<div> </div>
<div>Garrett et. al.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I understand your concern, assuming your interpretation of the broad and perhaps arbitrary discretion the proposed NO might grant police for ticketing noise offenders, with no warning period. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>And then given Dave's objection that decibel meters can be used to give misleading readings, or are just inherently difficult to work with, even with the best intentions and knowledge of their use, mandating strict decibel standards for noise investigations by law enforcement, backed by a decibel meter reading, creates other problems. However, I think a high quality decibel meter that is correctly calibrated and used properly can offer reliable readings for law enforcement investigations into noise complaints, though this approach may not cover all relevant cases.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>What about multi-apartment complexes where the noise is not heard loudly from the outside, but through walls? To test for noise levels the police would have to enter the apartment from where the noise complaint was issued.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I have not studied the NO city code, or the proposed changes, in detail. But given Garrett has, perhaps he can explain how noise complaints from within the closed walls of an apartment complex are addressed?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Ted Moffett</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/16/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Garrett Clevenger</b> <<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" target="_blank" href="mailto:garrettmc@verizon.net">garrettmc@verizon.net
</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Ted and folks,<br><br>Our current NO says this:<br><br>Residential and Office Zoning Districts: Sixty-five
<br>(65) dBA during the daytime (7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M.)<br>and fifty-five (55) dBA at nighttime (10:00 P.M. to<br>7:00 A.M.) as measured at the property line of the<br>source.<br><br>The only problem, it also says this:
<br><br>"The following acts, among others, are declared to be<br>unlawful nuisance noises in violation of this Code<br>Section, but said enumeration shall not be deemed to<br>be exclusive; these acts may constitute a violation
<br>even when the noises created are within the limits<br>contained elsewhere herein"<br><br>Which basically means the above dB's are not<br>necessarily the max dB on your property.<br><br>That, combined with removing neighbor complaints and a
<br>warning period leads to this if the council votes to<br>approve the current NOM:<br><br>The police will have the right to give a ticket to<br>anybody in Moscow at anytime for any "noise" an<br>officer deems offensive, even if no one complains.
<br><br>That is a significantly broader than necessary means<br>of solving the party house problem and I hope the<br>expected modifications to the amendment will address<br>this concern.<br><br>gclev<br><br>My Written Record for Moscow's Noise Ordinance
<br>Modification of 2007:<br><br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" target="_blank" href="http://garrettclevenger.com/NOMhistory.html">http://garrettclevenger.com/NOMhistory.html</a><br><br>=======================================================
<br>List services made available by First Step Internet, <br>serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br> <a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" target="_blank" href="http://www.fsr.net/">
http://www.fsr.net</a><br> mailto:<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" target="_blank" href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>=======================================================
<br></blockquote></div><br>