<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
And, Paul, please explain why five former Secretaries of State, three of them Republicans, would have the gall to disagree with our Weatherman.<br><br><br>Keely<br>http://keely-prevailingwinds.blogspot.com/<br><br><br>> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:58:50 -0800<br>> From: no.weatherman@gmail.com<br>> To: vision2020@moscow.com<br>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Candidate issues - Foreign Policy<br>> <br>> Paul:<br>> <br>> Please tell us why you think chit chatting with Ahmadinejad could<br>> possibly accomplish anything and tell us why you think he's a<br>> trustworthy fellow.<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter@yahoo.com> wrote:<br>> > Correction. There's only one way to deal with them if that's the only<br>> > option you leave open for yourself. If you can save the lives of who knows<br>> > how many US troops and innocent Irani civilians through negotiations, why<br>> > not try? That's assuming our fears of their having nuclear weapons are<br>> > indeed well-founded, and their threats of attacking another sovereign nation<br>> > are real and imminent.<br>> ><br>> > Paul<br>> ><br>> > No Weatherman wrote:<br>> >><br>> >> It's not unreasonable to require a terrorist state that is armed to<br>> >> the teeth to take a sedative before discussions.<br>> >><br>> >> It is completely absurd to ask a global leader to abandon its foreign<br>> >> policy as well as its international friends before discussions begin.<br>> >><br>> >> Ahmadinejad is a lunatic who should not be allowed to host nukes. Iran<br>> >> would destroy Israel as fast as they'd hang a homosexual.<br>> >><br>> >> There's only one way to deal effectively with terrorist leaders. It's<br>> >> not pleasant and the world community will frown on it but in the end<br>> >> terrorists understand only one kind of language — physical violence.<br>> >><br>> >> The Neville Chamberlains and Barack Obamas of the world think they can<br>> >> reason with terrorists, but they cannot. Having tea with Adolf or<br>> >> talking shop with Ahmadinejad will only prolong the inevitable.<br>> >><br>> >> The minute someone threatens to take another person's life, whether<br>> >> individually or nationally, all negotiations should cease and<br>> >> reasonable people must begin contemplating the very thing that Neville<br>> >> and Barack think they can avoid.<br>> >><br>> >> Sooner or later someone is going to have to make the decision to take<br>> >> out Iran's nukes. It will probably be Israel, like they took out<br>> >> Iraq's in 81, and I hope they have the complete support of the US.<br>> >><br>> >><br>> >><br>> >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter@yahoo.com><br>> >> wrote:<br>> >><br>> >>><br>> >>> Iran is doing the exact same thing Bush is. They are attempting to get<br>> >>> the<br>> >>> other party to commit to exactly the outcome they want from the talks<br>> >>> before<br>> >>> they begin. It's the perfect way to look like you want to negotiate when<br>> >>> what you really want is your way or the highway.<br>> >>><br>> >>> The fact that we do the same thing embarrasses me. This is not "higher<br>> >>> standards", it's on the level of what third-graders would do.<br>> >>><br>> >>> Paul<br>> >>><br>> >>> No Weatherman wrote:<br>> >>><br>> >>>><br>> >>>> Just when I thought we had the fixin's for an interesting subject to<br>> >>>> discuss, Iran had to go and set two preconditions before they'd meet<br>> >>>> with the US:<br>> >>>><br>> >>>><br>> >>>><br>> >>>> http://newsbusters.org/blogs/terry-trippany/2008/10/13/iran-refuses-meet-us-without-preconditions<br>> >>>><br>> >>>> IOW, the president of a terrorist state has higher standards for<br>> >>>> negotiation than Barack Obama.<br>> >>>><br>> >>>><br>> >>>> On 10/12/08, Art Deco <deco@moscow.com> wrote:<br>> >>>><br>> >>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> Paul writes:<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> "I'm happy that Obama has some experience with Islam and Muslims." In<br>> >>>>> addition, he argues that open discussion without conditions among those<br>> >>>>> that<br>> >>>>> disagree is generally desirable.<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> I can't agree strongly enough with the second sentiment. While<br>> >>>>> discussion<br>> >>>>> may not always lead to conflict resolution, having no discussion never<br>> >>>>> does.<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> With regard to his first point:<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> I think it a very big mistake to think there is heterogeneity within<br>> >>>>> the<br>> >>>>> so-called Islamic community and within the so-called Christian<br>> >>>>> Community.<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> There are two major Islamic sects between which there is very little<br>> >>>>> harmony, theological or otherwise. In fact, active news readers will<br>> >>>>> know<br>> >>>>> that the division between the two sects is so great that it frequently<br>> >>>>> provokes murderous acts and other atrocities.<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> According to The Encyclopedia of American Religion there are at least<br>> >>>>> 280<br>> >>>>> identifiable Christian sects of some noteworthy size in the US each<br>> >>>>> with<br>> >>>>> significant but differing sub-sects. In addition, pick a major ethical<br>> >>>>> issue -- abortion, death penalty, gay marriage, gun control,<br>> >>>>> environmental<br>> >>>>> stewardship, etc -- and it is easy to find major Christian sects on the<br>> >>>>> opposite sides of the issue.<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> Nobody speaks for either the so-called Islamic community or so-called<br>> >>>>> Christian community, and in reality rather than artificial semantic<br>> >>>>> classification, there are no such communities. Things are far more<br>> >>>>> complex<br>> >>>>> ,and to some extent, much more fluid than that.<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> Discussion is very important. But it is important to know with whom<br>> >>>>> you<br>> >>>>> are<br>> >>>>> having a discussion, who they may or may not represent, and what power<br>> >>>>> or<br>> >>>>> influence they may yield over those they may claim to represent. This<br>> >>>>> is<br>> >>>>> especially true on the national and international level.