INVOLVED IN COMM. SCHS. v. SEATTLE SCH. DIST. NO. 1 , , 06/28/07 <br>> PHARMACEUTICAL <br>> RESEARCH v. WALSH , 538 U.S. 644 (2003), 05/19/03 <br>> POSTAL <br>> SERVICE v. GREGORY, MARIA A. , 534 U.S. 1 (2001), 11/13/01 <br>> PRINTZ, <br>> SHERIFF/CORONER, RAVALLI COUNTY, MONTANA v. UNITED STATES , 521 U.S. <br>> 898 (1997), 06/27/97 <br>> RANDALL, <br>> NEIL, ET AL. v. SORRELL, WILLIAM H., ET AL. , 548 U.S. 230 (2006), <br>> 06/26/06 <br>> RAYMOND B. <br>> YATES, M.D., ETC. v. HENTON, WILLIAM T. , 541 U.S. 1 (2004), 03/02/04 <br>> RENO,
<br>> ATTORNEY GENERAL v. BOSSIER PARISH SCHOOL BOARD et al. , 520 U.S. 471 <br>> (1997), 05/12/97 <br>> RENO, <br>> ATTORNEY GENERAL v. BOSSIER PARISH SCH. BD. , , 01/24/00 <br>> REPUBLIC <br>> NAT'L BANK OF MIAMI v. UNITED STATES , 506 U.S. 80 (1992), 12/14/92 <br>> RICHMOND v. <br>> LEWIS, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA , 506 U.S. 56 (1992), 12/01/92 <br>> ROSENBERGER <br>> et al. v. RECTOR AND VISITORS OF UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA et al. , 515 <br>> U.S. 819 (1995), 06/29/95 <br>> SABRI, <br>> BASIM O. v. UNITED STATES , 541 U.S. 600 (2004), 05/17/04 <br>> SAFECO <br>> INS. CO., ET AL. v. BURR, CHARLES, ET AL. , , 06/04/07 <br>> SELING, <br>> SUPT., SPECIAL CC v. YOUNG, ANDRE BRIGHAM , 531 U.S. 250 (2001), <br>> 01/17/01 <br>> SHEPARD, <br>> REGINALD v. UNITED STATES , 544 U.S. 13 (2005), 03/07/05 <br>> SMITH, <br>> ET AL. v. DOE, ET AL. , 538 U.S. 84 (2003), 03/05/03 <br>> SOUTH
<br>> CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. ALABAMA , 526 U.S. 160 (1999), 03/23/99 <br>> THOMPSON, SEC. <br>> OF H&HS v. WESTERN STATES MEDICAL CENT. , 535 U. S. 357 (2002), <br>> 04/29/02 <br>> TILL, <br>> LEE M., ET UX. v. SCS CREDIT CORP. , 541 U.S. 465 (2004), 05/17/04 <br>> TN <br>> SECD'Y SCH. ATHL. ASSN. v. BRENTWOOD ACADEMY , , 06/21/07 <br>> TROXEL, <br>> JENIFER, ET VIR v. GRANVILLE, TOMMIE , 530 U.S. 57 (2000), 06/05/00 <br>> TWO <br>> PESOS, INC. v. TACO CABANA, INC. , 505 U.S. 763 (1992), 06/26/92 <br>> UNITED <br>> DOMINION INDUSTRIES v. UNITED STATES , 532 U.S. 822 (2001), 06/04/01 <br>> UNITED <br>> HAULERS ASSN., INC. v. ONEIDA-HERKIMER SOLID WASTE , , 04/30/07 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. FORDICE, GOVERNOR OF MISSISSIPPI, et al. , 505 U.S. 717 <br>> (1992), 06/26/92 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. RESSAM, AHMED , , 05/19/08 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. RUIZ,
