<div> </div>
<div>Tom et. al.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks for the legal information impacting Moscow's water deal with out of state private developer Hawkins. Legal language can easily be misinterpreted by a layman, but my reading leads me to think there may be legal problems with Moscow selling water to out of state Hawkins... I wonder if the legal eagles on Vision2020 might enlighten us ordinary mortals are to the correct interpretation of the Idaho water law involved in this opinion? It would be rather incredible for the Moscow City Council to rule against what they have insisted was a well considered water deal with Hawkins, claimed to be in the best interests of the city, unless under serious pressure to do so. However, there are plenty of crows on the Palouse to eat...</div>
<div> </div>
<div>As to the Moscow Health Insurance policy for domestic partnerships, if the U of I caved under the legal pressure regarding Idaho's Super DOMA, to avoid a lawsuit, I suspect the Moscow City Council may do the same.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Ted Moffett<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/27/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Tom Hansen</b> <<a href="mailto:thansen@moscow.com">thansen@moscow.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Greetings Visionaires -<br><br>I have a question that I feel must be answered . . .<br><br>Which opnion, submitted by the State Attorney General's Office, will the<br>
city of Moscow enforce?</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="http://www.MoscowCares.com/SAG_Opinions.htm">http://www.MoscowCares.com/SAG_Opinions.htm</a></div>
<div><br>Seeya round town, Moscow.<br><br>Tom Hansen<br>Moscow, Idaho<br><br><br>"People who ridicule others while hiding behind anonymous monikers in chat-<br>room forums are neither brave nor clever."<br><br>
- Latah County Sheriff Wayne Rausch (August 21,<br>2007)<br><br> </div></div>