<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><DIV>Paul,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks for your thoughtful reply. And I apologize for the Nazi comment, I was over the line, just angry at what I considered a brush off of the murders. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>"Sounds like a great reason to work with the UN to apply sanctions to the <BR>country in question in a concerted effort to change their behavior. <BR>This happens every day, and Iraq and Afghanistan are hardly the only two <BR>countries in which this kind of behavior exists."</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I don't think the UN is effective. Its sanctions and resolutions are broken all the time without consequence. You might as well be complaining to Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny for help. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>"Bush, as far as I can tell, went to war based on the following reasons:<BR>*mumble* *mumble* 9/11 *mumble* *mumble* Saddam *mumble* *mumble* <BR>terrorism *mumble* *mumble* weapons of mass <BR>destruction!!!!!1!!one!!!1!!!!1!!!!"</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I think Bush had a reason to go to war with Iraq, it was to remove Saddam Hussian, establish a strong US military presents in the region, and make some people very wealthy. 9/11 was used as an excuse. It was his plan to invade Iraq, not matter what, as the plans were drawn even before 9/11. We invaded not for no reason, but for sinister reasons. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>"Just like an average person should not employ violence against anyone <BR>else unless they absolutely have to, we should not enter in to a war <BR>without *VERY* good reason. The main reason for this, one of which I'm <BR>sure you're aware, is that people die in wars. Lots of people"</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>First of all, people are dying anyway, lots of people. Second, there is heavy cost to pay for not going to war. Our hesitation to enter WWII cost far more lives than if we stopped Germany earlier. Third, dying is not the worst thing. To live in paralyzing fear, oppression, abuse, and without any hope of freedom, is far worse than the risk of dying in a war. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I ask, if people were pulling woman out of houses in your neighborhood and setting them on fire, if woman in your family were raped at will, and gays were just shot in the street for doing nothing against anyone, the disabled strapped with explosives used as living weapons, would you not consider that reason to fight for freedom? Or would you rather just be alive and live in that kind of world? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>This country declared war against the British for the price of tea and sugar. India for salt. I think living conditions of woman and gay men are horrible enough as to stop funding and working with these oppressive governments and to take forceful actions against them. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>When you say you oppose military action, are you saying you would rather allow the suffering of 100s of millions, because that is better than killing the those that do it and a few innocent people? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>How horrible and unjust does a society have to get before military action in your eyes is justified? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Best Regards,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Donovan</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><BR>--- On <B>Tue, 4/7/09, Paul <SPAN>Rumelhart</SPAN> <I><godshatter@yahoo.com></I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>From: Paul <SPAN>Rumelhart</SPAN> <godshatter@yahoo.com><BR>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Six gay men shot to death in Iraq<BR>To: "Donovan Arnold" <donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com><BR>Cc: vision2020@moscow.com<BR>Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2009, 12:38 PM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=plainMail>Donovan Arnold wrote:<BR>> Paul,<BR>> <BR>> My point is, societies that beat their woman, legalize rape of their <BR>> woman, set woman on fire, and mass murder gays, should not be funded <BR>> by the US, supported by the US, and the US should make serious efforts <BR>> to stop the behavior, not justify it, excuse it, and ignore it.<BR>><BR><BR>Sounds like a great reason to work with the UN to apply sanctions to the <BR>country in question in a concerted effort to change their behavior. <BR>This happens every day, and Iraq and Afghanistan are hardly the only two <BR>countries in which this kind of behavior exists.<BR><BR>> <BR>> My second point is, that you are so opposed to any war, of any kind, <BR>> at any time, in any place, that you would most likely even oppose war <BR>> against Hitler, had you existed then. Bottom-line, I believe you think <BR>> opposing war is ALWAYS the
right thing. I think you are wrong. And I <BR>> am proved correct by your inability to come up with a real or <BR>> fictional scenario where you think war or military action is right. I <BR>> believe you are confused to think there is never a situation that <BR>> calls for military action or forceful action against another group of <BR>> people.<BR>><BR><BR>Just like an average person should not employ violence against anyone <BR>else unless they absolutely have to, we should not enter in to a war <BR>without *VERY* good reason. The main reason for this, one of which I'm <BR>sure you're aware, is that people die in wars. Lots of people. Us, <BR>them, people not even involved, you name it. Sometimes in the hundreds <BR>of thousands or even millions. Each and every one of them leaves behind <BR>family and friends that have to suffer the aftermath of a loved one <BR>being killed. The other reasons why
war is bad are trivial by comparison.<BR><BR>War should be a last resort, because the cost is so high in human <BR>lives. We shouldn't go to war to try to enact a change in policy in a <BR>country. We shouldn't go to war because we think the leaders of a <BR>country might be planning something unless we have very good intel <BR>showing that to be true. We should try all sorts of other options, <BR>including diplomacy, to avoid it.<BR><BR>Bush, as far as I can tell, went to war based on the following reasons:<BR><BR>*mumble* *mumble* 9/11 *mumble* *mumble* Saddam *mumble* *mumble* <BR>terrorism *mumble* *mumble* weapons of mass <BR>destruction!!!!!1!!one!!!1!!!!1!!!!<BR><BR>Not, in my opinion, a good enough reason to expend lives (ours and <BR>theirs). Our former President had a responsibility to the members of <BR>the US military that he downright disregarded for who knows what reasons.<BR><BR>The threat of Nazi Germany was a
completely different situation. You'll <BR>remember that we didn't join that war until we were attacked, which I <BR>can see the rationale for. Comparing the reasons for going to war with <BR>Iraq vs. going to war with Germany and Japan is almost impossible, <BR>because they are not even in the same county, let alone in the same <BR>ballpark.<BR><BR>So, to answer your insinuations, yes - I oppose war unconditionally at <BR>first, until I've been convinced that there is an extremely good reason <BR>for it - and even then I do so with a heavy heart, knowing that many <BR>people will die along the way. I'm not apologetic about this.<BR><BR>Paul<BR><BR>"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." - Isaac Asimov through <BR>the character Salvor Hardin in "Foundation".<BR><BR>=======================================================<BR>List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR>serving the communities of the Palouse since
1994. <BR> <A href="http://www.fsr.net/" target=_blank>http://www.fsr.net</A> <BR> mailto:<A href="http://us.mc381.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Vision2020@moscow.com" ymailto="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>=======================================================<BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table><br>