ANGELA , 536 U.S. 622 (2002), 06/24/02 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. HUBBELL, WEBSTER L. , 530 U.S. 27 (2000), 06/05/00 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. MORRISON, ANTONIO J., ET AL. , , 05/15/00 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. LARA, BILLY JO , 541 U.S. 193 (2004), 04/19/04 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. R. L. C. , 503 U.S. 291 (1992), 03/24/92 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. LOPEZ , 514 U.S. 549 (1995), 04/26/95 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES, ET AL. v. UNITED FOODS, INC. , 533 U.S. 405 (2001), 06/25/01 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES, ET AL. v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP , 529 U.S. 803 (2000), <br>> 05/22/00 <br>> VAN <br>> ORDEN, THOMAS v. PERRY, GOV. OF TX, ET AL. , 545 U.S. 677 (2005), <br>> 06/27/05 <br>> WEST <br>> COVINA v. PERKINS , 525 U.S. 234 (1999), 01/13/99 <br>> WILKIE <br>> v. ROBBINS , , 06/25/07 <br>> WYETH <br>> v. LEVINE, DIANA , , 03/04/09 <br>> ZELMAN, <br>>
SUPT. OF PUB. INSTR. v. SIMMONS-HARRIS, DORIS, ET AL , 536 U.S. 639 <br>> (2002), 06/27/02 <br>> Dissents<br>> OLMSTEAD, <br>> COMMR., GA HUMAN vs. L. C., ETC. ET AL., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), 06/22/99 <br>> <br>> ALLIED BRUCE <br>> TERMINIX COS., INC., et al. v. DOBSON et al. , 513 U.S. 265 (1995), <br>> 01/18/95 <br>> ALTRIA <br>> GROUP, INC., ET AL. v. GOOD, STEPHANIE, ET AL. , , 12/15/08 <br>> ANDERSON, <br>> ELOISE, ET AL. v. ROE, BRENDA, ET AL. , 526 U.S. 489 (1999), 05/17/99 <br>> ARCHER, A. <br>> ELLIOTT, ET UX. v. WARNER, ARLENE L. , 538 U.S. 314 (2003), 03/31/03 <br>> BARNHART, <br>> COMM'R, SSA v. PEABODY COAL CO., ET AL. , 537 U.S. 149 (2003), <br>> 01/15/03 <br>> BOEING <br>> CO., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES , 537 U.S. 437 (2003), 03/04/03 <br>> BRENTWOOD <br>> ACADEMY v. TN SECONDARY SCH., ET AL. , 531 U.S. 288 (2001), 02/20/01 <br>> BUCKEYE CHECK <br>> CASHING,
INC. v. CARDEGNA, JOHN, ET AL. , 546 U.S. 440 (2006), <br>> 02/21/06 <br>> BURLINGTON <br>> INDUSTRIES, INC. v. ELLERTH , 524 U.S. 742 (1998), 06/26/98 <br>> CAMPS <br>> NEWFOUND/OWATONNA, INC. v. TOWN OF HARRISON et al. , 520 U.S. 564 <br>> (1997), 05/19/97 <br>> CARON <br>> v. UNITED STATES , 524 U.S. 308 (1998), 06/22/98 <br>> CBOCS <br>> WEST, INC. v. HUMPHRIES, HEDRICK G. , , 05/27/08 <br>> CEDAR <br>> RAPIDS COM. SCH. DIST. v. GARRET F., A MINOR, ETC. , 526 U.S. 66 <br>> (1999), 03/03/99 <br>> CENTRAL <br>> VIRGINIA COMM. COLLEGE v. KATZ, BERNARD , 546 U.S. 356 (2006), <br>> 01/23/06 <br>> CHICAGO v. <br>> MORALES , 527 U.S. 41 (1999), 06/10/99 <br>> CITY OF <br>> EDMONDS v. OXFORD HOUSE, INC., et al. , 514 U.S. 725 (1995), 05/15/95 <br>> COMMISSIONER <br>> OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LUNDY , 516 U.S. 235 (1996), 01/17/96 <br>> CONE, <br>> GARY B. v. BELL, WARDEN ,