<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> W.<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----<br>> >>>>> From: Paul Rumelhart<br>> >>>>> To: No Weatherman<br>> >>>>> Cc: vision2020@moscow.com<br>> >>>>> Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2008 4:03 PM<br>> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Candidate issues — Foreign Policy<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> I was planning on starting other issues threads, anyway. I guess I'd<br>> >>>>> like to start with the implication that simply sitting down to talk<br>> >>>>> with<br>> >>>>> someone without preconditions is somehow the wrong thing to do. If we<br>> >>>>> don't start a dialogue, how are we supposed to get anywhere?<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> Diplomacy used to be this country's strong suit, before our current<br>> >>>>> President trashed out international reputation. Sit down, discuss,<br>> >>>>> look<br>> >>>>> for points of potential compromise, stand firm on issues we have no<br>> >>>>> room<br>> >>>>> for compromise on. It's an art that our country seems to have lost.<br>> >>>>> We<br>> >>>>> have a lot more weapons in our arsenal than tanks and automatic rifles,<br>> >>>>> if we'd just use them.<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> Also, sitting down and discussing issues with bad people, even<br>> >>>>> terrorists, does not transfer those ideas automatically like some kind<br>> >>>>> of virus. Besides, today's terrorist is yesterday's CIA trainee. It's<br>> >>>>> a crazy world we live in, and uncompromising positions based on fear<br>> >>>>> doesn't serve us too well in it.<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> I'm happy that Obama has some experience with Islam and Muslims. He<br>> >>>>> might be able to get past this country's prejudices and find a solution<br>> >>>>> to Iraq that is workable for everyone. That is, if he doesn't get shot<br>> >>>>> because some idiot thinks he's an "Ayrab".<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> Paul<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> No Weatherman wrote:<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>>> Paul:<br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>>> Don't be offended but I'd rather not participate in the economic part<br>> >>>>>> of the conversation because I don't believe any candidate can "fix"<br>> >>>>>> the economy and in the end both men offer loser plans.<br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>>> When you're ready, I'd like to address foreign policy and Barack<br>> >>>>>> Obama's willingness to sit down with rogue world leaders, without<br>> >>>>>> precoditions, like Iran's president who believes Israel should be<br>> >>>>>> "wiped off the map."<br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>>> The irony with this position is that while some of Obama's LOUD and<br>> >>>>>> dishonest supporters in this forum refuse to engage me at all, their<br>> >>>>>> homeboy Barack Obama wants to sit down with leaders of<br>> >>>>>> terrorist-sponsoring countries without any preconditions that would<br>> >>>>>> hold those countries responsible.<br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>>> I don't know the reason for Obama's naive approach to foreign policy<br>> >>>>>> but the best explanation for this policy is that Obama has spent a the<br>> >>>>>> vast majority of his adult life palling around with terrorists, both<br>> >>>>>> international and domestic, and so his foreign policy would be no<br>> >>>>>> different.<br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter@yahoo.com><br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> wrote:<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>> Right now, because the money has to come from somewhere and I'd<br>> >>>>>>> rather<br>> >>>>>>> it<br>> >>>>>>> not be on the backs of the middle class, I'd say I'm for shifting<br>> >>>>>>> some<br>> >>>>>>> of<br>> >>>>>>> the tax burden to the corporations instead. I wouldn't call it<br>> >>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> "penalizing"<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>> them, but the money has to come from somewhere.<br>> >>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>> Getting out of Iraq would also help the economy.<br>> >>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>> Paul<br>> >>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>> No Weatherman wrote:<br>> >>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>> Apologies. My bad.<br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>> So where are you on the issue?<br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>> Penalize corporations or relieve their burden?<br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Paul Rumelhart<br>> >>>>>>>> <godshatter@yahoo.com><br>> >>>>>>>> wrote:<br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>> I'm sorry, but the hell they do. I'm not saying that no<br>> >>>>>>>>> corporations<br>> >>>>>>>>> should<br>> >>>>>>>>> make a profit. That would be silly. I'm saying that no _specific_<br>> >>>>>>>>> corporation has a right to a profit. They only have a right to be<br>> >>>>>>>>> able<br>> >>>>>>>>> to<br>> >>>>>>>>> compete on a level playing field.<br>> >>>>>>>>> If Corporation X goes broke because Uncle Sam raised their taxes,<br>> >>>>>>>>> then<br>> >>>>>>>>> Corporation Y (who has found a way to work a little leaner) will<br>> >>>>>>>>> step<br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> in<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>> and<br>> >>>>>>>>> take over their customers. Likewise, if Corporation X pulls up<br>> >>>>>>>>> it's<br>> >>>>>>>>> stakes<br>> >>>>>>>>> in the US and moves it's headquarters to China, then Corporation Y<br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> might<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>> just step up to the plate with a "made in America" ad campaign.