<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16705" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>No
Weatherman:<BR>Until today, I have not responded to your posts for several
reasons:<BR>1. you do not have the integrity to sign your opinions<BR>2. you
stretch and mangle the truth to suit your perspectives<BR>3. your tone and
message is strident, mean-spirited, angry, and offensive<BR><BR>However, I am
going to respond this one time -- just to gloat.<BR>The joke, you see, is all on
you. The more you sputter and bellow, the <BR>worse it gets for
you.<BR>The national numbers clearly show this is happening in all parts of this
<BR>country -- Americans are finally awakening to the reality of your kind of
<BR>divisive rhetoric.<BR>The more the Republican spin-meisters try to compare a
single sixty-year old <BR>professor of education with a horde of bomb-throwing
Islamic warriors the <BR>worse it gets for the Republicans. More and more
voters are turned off by <BR>what they (correctly) perceive as the
desperation of the Republican <BR>true-believers.<BR>One reason is that
Americans are getting tired of this empty anger, and <BR>another reason is that
Obama has been masterful at reframing the issue.<BR><BR>So, continue if you
wish, I'll be laughing as you dig your hole deeper.<BR>BL<BR><BR><BR><BR>-----
Original Message ----- <BR>From: "No Weatherman" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:no.weatherman@gmail.com"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3>no.weatherman@gmail.com</FONT></A><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3>><BR>To: <</FONT><A href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com"><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3>vision2020@moscow.com</FONT></A><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3>><BR>Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 1:50
PM<BR>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Election Fraud<BR><BR><BR>>
Chas:<BR>><BR>> Dave absolutely made an argument and he premised it on the
law — "they<BR>> have to turn in fraudulent ballots, it's the
law!"<BR>><BR>> However, his premise neglected to consider that tiny
little fact that<BR>> ACORN broke the law when they committed felonies by
knowingly<BR>> registering dead people to vote with the intent to turn in
those<BR>> fraudulent registrations because according to them the law
requires<BR>> them to.<BR>><BR>> You can't have it both
ways.<BR>><BR>><BR>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Chasuk
<</FONT><A href="mailto:chasuk@gmail.com"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3>chasuk@gmail.com</FONT></A><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>>
wrote:<BR>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:19, No Weatherman <</FONT><A
href="mailto:no.weatherman@gmail.com"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3>no.weatherman@gmail.com</FONT></A><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3>> <BR>>> wrote:<BR>>><BR>>>> You're arguing that
once ACORN commits fraud by registering dead<BR>>>> voters, they have a
legal obligation to submit those fraudulent<BR>>>> registrations to the
state.<BR>>><BR>>> Dave wasn't arguing anything. He was
stating a matter of law, which<BR>>> you didn't refute, but twisted into
an "argument," solely for the<BR>>> purpose of making an ad hominem
accusation.<BR>>><BR>><BR>>
=======================================================<BR>> List services
made available by First Step Internet,<BR>> serving the communities of the
Palouse since
1994.<BR>>
</FONT><A href="http://www.fsr.net/"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3>http://www.fsr.net</FONT></A><BR><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3>> </FONT><A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3>mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</FONT></A><BR><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3>>
=======================================================<BR>><BR>>
</FONT><BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>