, 04/28/09 <br>> CRAWFORD, INT. <br>> FIELD OFFICE DIR. v. MARTINEZ, SERGIO S. , 543 U.S. 371 (2005), <br>> 01/12/05 <br>> CREDIT <br>> SUISSE FIRST BOSTON LTD. v. BILLING, GLEN, ET AL. , , 06/18/07 <br>> DECK, <br>> CARMAN v. MISSOURI , 544 U.S. 622 (2005), 05/23/05 <br>> DOCTOR'S <br>> ASSOCIATES, INC., et al. v. CASAROTTO et ux. , 517 U.S. 681 (1996), <br>> 05/20/96 <br>> DOGGETT v. <br>> UNITED STATES , 505 U.S. 647 (1992), 00/00/00 <br>> DOLAN, <br>> BARBARA v. USPS, ET AL. , 546 U.S. 481 (2006), 02/22/06 <br>> EEOC <br>> v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. , 534 U.S. 279 (2002), 01/15/02 <br>> ERICKSON v. <br>> PARDUS , , 06/04/07 <br>> EVANS <br>> v. UNITED STATES , 504 U.S. 255 (1992), 05/26/92 <br>> FARAGHER v. <br>> CITY OF BOCA RATON , 524 U.S. 775 (1998), 06/26/98 <br>> FEC v. <br>> BEAUMONT, CHRISTINE, ET AL. , 539 U.S. 146 (2003), 06/16/03 <br>> FEC v. <br>> CO REPUBLICAN FED. CAMPAIGN , 533 U.S. 431 (2001), 06/25/01 <br>> FEDERAL <br>> EXPRESS CORP. v. HOLOWECKI, PAUL, ET AL. , , 02/27/08 <br>> FISCHER, <br>> JEFFREY A. v. UNITED STATES , 529 U.S. 667 (2000), 05/15/00 <br>> FOUCHA v. <br>> LOUISIANA , 504 U.S. 71 (1992), 05/18/92 <br>> GALL, <br>> BRIAN M. v. UNITED STATES , , 12/10/07 <br>> GARLOTTE v. <br>> FORDICE, GOVERNOR OF MISSISSIPPI , 515 U.S. 39 (1995), 05/30/95 <br>> GEN. <br>> DYNAMICS LAND SYS. v. CLINE, DENNIS, ET AL. , 540 U.S. 581 (2004), <br>> 02/24/04 <br>> GEORGIA v. <br>> RANDOLPH, SCOTT F. , 547 U.S. 103 (2006), 03/22/06 <br>> GLICKMAN, <br>> SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE v. WILEMAN BROTHERS & ELLIOTT, INC., et al. <br>> , 521 U.S. 457 (1997), 06/25/97 <br>> GLOBAL <br>> CROSSING, INC. v. METROPHONES, INC. , , 04/17/07 <br>> GOMEZ-PEREZ, <br>> MYRNA v. POTTER, POSTMASTER GEN. , , 05/27/08 <br>>
GONZALES, <br>> ATT'Y GEN., ET AL. v. OREGON, ET AL. , 546 U.S. 243 (2006), 01/17/06 <br>> GONZALES, <br>> ATT\'Y GEN., ET AL. v. RAICH, ANGEL M., ET AL. , 545 U.S. 1 (2005), <br>> 06/06/05 <br>> GONZALEZ, <br>> HOMERO v. UNITED STATES , , 05/12/08 <br>> GRANHOLM, <br>> GOV. OF MI, ET AL. v. HEALD, ELEANOR, ET AL. , 544 U.S. 460 (2005), <br>> 05/16/05 <br>> GREEN <br>> TREE FINANCIAL CORP. v. BAZZLE, LYNN W., ET AL. , 539 U.S. 444 (2003), <br>> 06/23/03 <br>> GROH, <br>> JEFF v. RAMIREZ, JOSEPH R., ET AL. , 540 U.S. 551 (2004), 02/24/04 <br>> GUSTAFSON et <br>> al. v. ALLOYD CO., INC., fka ALLOYD HOLDINGS, INC., et al. , 513 U.S. <br>> 561 (1995), 02/28/95 <br>> HALBERT, <br>> ANTONIO D. v. MICHIGAN , 545 U.S. 605 (2005), 06/23/05 <br>> HAMDAN, SALIM <br>> A. v. RUMSFELD, SEC. OF DEFENSE , 548 U.S. 557 (2006), 06/29/06 <br>> HAMDI, YASER <br>> E. ET AL. v. RUMSFELD, SEC.