<br>> >>>>>>>>> It's<br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> not<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>> like we're going to run every corporation into the ground because<br>> >>>>>>>>> we're<br>> >>>>>>>>> raising taxes on them. Like you said, they'll just pass it on to<br>> >>>>>>>>> the<br>> >>>>>>>>> customer anyway. But now said customer has a choice - should they<br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> spend<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>> their extra paycheck money on shoes for the kids, or on a widget<br>> >>>>>>>>> from<br>> >>>>>>>>> Company X?<br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>> Paul<br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>> No Weatherman wrote:<br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>> Comrade Paul:<br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>> Corporations absolutely have a right to make a profit and it's<br>> >>>>>>>>>> possible to tax them right out of existence or out of the country.<br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>> And if they go broke or abandon the US, how where will the<br>> >>>>>>>>>> government<br>> >>>>>>>>>> get its tax revenues?<br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>> Why don't we worry about where people are going to find their next<br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> meal<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>> before we worry about how corporations are supposed to make their<br>> >>>>>>>>>> profits?<br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Paul Rumelhart<br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> <godshatter@yahoo.com><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:<br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you raise the gas prices, the transportation costs are sent on<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> to<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> the<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> consumer. If you raise the price of some component they need,<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> the<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> costs<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> are<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> sent on to the consumer. If you raise the minimum wage, the<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> costs<br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> are<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>> sent<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> on to the consumer. What Obama wants to do is relieve some of<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> the<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> burden<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> on<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> the "consumer", by lowering their personal tax burden. With all<br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> these<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>> costs<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> being passed on to them, lowering their tax burden might actually<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> convince<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> them that they can still buy their product.<br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>> Corporations don't have a right to make a profit. If economic<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> times<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> are<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> tough, we should be focusing on the individual, not on how well<br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> Company<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>> X<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> can sell widgets to people that probably don't even need them.<br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you have a bunch of yahoos making more money than they know<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> what<br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> to<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>> do<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> with, why overly tax the person that's living on ramen noodles<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> and<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> Koolaid?Why don't we worry about where people are going to find<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> their<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> next meal<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> before we worry about how corporations are supposed to make their<br>> >>>>>>>>>>> profits?<br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>> Just my two cents.<br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>> Paul<br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>> No Weatherman wrote:<br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Paul:<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you raise taxes on corporations so that you can lower taxes<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> for<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> one<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> sector of the population, how do you think those corporations<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> will<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> recover the money they lost by the tax increase?<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> THEY WILL RAISE PRICES ON THEIR PRODUCT TO RECOUP THEIR LOSSES.<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> THEREFORE, ANY MONEY GAINED BY TAX RELIEF WILL BE LOST AT THE<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> CHECKOUT<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> STAND.<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Punitive tax hikes on corporations do not take place in a black<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> hole<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and neither does redistribution of wealth. These companies are<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> in<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> business to make money, not pay taxes, and they will make their<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> profit, taxes or not.