<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16825" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>And once again you miss the point, attempt to
attach me to positions I have not taken, hurl invective, and do your best to
demonize and silence a point of view with which you disagree.You are as
predictable as a paperboy with OCD. You deliver on time, every time.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>g</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=ophite@gmail.com href="mailto:ophite@gmail.com">Andreas Schou</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=jampot@roadrunner.com
href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">g. crabtree</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=godshatter@yahoo.com
href="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com">Paul Rumelhart</A> ; <A
title=lfalen@turbonet.com href="mailto:lfalen@turbonet.com">lfalen</A> ; <A
title=bear@moscow.com href="mailto:bear@moscow.com">bear@moscow.com</A> ; <A
title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:31
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] "Harsh"
Interrogations -As ye sow, so shall you</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Gary --<BR><BR>From the FBI report on abuse at Guantanamo Bay
under Geoffrey Miller, the general later brought in to "Gitmoize" Abu Ghraib:
<BR><BR>"<FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=-1>on several
occasions, witness ("W") saw detainees ("ds") in interrogation rooms chained
hand and foot in fetal position to floor w/no chair/ food/water; most urinated
or defecated on selves, and were left there 18, 24 hrs or more. Once, the air
conditioning was so low that the barefoot d was shaking with cold. Another
time, it was off so the unventilated room was over 100 degrees, d was almost
unconscious on floor with a pile of hair next to him (he had apparently been
pulling it out throughout the night). Another time, it was sweltering hot and
loud rap music played - d's hand and foot was chained and he was in a fetal
position on the floor. Upon inquiry, W was told that interrogators [military
contractors] ordered this treatment. Took place in Delta
Camp</FONT>"<BR><BR>The report goes on to substantiate that more than one
detainee (d) was brought into the infirmary with hypothermia after an
interrogation session. Detainees pissing and shitting all over themselves.
Being sexually assaulted by female guards. Forced to stay awake for longer
than the human body can stand. Being partially drowned. Being stuck in a
coffin with what you're told are scorpions.<BR><BR>These are not conditions
you will find any Hilton other than the Hanoi. They are not on the continuum
of acceptable behaviors any more than a knife is on the continuum of
'comfortable objects' because, like a knife, it's also an object. These are
techniques we reverse-engineered from North Korean torture techniques in order
to create SERE, and then reverse-reverse engineered in order to create GTMO
and the "black sites." This is despite the fact that we -- as in, our country
-- prosecuted Japanese soldiers for waterboarding, and even Israel, no friend
of terrorists, has abandoned it because it produces bad intelligence. Indeed,
if I were just a little more cynical than I am, I'd say that that's quite the
point: we waterboarded KSM for information on the nonexistent Iraq-al-Qaida
connection, and Abu Zubaydah for information on confabulated terrorist plots
he had no reason to know about.<BR><BR>You're wrong about the facts. You're
wrong about the law. I could go on about that, but I'd just be arguing with
the tinny little noises escaping from the echo chamber you pretend will
replace journalism. I'm waiting with bated breath to find out why you think
the FBI is infiltrated by ACORN or how George Soros is dictating the legal
conclusions of Republican appointees at Foggy Bottom. That's just your
intentional ignorance, plus arrogance, tribalism, and smug self-satisfaction
at your clever turns of phrase. I can tolerate that. <BR><BR>What gets to me
-- why I'm provoked to respond -- is that you're willing, even eager, to sell
out our country's honor in order to soothe your rank cowardice. Or maybe it
makes you feel like a real man to hear that some punk Afghan teenager with an
AK-47 was awake for a week, stewing in his own shit, shackled to the floor.
Whatever the impulse is -- tribalism? sadism? fear? -- it's not anything I
recognize as American. What third-world tinpot dictatorship did you grow up in
that you think this is acceptable?<BR><BR>We consent to abide by certain
principles. It's that common consent that keeps our country from being a
collection of miscellaneous foreigners on someone else's land. I have
disagreements with conservatives about the metes and bounds of those
principles, sure. But here you are, disputing whether America should have
principles at all.<BR><BR>Americans, by which I mean FDR and Eisenhower,
Reagan and JFK, held off the Soviets and Nazi Germany, nations that both posed
a dire existential threat to our country, while banning torture, expanding the
protections of the Geneva Convention, and abandoning the pretense that it's
okay to attack civilian populations. These are tempting tactics. Some of them
work. Torture produces words rather than silence. The Geneva Convention bans
effective tactics for making war. Killing civilians forces submission. We
stepped away from these things. We won. Twice. Over the two most belligerent,
technologically advanced, and staggeringly immoral nations ever to exist, one
armed with enough weapons to destroy the world several times over.<BR><BR>But
then 9/11 made you wet yourself. A crime of unimaginable scale happened to
people in New York City; people whom you don't even accord the privilege of
being called Americans. The crime was carried out by guys carrying weapons you
can buy at Home Depot. Somehow, that uprooted your sense that America stands
for anything. But how deep were those roots, Gary, that fewer deaths than
those caused by the flu could pull them up?<BR><BR>Our soldiers make a
commitment. They tell us they'll uphold the Constitution. But there's a
reciprocal side to that commtiment: we tell them that they're the good guys;
that they're not just protecting American lives, but American values. That
they're fighting for liberty, mom, and apple pie. Because 9/11 made you wet
yourself, you're asking those soldiers to sit and play Minesweeper while some
dumb Afghan redneck shits his pants in Arctic cold, chained to the ceiling of
a lightless cell. If you tell his President to tell our soldiers to do that,
you've reneged on our commitment to make our soldiers the good guys. Our moral
purpose doesn't come from who we are; it comes from what we do.<BR><BR>I don't
know whether there's going to be a reckoning for the people that authorized
this. But you're the reason there should be: to put the rudder straight and
make people like you -- who actively argues for torture -- too ashamed to
speak up in public. Anything you just said should be enough to make any decent
person drop their beer, walk out of the room, and go find another locksmith.
I'm looking forward to the day when it is.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>