OF DEFENSE , 542 U.S. 507 (2004), 06/28/04 <br>> <br>> HARRIS, <br>> WILLIAM J. v. UNITED STATES , 536 U.S. 545 (2002), 06/24/02 <br>> HAYWOOD, <br>> KEITH v. DROWN, CURTIS, ET AL. , , 05/26/09 <br>> HELLING et <br>> al. v. McKINNEY , 509 U.S. 25 (1993), 06/18/93 <br>> HENDERSON v. <br>> UNITED STATES , 517 U.S. 654 (1996), 05/20/96 <br>> HOLLOWAY, <br>> FRANCOIS v. UNITED STATES , 526 U.S. 1 (1999), 03/02/99 <br>> HOPE, <br>> LARRY v. PELZER, MARK, ET AL. , 536 U.S. 730 (2002), 06/27/02 <br>> HUNT, <br>> GOV. OF NC, ET AL. v. CROMARTIE, MARTIN, ET AL. , , 04/18/01 <br>> INDIANAPOLIS, <br>> IN, ET AL. v. EDMOND, JAMES, ET AL. , 531 U.S. 32 (2000), 11/28/00 <br>> JACKSON, <br>> RODERICK v. BIRMINGHAM BD. OF EDUCATION , 544 U.S. 167 (2005), <br>> 03/29/05 <br>> JAMES, <br>> ALPHONSO v. UNITED STATES , , 04/18/07 <br>> JOHN <br>> HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. v.
HARRIS TRUST & SAVINGS BANK, as <br>> , 510 U.S. 86 (1993), 12/13/93 <br>> JOHNSON <br>> v. De GRANDY , 512 U.S. 997 (1994), 06/30/94 <br>> JOHNSON, <br>> GARRISON S. v. CALIFORNIA, ET AL. , 543 U.S. 499 (2005), 02/23/05 <br>> JONES, <br>> GARY K. v. FLOWERS, LINDA K., ET AL. , 547 U.S. 220 (2006), 04/26/06 <br>> KELLY, <br>> WILLIAM A. v. SOUTH CAROLINA , 534 U.S. 246 (2002), 01/09/02 <br>> KELO, <br>> SUSETTE, ET AL. v. NEW LONDON, CT, ET AL. , 545 U.S. 469 (2005), <br>> 06/23/05 <br>> KIMBROUGH, <br>> DERRICK v. UNITED STATES , , 12/10/07 <br>> LAWRENCE, <br>> JOHN G., ET AL. v. TEXAS , 539 U.S. 558 (2003), 06/26/03 <br>> LOCKE, GOV. <br>> OF WA, ET AL. v. DAVEY, JOSHUA , 540 U.S. 712 (2004), 02/25/04 <br>> LOPEZ <br>> v. MONTEREY COUNTY , 525 U.S. 266 (1999), 01/20/99 <br>> LOPEZ, <br>> JOSE A. v. GONZALES, ATT'Y GEN. , 549 U.S. 47 (2006), 12/05/06 <br>> M. L.
<br>> B. v. S. L. J., individually and as next friend of the minor children, S. <br>> L. J. and M. , 519 U.S. 102 (1996), 12/16/96 <br>> MASTROBUONO et <br>> al. v. SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC., et al. , 514 U.S. 52 (1995), <br>> 03/06/95 <br>> McFARLAND v. <br>> SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL <br>> DIVISION , 512 U.S. 849 (1994), 06/30/94 <br>> MEdIMMUNE, <br>> INC. v. GENENTECH, INC., ET AL. , 549 U.S. 118 (2007), 01/09/07 <br>> MILLER-EL, <br>> THOMAS J. v. COCKRELL, DIR. TX DCJ , 537 U.S. 322 (2003), 02/25/03 <br>> MILLER-EL, <br>> THOMAS J. v. DRETKE, DIR., TX DCJ , 544 U.S. 660 (2005), 06/13/05 <br>> MINNESOTA, <br>> ET AL. v. MILLE LACS BAND, ETC., ET AL , 526 U.S. 172 (1999), 03/24/99 <br>> <br>> MITCHELL, <br>> AMANDA v. UNITED STATES , 526 U.S. 314 (1999), 04/05/99 <br>> MORSE <br>> et al. v. REPUBLICAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA et al. , 517
U.S. 186 (1996), <br>> 03/27/96 <br>> MUSICK, <br>> PEELER & GARRETT et al. v. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU et al. , <br>> 508 U.S. 286 (1993), 06/01/93 <br>> NASA, <br>> ET AL. v. FED. LABOR REL. AUTH., ET AL , 527 U.S. 229 (1999), 06/17/99 <br>> <br>> NEGUSIE, <br>> DANIEL G. v. MUKASEY, ATT'Y GEN. , , 03/03/09 <br>> NIXON, <br>> MO ATTY. GEN., ET AL. v. SHRINK MO GOVT. PAC, ET AL. , 528 U.S. 377 <br>> (2000), 01/24/00 <br>> NORTHWEST <br>> AIRLINES, INC., et al. v. COUNTY OF KENT, MICHIGAN, et al. , 510 U.S. <br>> 355 (1994), 01/24/94 <br>> O'NEAL <br>> v. McANINCH, WARDEN , 513 U.S. 432 (1995), 02/21/95 <br>> OUBRE <br>> v. ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. , 522 U.S. 422 (1998), 01/26/98 <br>> PA STATE <br>> POLICE v. SUDERS, NANCY D. , 542 U.S. 129 (2004), 06/14/04 <br>> PANETTI, <br>> SCOTT L. v. QUATERMAN, DIR., TX DCJ , , 06/28/07 <br>> PHILIP <br>> MORRIS
