<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Do you have any evidence at all that "Gabe Storm" is Joe Anybody? <br><br>Keely<br>http://keely-prevailingwinds.blogspot.com/<br><br><br>> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:48:28 -0800<br>> From: no.weatherman@gmail.com<br>> To: vision2020@moscow.com<br>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Apology to Keely<br>> <br>> Joe:<br>> <br>> First you accused me of harassing you.<br>> <br>> Then you came back for more.<br>> <br>> Then you left the forum in disgrace when I caught you lying.<br>> <br>> Then you wrote me a stupid email offlist.<br>> <br>> Now you're back with a pseudonym.<br>> <br>> I offered to play a game with you and I laid down the rules.<br>> <br>> The rules are fair and easy. Even you can understand them.<br>> <br>> My offer stands.<br>> <br>> <br>> On 10/29/08, Gabe Storm <no.weathermann@gmail.com> wrote:<br>> > Here's what you should do. Take any one of your posts where you've wanted to<br>> > draw some conclusion. Write out the premises in detail and then write out<br>> > the conclusion that you want us to draw. If the likelihood of the conclusion<br>> > is highly probable, then it is not a fallacy. If you can't find one example<br>> > that is not a fallacy, I win.<br>> ><br>> > I would do it but frankly your posts are too confusing. I'm not even sure<br>> > what the conclusions are let alone the premises.<br>> ><br>> > Sincerely, Austin Rench<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:11 AM, No Weatherman <no.weatherman@gmail.com><br>> > wrote:<br>> > > Mr. Storm:<br>> > ><br>> > > Let's play a game.<br>> > ><br>> > > The rules are that you have to show me one fallacious ad hominem<br>> > > argument and one lie that I have posted on the Internet and I will<br>> > > apologize for it to you and to Joe Campbell.<br>> > ><br>> > > But you have to prove each point and you cannot make bare assertions<br>> > > as you normally do.<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > On 10/29/08, Gabe Storm <no.weathermann@gmail.com> wrote:<br>> > > > I just wanted to say I was sorry for calling Keely a liar. It was<br>> > > > unChristian of me to do so. Frankly, I'm not sure why I act the way I<br>> > act,<br>> > > > going to church and posting lies on the internet. Most of my posts are<br>> > > > hogwash and my arguments are, well as some have noticed they are nothing<br>> > > > more than various forms of ad hominem fallacy. I seem to like that one a<br>> > > > lot!<br>> > > ><br>> > > > Sincerely, No Weatherman<br>> > > > =======================================================<br>> > > > List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>> > > > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>> > > > http://www.fsr.net<br>> > > > mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> > > ><br>> > =======================================================<br>> > > ><br>> > ><br>> > > =======================================================<br>> > > List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>> > > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>> > > http://www.fsr.net<br>> > > mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> > > =======================================================<br>> > ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> <br>> =======================================================<br>> List services made available by First Step Internet, <br>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <br>> http://www.fsr.net <br>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> =======================================================<br><br /><hr />Want to read Hotmail messages in Outlook? The Wordsmiths show you how. <a href='http://windowslive.com/connect/post/wedowindowslive.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!20EE04FBC541789!167.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_092008' target='_new'>Learn Now</a></body>
</html>