<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><DIV>Anyone that isn't a lawyer. : ) Moms, dads, law abiding citizens.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Best Regards,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Donovan<BR><BR>--- On <B>Mon, 9/22/08, Paul Rumelhart <I><godshatter@yahoo.com></I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid">From: Paul <SPAN>Rumelhart</SPAN> <godshatter@yahoo.com><BR>Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Vision2020] Lawyer's duty<BR>To: donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com<BR>Cc: vision2020@moscow.com, "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam@hotmail.com><BR>Date: Monday, September 22, 2008, 7:42 PM<BR><BR><PRE>Who are these "experts in morality" of which you speak?
Paul
Donovan Arnold wrote:
> Sunil,
>
> The problem with this is that it is lawyers that discipline the
> lawyers. Lawyers that argue if what someone did was ethical or
> unethical. And of course, there is a trial and all the rules set up
> lawyers.
>
> Other lawyers are not the best judges of their own morality. Shouldn't
> experts in morality be the ones to decide, or at least a group of
> impartial jurors?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Donovan
>
> --- On *Mon, 9/22/08, Sunil Ramalingam
> /<sunilramalingam@hotmail.com>/* wrote:
>
> From: Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam@hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Lawyer's duty
> To: vision2020@moscow.com
> Date: Monday, September 22, 2008, 11:32 AM
>
> Roger,
>
> I've already said that. I've said it's our duty to
represent our
> clients only, and to do it within the rules that apply to us.
> That includes the ethical rules. It's not ethical to use 'any
> methods.' A lawyer who does not represent clients within the
> applicable rules is subject to discipline.
>
> Sunil
>
> > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:08:25 -0700
> > From: lfalen@turbonet.com
> > To: vision2020@moscow.com
> > Subject: [Vision2020] Lawyer's duty
> >
> > When I tried "reply all" I get and "Ice Wrap"
message. This has
> happen several times when I tried to reply to your post.
> > In any case I would agree with all but your last sentience.
> While a lawyer's duty is to defend their client to the best of
> their ability, that should be within the constrants of what is
> ethical. To use any methods to get a client off not justified,
> particularly if the client is without doubt guilty and may again
> do harm to society.
> > Roger
> >
> > =======================================================
> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > http://www.fsr.net
> > mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
> > =======================================================
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com
> =======================================================
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table><br>