USA v. WILLIAMS, MAYOLA , 549 U.S. 346 (2007), 02/20/07 <br>> POWELL <br>> v. NEVADA , 511 U.S. 79 (1994), 03/30/94 <br>> PRESTON, <br>> ARNOLD M. v. FERRER, ALEX E. , , 02/20/08 <br>> PUD <br>> NO. 1 OF JEFFERSON COUNTY et al. v. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY et <br>> al. , 511 U.S. 700 (1994), 05/31/94 <br>> RIGGINS v. <br>> NEVADA , 504 U.S. 127 (1992), 05/18/92 <br>> ROELL, <br>> JOSEPH C., ET AL. v. WITHROW, JON MICHAEL , 538 U.S. 580 (2003), <br>> 04/29/03 <br>> ROTHGERY, <br>> WALTER A. v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TX , , 06/23/08 <br>> ROWLAND, <br>> FORMER DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. v. <br>> CALIFORNIA MEN'S COLONY, UNIT II MEN'S , 506 U.S. 194 (1993), 01/12/93 <br>> <br>> RUSH <br>> PRUDENTIAL HMO, INC. v. MORAN, DEBRA, ET AL. , 536 U.S. 355 (2002), <br>> 06/20/02 <br>> SCARBOROUGH, <br>> RANDALL C. v. PRINCIPI, SEC VETERANS AFFAIRS , 541
U.S. 401 (2004), <br>> 05/03/04 <br>> SECURITY <br>> SERVICES, INC. v. KMART CORP. , 511 U.S. 222 (1994), 05/16/94 <br>> SHAFER, <br>> WESLEY A. v. SOUTH CAROLINA , 532 U.S. 36 (2001), 03/20/01 <br>> SHALALA, <br>> SEC. OF H&HS, ET AL v. IL COUNCIL, LONG TERM CARE , 529 U.S. 1 <br>> (2000), 02/29/00 <br>> SMALL, <br>> GARY S. v. UNITED STATES , 544 U.S. 385 (2005), 04/26/05 <br>> SNYDER, ALLEN <br>> v. LOUISIANA , , 03/19/08 <br>> STATE <br>> FARM MUTUAL AUTO. v. CAMPBELL, CURTIS, ET UX. , 538 U.S. 408 (2003), <br>> 04/07/03 <br>> STENBERG, NE <br>> ATTY. GEN. v. CARHART, LEROY , 530 U.S. 914 (2000), 06/28/00 <br>> STEWART v. <br>> MARTINEZ-VILLAREAL , 523 U.S. 637 (1998), 05/18/98 <br>> TAHOE-SIERRA <br>> PRESERVATION v. TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING , 535 U. S. 302 (2002), <br>> 04/23/02 <br>> TENNARD, <br>> ROBERT J. v. DRETKE, DIR., TX DCJ , 542 U.S. 274 (2004),
06/24/04 <br>> TENNESSEE v. <br>> LANE, GEORGE, ET AL. , 541 U.S. 509 (2004), 05/17/04 <br>> THOMAS <br>> JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY, dba THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL v. SHALALA, <br>> SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES , 512 U.S. 504 (1994), 06/24/94 <br>> <br>> THOMPSON v. <br>> KEOHANE, WARDEN, et al. , 516 U.S. 99 (1996)., 11/29/95 <br>> TN <br>> STUDENT ASSISTANCE CORP. v. HOOD, PAMELA L. , 541 U.S. 440 (2004), <br>> 05/17/04 <br>> TORY, <br>> ULYSSES, ET AL. v. COCHRAN, JOHNNIE L. , 544 U.S. 734 (2005), 05/31/05 <br>> <br>> U. S. <br>> TERM LIMITS, INC., et al. v. THORNTON et al. , 514 U.S. 779 (1995), <br>> 05/22/95 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. CRAFT, SANDRA L. , 535 U.S. 274 (2002), 04/17/02 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. BOOKER, FREDDIE J. , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), 01/12/05 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE , 537 U.S. 465 (2003), 03/04/03
<br>> VARITY <br>> CORP. v. HOWE et al. , 516 U.S. 489 (1996), 03/19/96 <br>> VIRGINIA v. <br>> BLACK, BARRY E., ET AL. , 538 U.S. 343 (2003), 04/07/03 <br>> Concur in part, dissent in part<br>> ANZA, <br>> JOSEPH, ET AL. v. IDEAL STEEL SUPPLY CORP. , 547 U.S. 451 (2006), <br>> 06/05/06 <br>> AT&T <br>> CORP. v. IOWA UTILITIES BD. , , 01/25/99 <br>> BANKS, <br>> DELMA, JR. v. DRETKE, DIR., TX DCJ , 540 U.S. 668 (2004), 02/24/04 <br>> BATES, <br>> DENNIS, ET AL. v. DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC , 544 U.S. 431 (2005), 04/27/05 <br>> <br>> CAMPBELL v. <br>> LOUISIANA , 523 U.S. 392 (1998), 04/21/98 <br>> CHENEY, <br>> VICE PRESIDENT OF U.S. v. USDC DC , 542 U.S. 367 (2004), 06/24/04 <br>> COLORADO <br>> REPUBLICAN FEDERAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE et al. v. FEDERAL ELECTION <br>> COMMISSION , 518 U.S. 604 (1996), 06/26/96 <br>> CSX <br>> TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. EASTERWOOD , 507
