<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<BR>> Message: 3<BR>> Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:51:00 -0700<BR>> From: Scott Dredge <scooterd408@hotmail.com><BR>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Gays Right to Marriage vs. Black's Right to<BR>> Vote<BR>> To: <donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com>, viz <vision2020@moscow.com><BR>> Message-ID: <BAY117-W166635009C5E60BF8F1C3FE41A0@phx.gbl><BR>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Yes, It's quite ironic since Interracial marriages were banned in California until 1948. According to Dale (who obviously struggled mightily with his attraction to men since he insists that sexuality a choice and not something determined by birth), the voting went the way it did because race is not a choice where as homosexuality / heterosexuality is a choice.<BR>> <BR>> -Scott <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
I found this YouTube vid made by a lawyer has a nice way of explaining California's supreme court view of their constitution when gay marriage rights were being debated before. Watch it here:<BR>
<BR>
<A href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riGXuhwLYVI">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riGXuhwLYVI</A><BR><BR><br /><hr />Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live <a href='http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/119462413/direct/01/' target='_new'>Click here</a></body>
</html>