<img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/WAYNEF%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-6.jpg" alt=""><br><br><h2 class="date-header">Friday, December 7, 2007</h2>
<a name="4689641116869702129"></a>
<h3 class="post-title entry-title">
<a href="http://federal-vision.blogspot.com/2007/12/anonymity-part-ii.html">Anonymity Part II</a>
</h3>
<div class="post-body entry-content">
<p>Before I resume my defense of <a target="_blank" href="http://federal-vision.blogspot.com/2007/11/anonymity-part-i.html">anonymity</a>,
I need to debunk the myth that Douglas Wilson is effectively
accountable to anyone, because he cannot get through a sentence with
the words "anonymous accuser" or "anonymous witness" without invoking <i>accountability.</i>
And of course, we all know that Douglas Wilson is accountable to
someone a session of elders, a band of confederates, the civil
magistrate <i>someone,</i> for his words and behavior. At least that's the impression he leaves. But impression isn't reality, except in the land of <a target="_blank" href="http://federal-vision.blogspot.com/2007/09/dumb.html">
DUMB</a>, and accountability does not exist simply because someone implies it.<br><br>This brings us to the following article in the Christ Church Constitution, which states:<br></p><blockquote><b>Removal of PASTORS, Elders, and Deacons
</b><br>If
an elder believes himself to be fit for office, but two or three
believers hold that he is unfit, these two or three witnesses should
request a special session of the elder board where they would be
allowed to present their case (1 Tim. 5:19). If the elders unanimously
decide that the case has merit, that elder, depending on the gravity of
the charges and his response to the correction, will be rebuked in the
presence of the heads of households (1 Tim. 5:20), or will be removed
from the office of elder (1 Tim. 3:17; Tit. 1:59), or both.<br><br>While
Christ Church encourages her pastor(s) toward a long-term view of the
ministry, in the providence of God, changes in a pastor's call to a
particular church arise for both righteous and sinful reasons. In cases
involving moral failures requiring disciplinary proceedings, the
disciplinary process for the removal of a pastor is the same as for
other officers. For cases that do not involve moral failures or
disciplinary proceedings (e.g., Acts 15:3341, Romans 15:2233, 1
Corinthians 16:512), the procedure for terminating the call of a
pastor, thereby dismissing him from service at Christ Church, is as
follows: If a pastor desires to terminate his call, he shall duly
inform the session of his desire. In the case of an involuntary
termination of his call, a pastor may be recommended for dismissal from
service at Christ Church by a unanimous vote of the session (excluding
said pastor). In such a case, the pastor may have recourse to the
electors by calling for a vote to either sustain his call as pastor or
not (with an option to abstain). If the electors sustain his call by a
two-thirds majority vote, the other elders must afterwards either
concede to his call or refer the matter to the Confederation of
Reformed Evangelicals for binding arbitration. (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.christkirk.com/Literature/Constitution.asp">Christ Church Constitution</a>)</blockquote><br>Please
notice the twofold use of the word "unanimous" and the four layers of
insulation protecting Wilson. In the event of charges, the elders must
vote unanimously that "the case has merit" (also notice the built-in
ambiguity "merit" does not equal "guilt," which gives him room to
maneuver if the case has merit). If the "merit" is sufficient for
removal, then the elders must vote unanimously to remove Wilson. If
this vote passes, Wilson can lobby the congregation to overturn the
unanimous vote of their elders. Finally, if the elders don't like it,
they can take the matter to the CREC just as Andrew Sandlin and <a target="_blank" href="http://crec.wordpress.com/">Church of the KingSanta Cruz</a> did. And these are only the constitutional hurdles. The Kirk constitution omits the part about many of the Kirk elders'
<a target="_blank" href="http://cleaning-house.org/?p=225">financial dependence</a>
on Wilson and his institutions, such as Logos School, NSA, or Canon
Press, where Wilson sits on the boards with other Kirk elders, which
creates a hopeless conflict of interest for every one of them. Do the
math. No one can touch Wilson without a unanimous vote of the elders,
the majority of whom depend upon him for their livelihoods.<br><br>So
let's say you're one of Wilson's 1215 (I lost count) hand-picked
elders and you work at Logos School, where he is a lifetime board
member sitting next to three other hand-picked elders on the board.
