<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Two days ago, I emailed Doug Wilson to see if he was No Weatherman or if he knew he or another Anselm House habitue' was presumed to be No Weatherman. I told him Weatherman was not only a real ass, but, if not him or one of his staff or elders, someone who also undoubtedly enjoys the fact that many people think his missives originate from a Kirker, if not from Wilson himself. Here is our correspondence, in which he says he isn't and doesn't know who is, with my thanks:<br><br>Keely,<br><br>Thanks
for checking. I haven't looked at V2020 for a year or two, and really
have no idea. I am not "No Weatherman," and don't know of anyone who
might be doing that. I don't even know enough to say whether I would <i>mind </i>being "No Weatherman."<br><br>Cordially in Christ,<br>Douglas Wilson<br><br>To my question of whether or not I could post his response:<br><br>sure<br><br>* * * * * * * *<br>(Keely again)<br><br>So there are three things I know without dispute:<br><br>1. No Weatherman is a coward, a bigot, a troublemaker and a snot who refuses to answer my offlist questions about his identity.<br><br>2. Wilson says it isn't him or, to his knowledge, no one he knows.<br><br>3. That doesn't mean it ISN'T someone he knows, and it doesn't mean that person ISN'T enjoying the presumption of Anselm-ness that is the conventional wisdom. And yeah -- I still think it likely is a Kirker.<br><br>And, one more for today: The whole thing is terribly, terribly sad, and if Wilson does ever discover who NW is, I hope he acts pastoral and, figuratively, gives him a swift kick in the ass.<br><br>Keely<br>http://keely-prevailingwinds.blogspot.com/<br><br /><hr />When your life is on the go—take your life with you. <a href='http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/' target='_new'>Try Windows Mobile® today</a></body>
</html>