<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Paul Rumelhart<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> <godshatter@yahoo.com><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This is an attempt to get a discussion started on the issues<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> instead<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> of<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> all the threads on who associates with who and who is<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> encouraging<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> the<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> most emotional responses.<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Here are links to the sections on the economy from the<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> and<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Republican candidates for office:<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> John McCain:<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> http://www.johnmccain.com/Issues/jobsforamerica/<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Barack Obama:<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> http://www.barackobama.com/issues/economy/<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The biggest difference between the two, in my opinion, from my<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> reading<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is that John McCain is focusing on helping corporations through<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tax<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> breaks to help the economy whereas Barack Obama is focusing on<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tax<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> breaks for the middle class instead. Both plans have a lot of<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> provisions I like - both are looking at different ways that the<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> work/family balance can be strengthened, for example.<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There's a lot of information there to go through. Please let<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> us<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> know<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> your thoughts, so we can all become more educated on the<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> candidates<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> positions. Also, if others want to tackle third-party<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> positions<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> topics, please do. I'm not educated enough about them this<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> time<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> around<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to even know who they all are.<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.fsr.net<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> List services made available by First Step Internet, serving<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.fsr.net<br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> >>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>> List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the<br>> >>>>>>>>>> img20081013055300181communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.fsr.net<br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> >>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>>>>> List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the<br>> >>>>>>>> communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> http://www.fsr.net<br>> >>>>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>><br>> >>>>>>><br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>>> List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>> >>>>>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>> >>>>>> http://www.fsr.net<br>> >>>>>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> >>>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>> List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>> >>>>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>> >>>>> http://www.fsr.net<br>> >>>>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> >>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>> List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>> >>>>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>> >>>>> http://www.fsr.net<br>> >>>>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> >>>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>>><br>> >>>><br>> >>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>> List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the<br>> >>>> communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>> >>>> http://www.fsr.net<br>> >>>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> >>>> =======================================================<br>> >>>><br>> >>>><br>> >>>><br>> >>><br>> >>><br>> >><br>> >> =======================================================<br>> >> List services made available by First Step Internet, serving the<br>> >> communities of the Palouse since 1994. http://www.fsr.net<br>> >> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> >> =======================================================<br>> >><br>> >><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> <br>> =======================================================<br>> List services made available by First Step Internet, <br>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <br>> http://www.fsr.net <br>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> =======================================================<br><br /><hr />See how Windows Mobile brings your life together—at home, work, or on the go. <a href='http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093182mrt/direct/01/' target='_new'>See Now</a></body>
</html>