<div>Paris Hilton is very sexy, no doubt about it, as many men agree. There are a lot of sexy women and men that are trying to make it big being sexy... Paris had the advantages of wealth and connections... But Paris Hilton's sexiness is certainly a result of scoring high in the genetic lottery of sexiness... Or did her parents have her genetically engineered? This day may come, but we are not there yet. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>If Paris looked like Rosie O'Donnell, what would have happened to her as a celebrity? Not much. Paris is not smart and funny and aggressive (as far as I know...) like Rosie...who is a good example of a women making it big being smart and funny and in your face, not sexy. Progress!</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I am correcting a rather clumsy, confusing and insufficiently broad sentence in the post on "Upton Sinclair's Novel..."</div>
<div> </div>
<div>This sentence should read more like the sentence below it:</div>
<div><br>To conduct an experiment in equal wealth distribution to discover who would rise and fall in the end in their adulthood based only on their economic birth status, would demand everyone be given the same in womb and childhood environment... Impossible.<br>
</div>
<div>To conduct an experiment in equal wealth distribution to discover who would rise and fall, based solely on their abilities, after their wealth was equalized in adulthood, would demand everyone be given the same in womb (babies from mothers who use alcohol in pregnancy, for example, sometimes have a disadvantage) and childhood environment, which is impossible; and that after wealth re-distribution, all the business and economic class connections that are a critical aspect of achieving success were also equalized, without, it goes without saying, anyone suffering prejudice based on skin color, gender, religion, ethnicity, nationality, political allegiances, philosophy (unless in employment where these parameters are essential to the job, such as employment by the Republican National Committee being limited to declared Republicans, or not allowing atheists employment at Moscow's Christ Church); height, weight or sexual attractiveness (unless in a sexiness, sports or fitness based business), clothing, makeup or hair care preferences (unless in a modeling or cosmetics or beauty oriented business), favorite food, cars, sports teams, musical artists, or film directors (unless working in culinary, automotive, sports, music or film related businesses), etc. etc. etc., so that if you (to pick the last example of potential prejudice from this list), a master mechanic, apply for work, for example, at Joe's Garage, having nothing to do with film, and they won't hire you because you worship Michael Moore, and they all hate Michael Moore, given they worship George W. Bush, you are unjustly being denied employment.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Stopping unfair treatment in the competitive marketplace is so hard... Prejudice lurks everywhere... I mean, is there ever a homely man or women anchoring CNN, MSNBC or FOX News, regardless of how talented a journalist or brilliant? Don't beautiful people have an unfair advantage in the job market? I want to see the elephant man hosting Larry King Live... He'd probably do a better job...They should post a clarification on the CNN hiring website, "No ugly people need apply for newscaster."</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://www.cnn.com/JOBS/" target="_blank">http://www.cnn.com/JOBS/</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div>CNN is an equal opportunity employer. In order to ensure equal employment opportunity for every applicant, all hiring decisions will be made without regard to race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin, citizenship status, veteran status, or disability. The Company is firmly committed to a policy and practice of non-discrimination in all areas of employment, and the Company will fully comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes pertaining to employment.</div>
<div>-------------------</div>
<div>B*lls**t</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Ted Moffett</div>
<div> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/31/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Tom Hansen</b> <<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com" target="_blank">thansen@moscow.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Ted Moffett stated:<br><br>"There is one very important variable influencing "success," that<br>
influences moral character, that no one chooses for themselves:<br><br>Genetics. "<br><br>How right you are, Ted.<br><br>For example:<br><br>Paris Hilton . . . Now, THERE's a real success story.<br><br>Some successes were forced to identify their strengths, skills, and<br>
talents. Then develop and improve upon these strengths, skills, and<br>talents in order to maintain a competetive edge on their peers.<br><br>Paris Hilton's skill is limited to . . . being born a Hilton.<br><br>You go, girl.<br>
<br>Tom Hansen<br>Moscow,<br>Idaho<br><br>---------------------------------------------<br>This message was sent by First Step Internet.<br> <a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://www.fsr.com/" target="_blank">http://www.fsr.com/</a><br>
<br><br></blockquote></div><br>