<DIV>Joe,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I am sorry you are not reading my words and are instead trying to read into them. One thing that should be apparent to most people on here, I don't need to infer or reflect anything in what I say, I say what I mean, and mean what I say, regardless of its political/social implications. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Right and Left political affiliations are subjective. I consider you, for Idaho, very far to the left. Anyone that attacks Wal-Mart from a moral standpoint is generally to the left. As 87% of the American Population bought something from Wal-Mart in the previous year. Undoubtedly, some of the 13% that didn't, didn't for reasons other than moral objections, such as living some place where there isn't a Wal-Mart, or making so much money Wal-Mart quality goods are below their standards, or they don't have any money. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I believe, based on the evidence presented to me, that shopping at
Wal-Mart doesn't worsen human conditions in China. You would think if it did, people in China would not be clamoring to work at the factories that contract with Wal-Mart. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>The United States did not always have great working conditions, like you seem to think they do. They started with slavery and have slowly worked improved conditions as our economic, social, and political evolution allowed us. It costs money and resources to improve working conditions. The only way to do that is to purchase more from the companies so that they have that amount money. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>You offer criticism, but you offer no workable solutions for China. So, to me it is ignorant babble saying not to buy from Wal-Mart.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>People don't buy from Wal-Mart to improve or torture people in China, they buy from Wal-Mart to improve the conditions of their own household. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Best Regards,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Donovan<BR><BR><B><I>Joe Campbell <joekc@adelphia.net></I></B> wrote:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Donovan,<BR><BR>I drew the same conclusions as Sunil. There is nothing about the quoted passage below that indicates the view you now claim to have expressed.<BR><BR>For the record, in general I favor neither boycotts nor embargoes. But then again, I'm not a member of the far left! I favor putting pressure on Walmart and Walmart shoppers, making them realize that low cost at the expense of human rights is not a good thing. This is just offering some critical comments about a particular business practice -- using cheap labor from countries that don't respect human rights. It is not a boycott, not an embargo, and not the endorsement of either. <BR><BR>And for those like you and Roger who keep suggesting that somehow China is going to improve their human rights record
just because folks like Walmart continue to buy from them, my question is: Why on earth should I believe that? What evidence is there to suggest that this is true?<BR><BR>Best, Joe<BR><BR>---- Donovan Arnold <DONOVANJARNOLD2005@YAHOO.COM>wrote: <BR><BR>=============<BR>Ted,<BR><BR>I never made the claim that the Cuban embargo was supported by leftists! Sunil twisted my words. I said embargoes don't work, and was using Cuba and Iraq as an example of past embargoes failing to accomplish their intended goal. <BR><BR>"What many far leftists don't understand is that embargoes didn't help the people in Cuba, or in Iraq, nor will they help the people of China."<BR><BR>My claim was that far-lefts want to boycott China. Which they do. That is why a significant group of far-leftists advocate not buying from China or Wal-Mart.<BR><BR>Embargoes don't work, they don't hurt the people you intend them to hurt. Regardless of which political affiliation the people are that are implementing
it.<BR><BR>Best Regards,<BR><BR>Donovan <BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>Ted Moffett <STARBLISS@GMAIL.COM>wrote:<BR><BR>Sunil et. al.<BR><BR>Political stereotyping is out of control, distorts our perceptions of political and economic reality, and will continue to do so, as certain as death and taxes. Thus it is refreshing to read that you correct the claim that the embargo on Cuba is supported by "far leftists."<BR><BR>Of course we can look to buy goods made elsewhere than China. How about "Made In USA?"<BR><BR>Ted Moffett<BR><BR><BR>On 3/27/08, Sunil Ramalingam <SUNILRAMALINGAM@HOTMAIL.COM>wrote: It's not 'far-leftists' supporting the embargo on Cuba. I certainly preferred the embargo on Iraq to war, since those appeared to be the only alternatives. I don't think we should embargo China either, though we can certainly look to buy goods made elsewhere should we choose.<BR><BR>Sunil<BR><BR><BR>---------------------------------<BR>Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:26:29 -0700<BR>From:
donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com<BR>To: lfalen@turbonet.com; garrettmc@verizon.net; vision2020@moscow.com <BR>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Food/gas prices<BR><BR>Roger,<BR><BR>I think you are 100% correct here. What many far leftists don't understand is that embargoes didn't help the people in Cuba, or in Iraq, nor will they help the people of China. <BR><BR>I would love to find a company that had bio-diesel available. <BR><BR>Best Regards,<BR><BR>Donovan<BR><BR>lfalen <LFALEN@TURBONET.COM>wrote:<BR>There was a small biodiesiel operator in Genesee for about a year. He was using used vegetable oil. He has filed for bankruptcy. One was proposed at the port of Wilma. That plan has been withdrawn, but I think a different company is looking at it, I don't know where the closest plant in operation is. Biocke Bros. at Kendrick are working with Canola as an energy source.<BR>On trade with China I think it is a plus and hopefully will speed their attention to human rights. We should
however, improve the inspection and regulation of incoming good to prevent the kind of problems that have ocured the last couple of years. <BR>The embargo on Cuba has not improved any thing there and has probably made it worse. Trade has a better chance of working than embargoes. Keep the pressure on in regard to human right and inspections but still trade.<BR>Roger<BR>-----Original message-----<BR>From: Donovan Arnold donovanjarnold2005@yahoo.com<BR>Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:18:21 -0700<BR>To: Garrett Clevenger garrettmc@verizon.net, vision 2020 vision2020@moscow.com<BR>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Food/gas prices<BR><BR>> Garrett,<BR>> <BR>> I am afraid that I don't see economics the same way you do. <BR>> I think Wal-Mart increases the quality of life for people in China, and here at home. I think the reason that so many Chinese people compete for jobs at factories that contract with Wal-Mart is because they are better than the other jobs in China.<BR>>
