Hmmmm . . . I suspect that once again Moscow Tom is confused over what "really is" as opposed to what he wants something to be, yet another indication of his breadth of his self-aggrandizing and narcissistic inner child. <br>
<br>HB216 deals primarily, if not exclusively, with the dispensing of Plan B, the so-called morning after pill for inducing abortion. The language I have found strongly suggests the target is reproductive-based medication "and other medications" which are not mentioned. I'll go out on a limb here and assume they too are reproductive-associated medications and not an asthma inhaler or blood pressure medication, for example.<br>
<br>To comment that a pharmacist is going to refuse service because of his or her objection to a particular life-style is as ludicrous as suggesting he or she would do this based on race or religion. Not that this may not happen in an EXTREMELY isolated incident, but to use this argument as a basis for defeating a bill seems a tad over the top. Maybe a more learned legal mind would like to comment on how such actions would infringe on an individuals civil rights with respect to these ACLU-given rights. But I seriously doubt one could construe reproductive choice as a "lifestyle".<br>
<br>On the other hand, if one were to accept MT's argument as valid, I think it is safe to assume that 1) if Pharmacist is aware of Citizen B's sexual orientation he must know Citizen B rather well - or at least in passing. I think it is also in the realm of possibility that 2) Citizen B would know Pharmacist and his views on Citizen B's life style. This being the case, 3) Citizen B would more than likely avoid any contact with Pharmacist just to reduce the likelihood of any potentially ugly situations. I would further suggest that, unless Citizen B has been wandering about in a stupor and is totally unaware of HB216, said Citizen would avoid Pharmacist like the plague. These being the cases, if Citizen B chooses to have a prescription filled by someone suspected of being a discriminatory racist pig, then perhaps Pharmacist IS guilty of a civil rights violation - and Citizen B is guilty of simply being stupid.<br>
<br>GS<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Tom Hansen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com">thansen@moscow.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Courtesy of the Spokesman Review's blog site.<br>
<br>
---------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Pharmacist conscience bill heads for amendment<br>
at 8:04 a.m. on March 18<br>
<br>
Rep. Tom Loertscher’s bill to give pharmacists or “any person” the right<br>
to refuse to fill a prescription for a patient on the basis of conscience<br>
is headed for the House’s amending order, to revise the bill so it applies<br>
only to pharmacists - not to cashiers, stores, or others. Rep. Lynn Luker,<br>
R-Boise, proposed the amendments. “It’s simply a matter of burden of<br>
proof,” he said. “I don’t think it will change in any way the current<br>
practices, because people do have that right.” Emotional testimony on the<br>
bill stretched for two days before it was approved for amendment on a 14-4<br>
vote. The testimony included pharmacists and other experts who said Idaho<br>
pharmacists already have the right to refuse to fill a prescription; Idaho<br>
has no law requiring them to fill all prescriptions. Among those who<br>
testified was pharmacist Gloria Hansen, who said, “I do know that we need<br>
to act according to our conscience. .. I lean on the rock which is the<br>
lord God.”<br>
<br>
---------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
It is truly a sad day in Idaho for those citizens whose ethics, morals,<br>
and religious beliefs differ from those of their pharmacist.<br>
<br>
Query: If an asthmatic, living in extremely rural Idaho, dependent on<br>
inhalers for survival, is refused access to such much-needed inhalers, by<br>
his/her pharmacist, because (s)he is gay or his/her<br>
ethics/morals/religious beliefs differ from his/her pharmacist's<br>
ethics/morals/religious beliefs . . . and the asthmatic dies as a<br>
result . . . is the pharmacist guilty of ANYTHING?<br>
<br>
Seeya round town, Moscow.<br>
<br>
Tom Hansen<br>
Moscow, Idaho<br>
<br>
Join us at The First Annual Intolerista Wingding, April 17th, featuring<br>
Roy Zimmerman and Jeanne McHale. For details go to . . .<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.MoscowCares.com/Wingding" target="_blank">http://www.MoscowCares.com/Wingding</a><br>
<br>
Seeya<br>
there.<br>
<br>
---------------------------------------------<br>
This message was sent by First Step Internet.<br>
<a href="http://www.fsr.com/" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.com/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>=======================================================<br>
List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>
<a href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.net</a><br>
mailto:<a href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>
=======================================================<br></blockquote></div><br>