<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Roger,<br><br>The only people claiming that whether waterboarding is torture is open for debate are people trying to defend the practice. It's torture, plain and simple. You referred to Hitchens. He called it torture after he went through it. Here's a link to an article he wrote about it:<br><br>http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/08/hitchens200808<br><br>I don't know how you can defend it or the use of other torture techniques. <br><br>Sunil<br><br>> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:48:50 -0700<br>> From: lfalen@turbonet.com<br>> To: vision2020@moscow.com<br>> Subject: [Vision2020] Harsh Interrogations<br>> <br>> All<br>> Looks like you have all been busy since I was last on here.<br>> The reports sited by Andreas do not gel with those I have reported on here previously.<br>> Every one should be opposed to torture for tortures sake or for sadistic pleasure(Abu Ghraib).<br>> Whether water boarding is torture or not is open to question. In any case it does not rise to the level of pulling out finger nails or pulling off arms. It it did ,I do not think that Oliver North and Christopher Hitckens would have submitted to it.<br>> Any so called enhanced interrogations should be used sparingly. It should only be used in those cases where it might prevent a major attack. It should never be a routine practice of the police force or for that matter of the military.<br>> Tom has relatives in L.A. He might change his mind if there were all wiped out by an attack on L.A. that could have been prevented. <br>> Roger<br>> <br>> =======================================================<br>> List services made available by First Step Internet, <br>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <br>> http://www.fsr.net <br>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> =======================================================<br></body>
</html>