<BR>> A factory worker in China lives higher on the economic scale in his country than I do in mine. A factory workers in China gets $300-$400 a month, plus there housing and medical care are provided. $300 in China, will buy a lot more than it will here. Add to this fact that they don't own automobiles, and your life is comparatively better than the average Chinese person. <BR>> <BR>> A good reason why China has such poor human conditions has to do more with their overpopulation and lack of resources to provide for them all than it has to do with willful human rights and environmental abuses. <BR>> <BR>> The United States had just as bad of a human rights record just as little as a 100 years when we were in our industrialization age. We had children working in coal mines. We had women working in inhuman and unsafe working conditions. We denied people jobs on the basis of gender, age, disability, race, and religion. We are only better because we grew wealthy
and were able to slowly change the working conditions one issue at a time.<BR>> <BR>> I think China will eventually get there. But if we all stop buying from them, they will take longer to get there. It costs money to update and make all factories safer for workers, the only way they get that money is through the labor of its workers and landing big US contracts. <BR>> <BR>> I believe, if you wanted to help the US workforce, both in wages, and working conditions, you would start by shutting down companies that employ illegal immigrants. We need to lead by changing our own working conditions first. <BR>> <BR>> The reason why oil prices are high is because environmentalism will not allow us to drill here at home. If we could drill off our own shores, maybe drill for oil in Mexico and provide jobs there, we could drive down prices. I think we should also look to the long term and start finding alternative sources of energy, in a very serious way.<BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> On a side note, can you tell me where the closest biodiesiel refinery plants are located? Thanks.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Best Regards,<BR>> <BR>> Donovan <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Garrett Clevenger wrote:<BR>> Donovan writes:<BR>> <BR>> "This is why you need a Wal-Mart Super Center in<BR>> Moscow, the competition keeps the prices low."<BR>> <BR>> Donovan,<BR>> <BR>> I wonder, do you not see the problem Wal-Mart poses to<BR>> not only our local economy, but of the unsustainable,<BR>> and exploitative, nature of Wal-Mart's leverage? <BR>> <BR>> I ask this because I assume you would have a problem<BR>> with the ethics of a company that seems to violate<BR>> moral reasoning, such as exploitation of workers in<BR>> China who, no matter how deserving of earning money to<BR>> live, are still treated as expendable. <BR>> <BR>> These Chinese companies Wal-Mart purchases
from, on<BR>> top of competing with American companies, do not have<BR>> to follow the same environmental, labor or other<BR>> regulations that the US makes American companies<BR>> follow, so are thus at an unfair competitive advantage<BR>> as they dump their wastes into their rivers, and send<BR>> their pollutants into the air that the US Park Service<BR>> is now able to sample in our National Parks.<BR>> <BR>> How many poisoned products do we have to import before<BR>> you say this isn't right? <BR>> <BR>> How many small businesses that go under because they<BR>> can't compete with the buying power of Wal-Mart do you<BR>> think is acceptable?<BR>> <BR>> Will you recognize that Wal-Mart is a major instigator<BR>> of Chinese trade, and thus our trade deficit? That<BR>> the Wal-Mart/China relationship is a major factor in<BR>> the down-turn in the US economy? After all, it's<BR>> reported that China is holding $1.5
trillion of our<BR>> dept, a lot of it for the Iraq War, which has caused<BR>> oil prices to increase as you recognize. The hundreds<BR>> of billions of dollars Wal-Mart spends in China on<BR>> cheap goods is now being lent back to us to support<BR>> the war machine. Kind of ironic, I think.<BR>> <BR>> It seems if we focused more on our local economy, and<BR>> limited the amount of foreign made products we could<BR>> be providing for ourselves, we would in the long run<BR>> be keeping prices low. After all, as fuel prices<BR>> continue to escalate, we are only going to find how<BR>> important it is to reduce transportation costs. What<BR>> better time to start that than now?<BR>> <BR>> I believe in the long run Hawkins, and Super Wal-Mart,<BR>> will be more of an expensive burden on Moscow than if<BR>> we were to start using those resources to build our<BR>> local economy in a more sustainable way, rather than<BR>>
subsidizing the wealth of China.<BR>> <BR>> gclev<BR>> <BR>> =======================================================<BR>> List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR>> http://www.fsr.net <BR>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>> =======================================================<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ---------------------------------<BR>> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.<BR>> <BR><BR><BR><BR>---------------------------------<BR>Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.<BR><BR><BR>=======================================================<BR>List services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>serving the communities of the Palouse since
1994.<BR>http://www.fsr.net<BR>mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================<BR><BR><BR>=======================================================<BR>List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR>http://www.fsr.net <BR>mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================<BR><BR><BR>---------------------------------<BR>OMG, Sweet deal for Yahoo! users/friends: Get A Month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. W00t<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><p> 
<hr size=1>Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ "> Try it now.</a>