U.S. 658 (1993), 04/21/93 <br>> DAVIS, <br>> ADRIAN M. v. WASHINGTON , 547 U.S. 813 (2006), 06/19/06 <br>> DENVER <br>> AREA EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSORTIUM, INC., et al. v. FEDERAL <br>> COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al. , 518 U.S. 727 (1996), 06/28/96 <br>> GRUTTER, <br>> BARBARA v. BOLLINGER, LEE, ET AL. , 539 U.S. 306 (2003), 06/23/03 <br>> HILLSIDE <br>> DAIRY, ET AL. v. LYONS, SEC., FOOD AND AGRIC. , 539 U.S. 59 (2003), <br>> 06/09/03 <br>> HOLDER, <br>> individually and in his official capacity as COUNTY COMMISSIONER FOR BLE <br>> v. HALL et al. , 512 U.S. 874 (1994), 06/30/94 <br>> KIMEL, <br>> J. DANIEL, ET AL. v. FL BOARD OF REGENTS, ET AL. , , 01/11/00 <br>> McCONNELL, <br>> SENATOR, ET AL. v. FEC, ET AL. , 540 U.S. 93 (2003), 12/10/03 <br>> MEACHAM, <br>> CLIFFORD B., ET AL. v. KNOLLS ATOMIC POWER LAB., ET AL. , , 06/19/08 <br>> NATL. <br>> CABLE TV ASSN.,
INC. v. GULF POWER CO., ET AL. , 534 U.S. 327 (2002), <br>> 01/16/02 <br>> NEW <br>> YORK, ET AL. v. FERC, ET AL. , 535 U.S. 1 (2002), 03/04/02 <br>> PENRY, <br>> JOHNNY PAUL v. JOHNSON, DIR. TX DCJ , 532 U.S. 782 (2001), 06/04/01 <br>> SPECTOR, <br>> DOUGLAS, ET AL. v. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE LTD. , 545 U.S. 119 (2005), <br>> 06/06/05 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. ALASKA , 474 U.S. 1044 (1986), 06/19/97 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. REORGANIZED CF&I FABRICATORS OF UTAH, INC., et al. , 518 <br>> U.S. 213 (1996), 06/20/96 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. O'HAGAN , U.S. 642 (1997), 06/25/97 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. HATTER, JUDGE, ET AL. , 532 U.S. 557 (2001), 05/21/01 <br>> UNITED <br>> STATES v. JAMES DANIEL GOOD REAL PROPERTY et al. , 510 U.S. 43 (1993), <br>> 12/13/93 <br>> UTAH, <br>> ET AL. v. EVANS, SEC. OF COMMERCE , 536 U.S. 452 (2002), 06/20/02 <br>> <br>>
g<br>> <br>> ----- Original Message ----- <br>> From: <br>> keely <br>> emerinemix <br>> To: jampot@roadrunner.com ; Tom Hansen ; <br>> godshatter@yahoo.com <br>> Cc: ttrail@house.state.id.us ; <br>> vision2020@moscow.com <br>> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 1:06 <br>> PM<br>> Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Reverse <br>> Racism?<br>> <br>> Evidence of intellectual deficit re: Justice Thomas? <br>> If I'm not mistaken, he has yet to offer an independent dissent or defense <br>> of a ruling, relying instead, it seems, on the work of Scalia and now <br>> Roberts and Alito. His background was less stellar than Sotomayor's, <br>> and yes, if he used his experiences as a man of color born in relative <br>> poverty to hone his judicial wisdom, he likely would render a richer, more <br>> wise decision. Unfortunately, he spends much of his public presence <br>> in decrying the same programs
that benefited him. I also think that <br>> knocking his sister as a "welfare queen" is not only cruel, but also plays <br>> distressingly into the far-right playbook that derides poor women of color <br>> in the same way. <br>> <br>> I find it interesting that white men who <br>> howl about affirmative action and entitlement are evidently unable to see <br>> that very many of their compatriots in the halls of power in this country <br>> were the recipients of "special consideration," like "legacy admissions" <br>> to Yale for George W. Bush, that elevated them not because of their <br>> ability and experience, but because of who they were apart from ability <br>> and experience. "Who they were" was defined by their being white <br>> men. For generations, white men have been boosted onto pedestals of <br>> power by other white men, richer, more powerful, older, and more seasoned,
