<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Typical, and predictable as the sun rising in the East. When Donovan is wrong he can't admit it, and if I call him on it he will launch into this slimy attack. Kind of like a jellyfish.<br><br>He's an interesting case study. The prolapse has clearly extruded his entire brain, yet he retains sufficient coordination to operate a keyboard.<br><br>Sunil<br><br><hr id="stopSpelling">Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:28:46 -0700<br>From: donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com<br>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] BACK to the Original Question<br>To: vision2020@moscow.com; sunilramalingam@hotmail.com; thansen@moscow.com; bear@moscow.com<br><br><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-size-adjust: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; -x-system-font: none;" valign="top"><div>Sorry, I disagree. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>I do agree with what the Ten Commandments say. But I think lots of people disagree with what the Ten Commandments intend and imply. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>What I think is a crock is their release. The reality is, child molesters are free, in part, because of the actions of Sunil. You can call it whatever you want, blame it on anyone else, but that is the reality. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>And I would not be calling the release of child molesters, "due process." That term is such an injustice to the victims of these people, or shall I call these child molesters, at the risk of offending some liberals on here, monsters. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Best Regards,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Donovan<br><br>--- On <b>Fri, 4/17/09, bear@moscow.com <i><bear@moscow.com></i></b> wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px;"><br>From: bear@moscow.com <bear@moscow.com><br>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] BACK to the Original Question<br>To: "Donovan Arnold" <donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com>, "vision 2020" <vision2020@moscow.com>, "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam@hotmail.com>, "Tom Hansen" <thansen@moscow.com><br>Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 8:11 AM<br><br>
<div class="EC_plainMail">Donovan, What a CROCK! <br><br>First you don't believe what the Ten Commandments say, and now you don't like the way the <br>law works! IF I read the court documents correctly, there was a JUDGE that released him,<br>not <br>Sunil! I am sorry that the State of Idaho, as represented by a prosecutor didn't prove<br>his/her <br>case that the individual was a threat to society. You're pointing the finger in the WRONG <br>direction on how the legal system worked in this case!<br><br><br><br><br>____________________________________________________________________________________________<br>> Hansen,<br>> <br>> Certainly not a lawyer with a forked tongue that misleads people to draw<br>> the wrong conclusions and to free child molesters. <br>> The child molester can at least claim mental illness for this endangerment<br>> of children. But what can Sunil claim? <br>> I remember, if my memory
serves me correctly, at how angry Hansen was that<br>> our local child molester of an eight year old girl, was allowed to drive,<br>w> ithout supervision, to Lewiston. Guess who was, in part, responsible for<br>> his release into the Moscow Public? <br>> Best Regards,<br>> <br>> Donovan <br>> <br>> --- On Fri, 4/17/09, Tom Hansen <<a href="http://us.mc381.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=thansen@moscow.com">thansen@moscow.com</a>> wrote:<br>> <br>> <br><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></tbody></table><br></body>
</html>