Furthermore, let's say that your conscience (I know, it's a stretch)
bears witness that you must remove Douglas Wilson from the ministry
because he is an offense to the gospel. Moreover, you know that if you
vote your conscience and at least one other elder does not share your
conviction, then Wilson will see to your unemployment quicker than you
can say, "Duck." Now, do you vote your conscience or do you stick your
finger in the wind?<br><br>Obviously this self-serving system of
"accountability" does not constitute any meaningful accountability.
Wilson chose his hirelings to serve as elders precisely because he knew
they understood their role in life was to worship the Lord their Doug
<i>not</i> to hold him accountable. This is why monkey boy Mike Lawyer stuck a dagger in Bob Mattes' back in the <a target="_blank" href="http://reformedmusings.wordpress.com/2007/11/21/attack-from-moscow/">"Attack From Moscow"
</a> and no Kirk officer peeped. He, like the rest of them, was serving the Lord his Doug to whom they all give account.<br><br><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_f-dp6o9IOmo/RyH3E8bqaiI/AAAAAAAAAKk/NwIs5mShHFg/s1600-h/ML.jpg">
<img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 20px; float: right;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_f-dp6o9IOmo/RyH3E8bqaiI/AAAAAAAAAKk/NwIs5mShHFg/s200/ML.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5125649515238025762" border="0"></a>Think
about it. Mike Lawyer makes $50,000 a year (plus or minus a few), has a
few children, a truck payment, and a mortgage. He's stretched to the
max. And he knows that if Wilson questioned his loyalty to the Lord his
Doug, he would terminate him in a heartbeat just as he did all the
others (BG, CL, DS . . . the list grows), and that's just the economic
penalty. Aggravating this conflict, Lawyer knows that no legitimate
Christian church would ever call him to the ministry after they see all
the Doug scat on his resume. The man is hopelessly conflicted.<br><br>In
a sense, Wilson has trapped the Kirk elders in worse positions than
anyone else in the Kult. But don't feel sorry for them. They're the
ones who sat idly by and consented to his iniquity the threats, the
abuse, the intimidation, the reviling, the treachery, the false
witness, the blasphemy <i>you name it.</i> Indeed, they sanctioned this sewage, they can drink it to the dregs.<br><br>But
the point is that Douglas Wilson has rigged the system. The Christ
Church Constitution grants the Kirk elders no real authority to hold
Wilson accountable. It's merely the document establishing their
castrated office, which insures that he will never answer to anyone in
any meaningful, biblical way. <i>And they know it.</i> They know, just as he knows, that they have no authority over him whatsoever.<br><br>So
every time Wilson points to those black holes in the universe called
elders, saying, "They hold me accountable," just remind yourself that
he's fulfilling Scripture, which says, "evil men and seducers shall wax
worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived" (2 Tim. 3:13).<br><br>Thank you.
</div>
<span class="post-author vcard">
Posted by
<span class="fn">Mark T.</span>
</span> <span class="post-timestamp">
at
<a class="timestamp-link" href="http://federal-vision.blogspot.com/2007/12/anonymity-part-ii.html" rel="bookmark" title="permanent link"><abbr class="published" title="2007-12-07T06:26:00-08:00">6:26 AM</abbr></a>
</span> <span class="post-comment-link">
</span> <span class="post-icons">
<span class="item-action">
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/email-post.g?blogID=9097408555576085021&postID=4689641116869702129" title="Email Post">
<span class="email-post-icon"> </span>
</a>
</span></span><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><br><br>Juanita Flores<br>Advocate for the Truth from Jesus