<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<FONT face=Arial>Here's the minority report: </FONT><A href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport#report"><U><FONT face=Arial color=#810081>http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport#report</FONT></U></A>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> Tim Ball is in there, along with several economists? This is looking like last gasp stuff alright.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> I'm thinking we could consider building some giant Oxytocin generators, flood the atmosphere with good cheer, and then see what works out.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Dave</FONT></DIV><BR><BR>> <BR>> My Heavens, Mr. Moffett is having an extraordinarily difficult time letting <BR>> this tired subject go. Goodness knows I'm sure your "concern" is of <BR>> monumental import for some (well you mainly) but it is equally a waste of <BR>> time. I take your opinions and recriminations as seriously as your dire <BR>> anthropogenic climate change doom predictions. That is to say they are <BR>> chuckled over then discarded out of hand.<BR>> <BR>> On that note, please see:<BR>> <BR>> US Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works<BR>> <BR>> "Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently <BR>> voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called "consensus" <BR>> on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and <BR>> former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate <BR>> Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice <BR>> President Al Gore.<BR>> <BR>> The new report issued by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee's <BR>> office of the GOP Ranking Member details the views of the scientists, the <BR>> overwhelming majority of whom spoke out in 2007.<BR>> <BR>> Even some in the establishment media now appears to be taking notice of the <BR>> growing number of skeptical scientists. In October, the Washington Post <BR>> Staff Writer Juliet Eilperin conceded the obvious, writing that climate <BR>> skeptics "appear to be expanding rather than shrinking." Many scientists <BR>> from around the world have dubbed 2007 as the year man-made global warming <BR>> fears "bites the dust." (LINK)<BR>> <BR>> This blockbuster Senate report lists the scientists by name, country of <BR>> residence, and academic/institutional affiliation. It also features their <BR>> own words, biographies, and weblinks to their peer reviewed studies and <BR>> original source materials as gathered from public statements, various news <BR>> outlets, and websites in 2007. This new "consensus busters" report is poised <BR>> to redefine the debate."<BR>> <BR>> I imagine I can hear the responses already. The melodic shrieking of "Hacks" <BR>> "Corporate Shills," and "Propaganda." If the standard response is going to <BR>> be another round of "we're right and you suck" along with a rousing chorus <BR>> of "our scientists are more brainy then yours," please save it for the like <BR>> minded at the coffee shop. Your current argument suffers for its endless <BR>> repetition and diminishing credibility.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> g<BR>> <BR>> ----- Original Message ----- <BR>> From: "Ted Moffett" <starbliss@gmail.com><BR>> To: "Scott Dredge" <sdredge@yahoo.com><BR>> Cc: <vision2020@moscow.com><BR>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 7:06 PM<BR>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Civility is a two-way street<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> > Scott wrote:<BR>> ><BR>> >><BR>> >> Perfect! I hope we don't ever again need to read from you or anyone else<BR>> >> about how unethical Gary was for posting a private email considering you<BR>> >> don't care what he posts.<BR>> ><BR>> > Just to clarify, anyone who posts private e-mail to Vision2020 is a<BR>> > concern for this list serve, and should be responded to... I stated I<BR>> > did not respond to "irrational content" or "ad hominem attacks."<BR>> > Usually a waste of time. Someone forwarding private e-mail to<BR>> > Vision2020 is a different matter.<BR>> ><BR>> > Ted Moffett<BR>> ><BR>> > =======================================================<BR>> > List services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<BR>> > http://www.fsr.net<BR>> > mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>> > =======================================================<BR>> > <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> =======================================================<BR>> List services made available by First Step Internet, <BR>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <BR>> http://www.fsr.net <BR>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<BR>> =======================================================<BR><br /><hr />Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary! <a href='http://club.live.com/chicktionary.aspx?icid=chick_wlhmtextlink1_dec' target='_new'>Check it out!</a></body>
</html>