<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Fascinating. What I learned about side-by-side comparisons in looking for plagiary came from the works of Confederation of Reformed Evangelical Churches pastors, many of whom I bet Weatherman is familiar with.<br><br>Keely<br>http://keely-prevailingwinds.blogspot.com/<br><br><br>> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:47:29 -0700<br>> From: no.weatherman@gmail.com<br>> To: vision2020@moscow.com<br>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Joseph Biden’s Foreign Policy Experience<br>> <br>> Tom,<br>> <br>> If my memory serves me correctly, I believe that I linked to your site<br>> yesterday to buttress my point about Barrack Hussein Obama's running<br>> mate, Joseph Biden.<br>> <br>> So to answer your question, the side-by-side images on your website<br>> are incontrovertible proof of plagiarism and as I said to Chasuk,<br>> where there's one there's more. You can bet the tall grass on this<br>> one. Those two are no less guilty of chronic plagiarism than the<br>> Democratic Party's candidate for Vice President. Thankfully, however,<br>> their moral failure cannot affect public policy, contra rhymin' Biden.<br>> <br>> So, if you're opposed to plagiarists, as appears to be the case from<br>> your website, why do you support the Hussein-Biden ticket?<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Tom Hansen <idahotom@hotmail.com> wrote:<br>> > Tell us, no-man -<br>> ><br>> > Does this qualify as a symptom of chronic plagiarism?<br>> ><br>> > http://www.notonthepalouse.com/plagiarism.htm<br>> ><br>> > Hmm.<br>> ><br>> > Tom Hansen<br>> > Moscow, Idaho<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > ________________________________<br>> >> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:22:50 -0700<br>> >> From: chasuk@gmail.com<br>> >> To: no.weatherman@gmail.com<br>> >> CC: vision2020@moscow.com<br>> >> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Joseph Biden's Foreign Policy Experience<br>> >><br>> >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:16, No Weatherman <no.weatherman@gmail.com><br>> >> wrote:<br>> >><br>> >> > Negative, I am saying that when it involves plagiarism, where there's<br>> >> > one there's more.<br>> >><br>> >> So, because you are suspicious of plagiarism ever just occurring once,<br>> >> that plagiarism is automatically chronic?<br>> >><br>> >> > Ask any academic, plagiarists are always repeat offenders and<br>> >> > comparing theft to eating, as you just did, is absurd.<br>> >><br>> >> I wasn't comparing theft to eating. I was illustrating the definition<br>> >> of chronic.<br>> >><br>> >> =======================================================<br>> >> List services made available by First Step Internet,<br>> >> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br>> >> http://www.fsr.net<br>> >> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> >> =======================================================<br>> ><br>> ><br>> <br>> =======================================================<br>> List services made available by First Step Internet, <br>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <br>> http://www.fsr.net <br>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> =======================================================<br><br /><hr />Want to do more with Windows Live? Learn “10 hidden secrets” from Jamie. <a href='http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008' target='_new'>Learn Now</a></body>
</html>