<br>> who knew their fathers, worked with their grandfathers, were beholden to <br>> their uncles, or golfed with their brothers. Patronage, legacy <br>> admissions, nepotism, and political pay-back are forms of affirmative <br>> action that have benefited the majority but are now forgotten in the <br>> debate over legitimate social policy and "reverse <br>> racism."<br>> <br>> Disclaimers: I'm married to and in love with a white <br>> man, I've raised two young white men to adulthood, and my beloved dad was <br>> a white man. What's wonderful about all of them is that they <br>> recognize that their skin color and gender will generally favor them in <br>> this world, and they recognize that as true injustice, seek to reduce how <br>> much they benefit from it, and work for justice across gender, race, class <br>> and social lines. Further disclaimer: My 20-year-old son is a <br>> UI student, as were
both of his grandfathers and five previous generations <br>> of Mixes. He is on a Presidential Scholarship, which he was awarded <br>> on the basis of his GPA and leadership activities in high school, from <br>> which he graduated summa cum laude. He has continued with a 3.8 GPA <br>> while working through his first two years of school. He is a classic <br>> prototype of "legacy admission," but the UI isn't the Ivy League, and <br>> Anthony Mix isn't George W. Bush. And if his Mom weren't so <br>> well-known, and so likely to attract criticism for her views, none of this <br>> would have to be brought up.<br>> <br>> But it is what it is, isn't <br>> it?<br>> <br>> <br>> Keely<br>> http://keely-prevailingwinds.blogspot.com/<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> From: jampot@roadrunner.com<br>> To: kjajmix1@msn.com; thansen@moscow.com; <br>>
godshatter@yahoo.com<br>> CC: ttrail@house.state.id.us; <br>> vision2020@moscow.com<br>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Reverse <br>> Racism?<br>> Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 12:24:05 -0700<br>> <br>> <br>> No. But then again I wasn't asked. Do I believe that <br>> Justice Thomas was the finest legal mind available in all the land in <br>> 1991? No. He too was a prime example of affirmative action. I do not think <br>> he is "a dim bulb" however and I suspect your opinion is based on emotion <br>> and political leaning rather than any actual evidence of intellectual <br>> deficit. Plus if back story is the be all and end all of a supreme court <br>> nominee qualification, as so many are making it out to be, then he <br>> has Sotomeyor beat six ways to Sunday. After all, I would hope that a <br>> wise black man with the richness of his experiences, would more often <br>> then not reach a better
conclusion than a latina woman who hasn't lived <br>> that life. Surely you agree.<br>> <br>> g<br>> <br>> ----- <br>> Original Message ----- <br>> From: <br>> keely <br>> emerinemix <br>> To: <br>> jampot@roadrunner.com ; Tom Hansen <br>> ; godshatter@yahoo.com <br>> Cc: <br>> ttrail@house.state.id.us ; vision2020@moscow.com <br>> Sent: <br>> Sunday, May 31, 2009 9:58 AM<br>> Subject: <br>> RE: [Vision2020] Reverse Racism?<br>> <br>> I disagree with you completely. But what I'm really <br>> interested in is this: Did you make the same argument when <br>> Clarence Thomas was nominated? Because if you really want to <br>> showcase an intellectual dim bulb on the Supreme Court, that might be a <br>> good place to look.<br>> <br>> Keely<br>> http://keely-prevailingwinds.blogspot.com/<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> From: jampot@roadrunner.com<br>> To: thansen@moscow.com; godshatter@yahoo.com<br>> Date: <br>> Sun, 31 May 2009 09:42:55 -0700<br>> CC: ttrail@house.state.id.us; vision2020@moscow.com<br>> Subject: <br>> Re: [Vision2020] Reverse Racism?<br>> <br>> <br>> I'm very sorry to be the one to burst your <br>> little bubble but, while the nomination of your 55 year old latina <br>> is unquestionably politically savvy, she is far from the legal <br>> communities most prominent shining light. Her nomination will, no doubt, <br>> score OBL a few short term brownie points with a certain segment of the <br>> electorate but will leave scant impression on American jurisprudence. <br>> While her story is touching and all, you would be hard pressed to find <br>> anyone who honestly believes that she has the intellectual firepower <br>> to make any headway with legal minds the likes of Breyer <br>> or
