<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
1. Their actions appear intended to steal this election. <br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
2. If they steal this election, this republic is screwed.</blockquote><div> <br></div></div>The Republicans pulled out this same storyline in 2006 and 2004. <br><br>They put strict ID requirements into the Help America Vote Act to prevent registration fraud from translating into actual voter fraud. Again, there's absolutely no evidence that registration fraud can be translated easily into voter fraud; there's no evidence that a systematic voting-fraud conspiracy exists or has existed since the Tammany Hall days*; there are only nonsensical arguments that a significant number of people, however desperate, could be induced to commit a felony for the amount of money per vote that any liberal organization could pay.<br>
<br>You're the one making wildly conspiratorial allegations. It's your responsibility to provide the evidence. All you can provide are assertions that the evidence isn't important.<br><br>-- ACS<br><br>* Or the systematic and Constitutionally legitimized voter fraud embodied by the 3/5ths Compromise. <br>
** Also incidentally, ACORN claims to have registered 1.8m people for this election. Roughly 30,000 registrations have been rejected as incomplete or fraudulent; 5,000 were in Lake County, Indiana. This is numerically large, but also only %1.6. <br>
</div>