<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16587" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I believe that simple prior clearance or even
notice with Mr. Steed (indicating the intent of subsequent public posting
etc) would have eradicated all problems one way or the other.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Warren Hayman</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=starbliss@gmail.com href="mailto:starbliss@gmail.com">Ted Moffett</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=chasuk@gmail.com
href="mailto:chasuk@gmail.com">Chasuk</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=vision2020@moscow.com
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">Vision 2020</A> ; <A
title=garrettmc@verizon.net href="mailto:garrettmc@verizon.net">Garrett
Clevenger</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, February 12, 2008 5:56
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Vision2020] Water and Sewer
Agreements: second reply fromWalter Steed</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Feb 12, 2008 5:27 PM, Chasuk <<A
href="mailto:chasuk@gmail.com">chasuk@gmail.com</A>> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<DIV class=Ih2E3d>On Feb 12, 2008 5:20 PM, Ted Moffett <<A
href="mailto:starbliss@gmail.com">starbliss@gmail.com</A>>
wrote:<BR>\<BR>> This indicates clearly that Mr. Steed knew Garrett might
post his response<BR>> to the list, and asked him not to. But I
disagree with Mr. Steeds decision,<BR>> and the obvious avoidance of
Vision2020 by many public officials, to refuse<BR>> to engage in dialog
on Vision2020.<BR><BR></DIV>I took it to mean that he knew that Garrett was
posting his emails to<BR>Vision2020, and wished for Garrett to make clear
that this<BR>second-hand participation was not an invitation to
contact him<BR>directly. Garrett complied by publishing that
excerpt.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I understand this interpretation. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>But if Mr. Steed is open to all e-mails from private individuals, as he
wrote below,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>"I try to respond promptly at all e-mails sent directly to me by
individuals,,,"</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>this might contradict the statement he does not want Garrett to
"incite Vision2020 to start sending everything to me..." as he also
wrote.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>So is Mr. Steed open to anyone subscribed to Vision2020
contacting him privately? Or was he saying he did not want a flood
of private e-mails from Vision2020 subscribers?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>For Garrett to post his responses to the list certainly might invite
many private and/or public responses, no matter who wishes what.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Ted Moffett</DIV></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>=======================================================<BR> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>
http://www.fsr.net
<BR>
mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>=======================================================</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>