Ginsberg much less Alito, Roberts, or Scalia. She is pretty much <br>> destined to be little more than a liberal "me too." In other words, <br>> affirmative action as it's most commonly practiced.<br>> <br>> g<br>> ----- Original Message ----- <br>> From: "Tom Hansen" <br>> To: "Paul Rumelhart" <br>> Cc: ; <br>> <br>> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 6:13 <br>> AM<br>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Reverse <br>> Racism?<br>> <br>> > Paul Rumelhart stated:<br>> > <br>> > "This is <br>> how it is supposed to work, as far as I understand it. All <br>> <br>> > other things being equal, choose the minority so that the staff <br>> becomes<br>> > more diverse. If the clear winner is a member of <br>> the majority or a<br>> >
minority, it doesn't matter, hire him or <br>> her."<br>> > <br>> > I agree with you partially, Paul. A job <br>> should go to the best qualified,<br>> > regardless of race/gender, even <br>> if the best qualified for the job happens<br>> > to be a 55-year-old <br>> Latina raised by a single parent in the projects of<br>> > the South <br>> Bronx.<br>> > <br>> > Right, g?<br>> > <br>> > Tom Hansen<br>> > <br>> Moscow, Idaho<br>> > <br>> > "The Pessimist complains about the wind, <br>> the Optimist expects it to change<br>> > and the Realist adjusts his <br>> sails."<br>> > <br>> > - Unknown<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> =======================================================<br>> > List <br>> services made available by First Step Internet, <br>> > serving <br>> the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <br>> <br>> > <br>> http://www.fsr.net <br>> <br>> > mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> > <br>> =======================================================<br>> ><br>> <br>> <br>> Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits. Check <br>> it out. <br>> <br>> <br>> Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits. Check it out. <br>> > Moscow, Idaho<br>> > <br>> <br>> > "The Pessimist complains about the wind, the Optimist expects it to <br>> change<br>> > and the Realist adjusts his sails."<br>> > <br>> > - <br>> Unknown<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> =======================================================<br>> > List <br>> services made available by First Step Internet, <br>> > serving
the <br>> communities of the Palouse since 1994. <br>> <br>> > <br>> http://www.fsr.net <br>> <br>> > mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> > <br>> =======================================================<br>> ><br>> <br>> <br>> Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits. Check <br>> it out. <br>> <br>> <br>> Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits. Check it out. heck it out. <br>> =======================================================<br>> List <br>> services made available by First Step Internet, <br>> serving the <br>> communities of the Palouse since 1994. <br>> <br>> http://www.fsr.net <br>> <br>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> =======================================================<br>> _________________________________________________________________<br>> Hotmail® has
ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits.<br>> http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Storage1_052009<br>> <BR><br /><hr />Hotmail® goes with you. <a href='http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Mobile?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Mobile1_052009' target='_new'>Get it on your BlackBerry or iPhone.</a></body>
</html>