<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><DIV>Hansen fails to understand three important points:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1) If Hansen had the state sanctioned power to end his wife's life because she was in pain, his health insurance company would be offering him two numbers, one of a bill he couldn't possibly pay in his lifetime if she lives, and a second number attached to a check for him to retire comfortably if he exercises his new Godlike powers over his wife and kills her. While most people would use their license to kill for good intentions, some might kill relatives for profit or to eliminate the responsibility of caring for someone they don't want to any more. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>2) Society would stop finding the cures and treatments for diseases and illnesses because we can simply end suffering by killing those outside our current ability to help if killing is an acceptable solution to the problem. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>3) It is a dangerous slippery slope when people start assigning which people we should kill and not kill based on their current living condition and the amount of pain we think they should not be required to endure. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I believe that the rational and compassionate position when one sees a loved one in pain and discomfort should be to work to find a cure or treatment to what hinders them, not to demand the power and authority to kill them. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Best Regards,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Donovan </DIV>
<DIV><BR>--- On <B>Fri, 11/14/08, Tom Hansen <I><thansen@moscow.com></I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid">From: Tom Hansen <thansen@moscow.com><BR>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] "unpleasant death as a result of disease or illness".<BR>To: "lfalen" <lfalen@turbonet.com>, thansen@moscow.com, donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com, vpschwaller@gmail.com, vision2020@moscow.com, sunilramalingam@hotmail.com<BR>Date: Friday, November 14, 2008, 10:36 AM<BR><BR><PRE>Exactly, Roger -
I can give a tinker's damn on which side of the political aisle you hang
your hat. When it comes to decisions concerning prolonging a painful and
diseased life, that decision should be made after careful consideration by
the affected parties, NOT the government.
If my wife were suffering to the point where life only served to prolong
pain, I would honor her expressed wishes. And if the government were to
<SPAN><SPAN>initervene</SPAN></SPAN> and say, "No, Mr. Hansen. Her continued agony will be
maintained because we think it's right," well, then . . . they might
as
well bury me with her, because if it is the very last thing I do on this
mortal coil, it will be to honor her wishes.
Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho
> Tom
> This is much like the living will my mother had. She wanted pain killers
but no life
support measures.
>
Roger
---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
http://www.fsr.com/
=======================================================
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the <SPAN>Palouse</SPAN> since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
=======================================================
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table><br>