Awesome. I'm going to convert to Christian Science and go to pharmacy school. Easiest. Job. Ever. And guaranteed by law!<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Glenn Schwaller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vpschwaller@gmail.com">vpschwaller@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hmmmm . . . I suspect once again that, once again, Moscow Tom is confused over what "really is" as opposed to what he wants something to be. I can see no wording in HO216 whatsoever that would support MT's claim that this bill "allows potential employers to evaluate a pharmacist's job application." Where do you get this stuff?!?!<br>
<br>Allow me to direct you to the one salient section that apparently MT didn't bother to read carefully (or at all), 54-1718A Paragraph (3) which states: <br><br>"It shall be unlawful to discriminate against ANY (my caps) person based upon his or her declining to dispense or distribute pharmaceutical care or a drug or drugs that violate his or her conscience."<br>
<br>I think it is safe to say this is on point with respect to any potential discriminatory hiring practices. <br><font color="#888888"><br>GS</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Tom Hansen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com" target="_blank">thansen@moscow.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">What I am concerned with is . . .<br>
<br>
House Bill 216 allows potential employers to evaluate a pharmacist's job<br>
application on the applicant's religious, moral, and ethical values.<br>
<br>
"Sorry, Matt. But we here at Smith's Pharmacy feel that your pro-life<br>
ethic may adversely impact upon your duties when it comes to filling some<br>
of our most loyal customers' prescriptions."<br>
<br>
How is that right?<br>
<br>
Tom Hansen<br>
Moscow, Idaho<br>
<div><br>
> > In closing:<br>
> ><br>
> > <a href="http://www.fda.gov/CDER/DRUG/infopage/planB/planBQandA.htm" target="_blank">http://www.fda.gov/CDER/DRUG/infopage/planB/planBQandA.htm</a><br>
> ><br>
> > “Plan B works like other birth control pills to prevent pregnancy.<br>
</div>Pla> n B<br>
<div>> > acts primarily by stopping the release of an egg from the ovary<br>
(ovulatio> n).<br>
> > It may prevent the union of sperm and egg (fertilization). If<br>
fertilizati> on<br>
> > does occur, Plan B may prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the<br>
wom> b<br>
> > (implantation). If a fertilized egg is implanted prior to taking Plan<br>
B,<br>
> > Plan B will not work.”<br>
> ><br>
> > So, if you think a fertilized embryo is “human”, Plan B can cause<br>
> > abortions. Pesky things, those semantics.<br>
> ><br>
> If it's your position that birth control is itself abortion, you're at<br>
odds<br>
> with even the Catholic church's maximalist position on abortion.<br>
><br>
> --ACS<br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div><div><div></div><div>Join us at The First Annual Intolerista Wingding, April 17th, featuring<br>
Roy Zimmerman and Jeanne McHale. For details go to . . .<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.MoscowCares.com/Wingding" target="_blank">http://www.MoscowCares.com/Wingding</a><br>
<br>
Seeya<br>
there.<br>
<br>
---------------------------------------------<br>
This message was sent by First Step Internet.<br>
<a href="http://www.fsr.com/" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.com/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div><br>=======================================================<br>
List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>
<a href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.net</a><br>
mailto:<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
=======================================================<br></blockquote></div><br>